These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33725009)

  • 1. Candidate name order effects in New Hampshire: Evidence from primaries and from general elections with party column ballots.
    MacInnis B; Miller JM; Krosnick JA; Below C; Lindner M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0248049. PubMed ID: 33725009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Handedness and the 2016 U.S. Primaries: consistent handedness predicts support for Donald Trump among republicans, but gender predicts support for Hillary Clinton among democrats.
    Prichard EC; Christman SD
    Laterality; 2020 Nov; 25(6):641-653. PubMed ID: 32842873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Presidential, But Not Prime Minister, Candidates With Lower Pitched Voices Stand a Better Chance of Winning the Election in Conservative Countries.
    Banai B; Laustsen L; Banai IP; Bovan K
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918758736. PubMed ID: 29911405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Elections, news cycles, and attention to disasters.
    Bright CF
    Disaster Prev Manag; 2017; 26(4):471-478. PubMed ID: 30443109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. They Saw a Debate: Political Polarization Is Associated with Greater Multivariate Neural Synchrony When Viewing the Opposing Candidate Speak.
    Broom TW; Stahl JL; Ping EEC; Wagner DD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Dec; 35(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 35802592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Entropic Analysis of Votes Expressed in Italian Elections between 1948 and 2018.
    Marmani S; Ficcadenti V; Kaur P; Dhesi G
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 May; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33286295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. House Republicans were rewarded for supporting Donald Trump's 'stop the steal' efforts.
    Bartels LM; Carnes N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Aug; 120(34):e2309072120. PubMed ID: 37579164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual priming and framing of the 2016 GOP and Democratic Party presidential primary debates.
    Stewart PA; Eubanks AD; Miller J
    Politics Life Sci; 2019 May; 38(1):14-31. PubMed ID: 31094672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tactical voting in plurality elections.
    Araújo NA; Andrade JS; Herrmann HJ
    PLoS One; 2010 Sep; 5(9):e12446. PubMed ID: 20856800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The abortion issue in the 1980 elections.
    Granberg D; Burlison J
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(5):231-8. PubMed ID: 6653742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Psychobiographical and Psycho-Political Comparison of Clinton and Trump.
    Elovitz PH
    J Psychohist; 2016; 44(2):90-113. PubMed ID: 29442485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When the Party Decides: The Effects of Facial Competence and Dominance on Internal Nominations of Political Candidates.
    Laustsen L; Petersen MB
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704917732005. PubMed ID: 29911407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. County community health associations of net voting shift in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Wasfy JH; Stewart C; Bhambhani V
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185051. PubMed ID: 28968415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Demographic change and the 2016 presidential election.
    Maggio C
    Soc Sci Res; 2021 Mar; 95():102459. PubMed ID: 33653583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gains in health insurance coverage explain variation in Democratic vote share in the 2008-2016 presidential elections.
    Hollingsworth A; Soni A; Carroll AE; Cawley J; Simon K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214206. PubMed ID: 30946752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Symbolic disempowerment and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential election: Mental health responses among Latinx and white populations.
    Morey BN; García SJ; Nieri T; Bruckner TA; Link BG
    Soc Sci Med; 2021 Nov; 289():114417. PubMed ID: 34656819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian inference on proportional elections.
    Brunello GH; Nakano EY
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0116924. PubMed ID: 25786259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Public interest in Cannabis during election season: a Google Trends analysis.
    Torgerson T; Roberts W; Lester D; Khojasteh J; Vassar M
    J Cannabis Res; 2020 Sep; 2(1):31. PubMed ID: 33526135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Studying topic engagement and synergy among candidates for 2020 US Elections.
    Baxi MK; Sharma R; Mago V
    Soc Netw Anal Min; 2022; 12(1):136. PubMed ID: 36118938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.