These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33724617)

  • 1. Comparison of acute and long-term outcomes of Evolution
    Bahadır N; Canpolat U; Kaya EB; Sahiner ML; Ateş AH; Yorgun H; Aytemir K
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 May; 32(5):1395-1404. PubMed ID: 33724617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of transvenous lead extraction using the TightRail™ mechanical rotating dilator sheath and excimer laser sheath.
    Misra S; Swayampakala K; Coons P; Cerbie C; Guifarro A; Lesiczka M; Holshouser JW; Madjarov J; Love C; Mehta R
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Jul; 32(7):1969-1978. PubMed ID: 34028112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Initial experience with the TightRail™ Rotating Mechanical Dilator Sheath for transvenous lead extraction.
    Aytemir K; Yorgun H; Canpolat U; Şahiner ML; Kaya EB; Evranos B; Özer N
    Europace; 2016 Jul; 18(7):1043-8. PubMed ID: 26467403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy and safety of the new TightRail™ mechanical sheath for transvenous lead extraction: Results of a French multicenter study.
    Artus A; Mansourati J; Fatemi M; Pierre B; Schatz A; Badoz M; Laurent G; Guenancia C; Garnier F
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Apr; 33(4):731-737. PubMed ID: 35138039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes of transvenous lead extraction of very old leads using bidirectional rotational mechanical sheaths: Results of a multicentre study.
    Migliore F; Pittorru R; Dall'Aglio PB; De Lazzari M; Rovaris G; Piazzi E; Dentico A; Ferrieri A; D'Angelo G; Marzi A; Sawaf BE; Bertaglia E; Iliceto S; Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Carretta D; Mazzone P
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Mar; 34(3):728-737. PubMed ID: 36477909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of the new rotating dilator sheath TightRail™ for lead extraction: A bicentric experience.
    Mazzone P; Melillo F; Radinovic A; Marzi A; Paglino G; Della Bella P; Mascioli G
    J Arrhythm; 2020 Apr; 36(2):343-350. PubMed ID: 32256885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A head-to-head comparison of laser vs. powered mechanical sheaths as first choice and second line extraction tools.
    Zsigmond EJ; Saghy L; Benak A; Miklos M; Makai A; Hegedus Z; Alacs E; Agocs S; Vamos M
    Europace; 2023 Feb; 25(2):591-599. PubMed ID: 36352816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two types of rotational mechanical dilatator sheath: Evolution
    Cay S; Ozeke O; Ozcan F; Topaloglu S; Aras D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2019 Sep; 42(9):1226-1235. PubMed ID: 31257610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical predictors of adverse patient outcomes in an experience of more than 5000 chronic endovascular pacemaker and defibrillator lead extractions.
    Brunner MP; Cronin EM; Duarte VE; Yu C; Tarakji KG; Martin DO; Callahan T; Cantillon DJ; Niebauer MJ; Saliba WI; Kanj M; Wazni O; Baranowski B; Wilkoff BL
    Heart Rhythm; 2014 May; 11(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 24444444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolution in transvenous extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads using a mechanical dilator sheath.
    Oto A; Aytemir K; Canpolat U; Yorgun H; Şahiner L; Kaya EB; Kabakçi G; Tokgözoğlu L
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Jul; 35(7):834-40. PubMed ID: 22486778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between TightRail rotating dilator sheath and GlideLight laser sheath for transvenous lead extraction.
    Qin D; Chokshi M; Sabeh MK; Maan A; Bapat A; Bode WD; Hanley A; Hucker WJ; Ng CY; Funamoto M; Barrett CD; Mela T
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2021 May; 44(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 33675073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes of transvenous lead extraction in octogenarians using bidirectional rotational mechanical sheaths.
    Migliore F; Pittorru R; Dall'Aglio PB; De Lazzari M; Falzone PV; Sottini S; Dentico A; Ferrieri A; Pradegan N; Bertaglia E; Iliceto S; Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Carretta D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2023 Aug; 46(8):960-968. PubMed ID: 36951180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extraction in octogenarians using powered extraction sheaths.
    Burger H; Hakmi S; Petersen J; Yildirim Y; Choi YH; Willems S; Reichenspurner H; Ziegelhoeffer T; Pecha S
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2021 Apr; 44(4):601-606. PubMed ID: 33594705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness, safety, and long-term outcomes of non-powered mechanical sheaths for transvenous lead extraction.
    Kutarski A; Czajkowski M; Pietura R; Obszanski B; Polewczyk A; Jachec W; Polewczyk M; Mlynarczyk K; Grabowski M; Opolski G
    Europace; 2018 Aug; 20(8):1324-1333. PubMed ID: 29016781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Usefulness of the controlled-rotation dilator sheath "Evolution RL" for extraction of old leads in two Japanese centers - An experience in use.
    Tabata H; Okada A; Kobayashi H; Shoin W; Okano T; Higuchi S; Yagishita D; Ebisawa S; Motoki H; Shoda M; Kuwahara K
    J Cardiol; 2022 Oct; 80(4):339-343. PubMed ID: 35701313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safe and effective transvenous lead extraction for elderly patients utilizing non-laser and laser tools: a single-center experience in Japan.
    Okada A; Tabata H; Shoda M; Shoin W; Kobayashi H; Okano T; Yoshie K; Kato K; Saigusa T; Ebisawa S; Motoki H; Kuwahara K
    Heart Vessels; 2021 Jun; 36(6):882-889. PubMed ID: 33394103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results of the Patient-Related Outcomes of Mechanical lead Extraction Techniques (PROMET) study: a multicentre retrospective study on advanced mechanical lead extraction techniques.
    Starck CT; Gonzalez E; Al-Razzo O; Mazzone P; Delnoy PP; Breitenstein A; Steffel J; Eulert-Grehn J; Lanmüller P; Melillo F; Marzi A; Sohal M; Domenichini G; Gallagher MM
    Europace; 2020 Jul; 22(7):1103-1110. PubMed ID: 32447388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extraction of very old leads.
    Pecha S; Ziegelhoeffer T; Yildirim Y; Choi YH; Willems S; Reichenspurner H; Burger H; Hakmi S
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2021 Apr; 32(3):402-407. PubMed ID: 33257960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-laser percutaneous extraction of pacemaker and defibrillation leads: a decade of progress.
    Domenichini G; Gonna H; Sharma R; Conti S; Fiorista L; Jones S; Arthur M; Adhya S; Jahangiri M; Rowland E; Gallagher MM
    Europace; 2017 Sep; 19(9):1521-1526. PubMed ID: 28340095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes and costs associated with two different lead-extraction approaches: a single-centre study.
    Gaubert M; Giorgi R; Franceschi F; Koutbi-Franceschi L; Gitenay E; Maille B; Deharo JC
    Europace; 2017 Oct; 19(10):1710-1716. PubMed ID: 27733470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.