BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

594 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33724540)

  • 1. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for 20-30 mm colorectal polyps.
    Inoue T; Nakagawa K; Yamasaki Y; Shichijo S; Kanesaka T; Maekawa A; Higashino K; Uedo N; Ishihara R; Takeuchi Y
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 36(9):2549-2557. PubMed ID: 33724540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Propensity score-matched analysis of endoscopic resection for recurrent colorectal neoplasms: A pilot study.
    Ohmori M; Yamasaki Y; Iwagami H; Nakahira H; Matsuura N; Shichijo S; Maekawa A; Kanesaka T; Yamamoto S; Higashino K; Uedo N; Ishihara R; Okada H; Takeuchi Y
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 36(9):2568-2574. PubMed ID: 33843099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Sessile or Flat Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Nagl S; Ebigbo A; Goelder SK; Roemmele C; Neuhaus L; Weber T; Braun G; Probst A; Schnoy E; Kafel AJ; Muzalyova A; Messmann H
    Gastroenterology; 2021 Nov; 161(5):1460-1474.e1. PubMed ID: 34371000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes for Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of 21-30-mm Colorectal Polyps: A Feasible Study.
    Okimoto K; Matsumura T; Matsusaka K; Inaba Y; Ishikawa T; Akizue N; Kaneko T; Ota M; Ohta Y; Taida T; Saito K; Ogasawara S; Maruoka D; Kato J; Ikeda JI; Kato N
    Dig Dis Sci; 2023 Oct; 68(10):3963-3973. PubMed ID: 37658209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.
    Schenck RJ; Jahann DA; Patrie JT; Stelow EB; Cox DG; Uppal DS; Sauer BG; Shami VM; Strand DS; Wang AY
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4174-4183. PubMed ID: 28342125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sundaram S; Seth V; Jearth V; Giri S
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2023 May; 115(5):225-233. PubMed ID: 36148677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Intermediate-Size Colorectal Polyps.
    Yamashina T; Uedo N; Akasaka T; Iwatsubo T; Nakatani Y; Akamatsu T; Kawamura T; Takeuchi Y; Fujii S; Kusaka T; Shimokawa T
    Gastroenterology; 2019 Aug; 157(2):451-461.e2. PubMed ID: 30981791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial : (UEMR vs. CEMR for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps).
    Zhang Z; Xia Y; Cui H; Yuan X; Wang C; Xie J; Tong Y; Wang W; Xu L
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Sep; 20(1):311. PubMed ID: 32967616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of precutting endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for large (20-30 mm) flat colorectal lesions.
    Oh CK; Cho YW; Choi IH; Lee HH; Lim CH; Kim JS; Lee BI; Cho YS
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Mar; 37(3):568-575. PubMed ID: 34845766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feasibility and outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥ 10 mm colorectal polyps.
    Siau K; Ishaq S; Cadoni S; Kuwai T; Yusuf A; Suzuki N
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2656-2663. PubMed ID: 29101560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Lim XC; Nistala KRY; Ng CH; Lin SY; Tan DJH; Ho KY; Chong CS; Muthiah M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2021 Jul; 27(25):3925-3939. PubMed ID: 34321855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥10-mm colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li DF; Lai MG; Yang MF; Zou ZY; Xu J; Peng RM; Xiong F; Wei C; Zhang DG; Xu ZL; Wang LS; Yao J
    Endoscopy; 2021 Jun; 53(6):636-646. PubMed ID: 32767283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of partial injection underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial duodenal epithelial tumor: Propensity score-matched study (with video).
    Takatori Y; Kato M; Masunaga T; Kubosawa Y; Mizutani M; Kiguchi Y; Matsuura N; Nakayama A; Yahagi N
    Dig Endosc; 2022 Mar; 34(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34370891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of colon polyps superior to conventional techniques? A network analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal dissection.
    Tan DJH; Ng CH; Lim XC; Lim WH; Yuen LZH; Koh JH; Nistala KRY; Ho KY; Chong CS; Muthiah MD
    Endosc Int Open; 2022 Jan; 10(1):E154-E162. PubMed ID: 35047346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Underwater colorectal EMR: remodeling endoscopic mucosal resection.
    Curcio G; Granata A; Ligresti D; Tarantino I; Barresi L; Liotta R; Traina M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 May; 81(5):1238-42. PubMed ID: 25746979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (with videos).
    Park SS; Han KS; Kim B; Chang Kim B; Hong CW; Sohn DK; Chang HJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 May; 91(5):1164-1171.e2. PubMed ID: 31904380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥10 mm sessile or flat colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang X; Wang Y; Cao X; Zhang C; Miao L
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0299931. PubMed ID: 38451998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    de Souza MHG; do Espirito Santo PA; Maluf-Filho F; Lenz L
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 38(1):208. PubMed ID: 37552342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EVALUATION OF UNDERWATER ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION FOR COLORECTAL POLYPS IN AN OUTPATIENT CLINIC IN BRAZIL.
    Schacher FC; Braga QM; Severo HR; Barlem GG; John JA; Sander GB
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2021; 58(3):390-393. PubMed ID: 34705976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a rescue treatment in difficult colorectal ESD cases.
    Okamoto K; Muguruma N; Kagemoto K; Mitsui Y; Fujimoto D; Kitamura S; Kimura T; Sogabe M; Miyamoto H; Takayama T
    Dig Endosc; 2017 Apr; 29 Suppl 2():45-52. PubMed ID: 28425649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.