BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33724991)

  • 1. Increased visual and cognitive demands emphasize the importance of meeting visual needs at all distances while driving.
    Patoine A; Mikula L; Mejía-Romero S; Michaels J; Keruzoré O; Chaumillon R; Bernardin D; Faubert J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247254. PubMed ID: 33724991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eye-head coordination and dynamic visual scanning as indicators of visuo-cognitive demands in driving simulator.
    Mikula L; Mejía-Romero S; Chaumillon R; Patoine A; Lugo E; Bernardin D; Faubert J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0240201. PubMed ID: 33382720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effects of Cognitive and Visual Workload on Peripheral Detection in the Detection Response Task.
    van Winsum W
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):855-869. PubMed ID: 29791188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structural equation model analysis for the evaluation of overall driving performance: A driving simulator study focusing on driver distraction.
    Papantoniou P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):317-325. PubMed ID: 29087738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effects of Age, Distraction, and Simulated Central Vision Impairment on Hazard Detection in a Driving Simulator.
    Zhang CT; Bowers AR; Savage SW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Apr; 97(4):239-248. PubMed ID: 32304533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is improved lane keeping during cognitive load caused by increased physical arousal or gaze concentration toward the road center?
    Li P; Markkula G; Li Y; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():65-74. PubMed ID: 29656076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jul; 92():230-9. PubMed ID: 27107472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of alcohol intoxication goggles (fatal vision goggles) with a concurrent cognitive task on simulated driving performance.
    Irwin C; Desbrow B; McCartney D
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(8):777-782. PubMed ID: 31725332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optic Flow and Tunnel Vision in the Detection Response Task.
    van Winsum W
    Hum Factors; 2019 Sep; 61(6):992-1003. PubMed ID: 30707630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of age and auditory and visual dual tasks on closed-road driving performance.
    Chaparro A; Wood JM; Carberry T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 82(8):747-54. PubMed ID: 16127341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study.
    Wandtner B; Schumacher M; Schmidt EA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 27082493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identifying cognitive distraction using steering wheel reversal rates.
    Kountouriotis GK; Spyridakos P; Carsten OMJ; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():39-45. PubMed ID: 27497055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual attention and older drivers: the contribution of inhibition of return to safe driving.
    Bédard M; Leonard E; McAuliffe J; Weaver B; Gibbons C; Dubois S
    Exp Aging Res; 2006; 32(2):119-35. PubMed ID: 16531357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concurrent processing of vehicle lane keeping and speech comprehension tasks.
    Cao S; Liu Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Oct; 59():46-54. PubMed ID: 23764876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of brake lights while distracted: Separating peripheral vision from cognitive load.
    Wolfe B; Sawyer BD; Kosovicheva A; Reimer B; Rosenholtz R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2798-2813. PubMed ID: 31222659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of cognitive and visual loads on driving performance after take-over request (TOR) in automated driving.
    Choi D; Sato T; Ando T; Abe T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
    Appl Ergon; 2020 May; 85():103074. PubMed ID: 32174362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Older drivers and rapid deceleration events: Salisbury Eye Evaluation Driving Study.
    Keay L; Munoz B; Duncan DD; Hahn D; Baldwin K; Turano KA; Munro CA; Bandeen-Roche K; West SK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():279-85. PubMed ID: 22742775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual and cognitive predictors of performance on brake reaction test: Salisbury eye evaluation driving study.
    Zhang L; Baldwin K; Munoz B; Munro C; Turano K; Hassan S; Lyketsos C; Bandeen-Roche K; West SK
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2007; 14(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 17896300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual load and variability of muscle activation: Effects on reactive driving of older adults.
    Kim C; Yacoubi B; Christou EA
    Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Feb; 63():172-181. PubMed ID: 30562674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity of subjective questionnaires to cognitive loading while driving with navigation aids: a pilot study.
    Smyth CC
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 May; 78(5 Suppl):B39-50. PubMed ID: 17547303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.