These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33725202)

  • 1. Watching others in a positive state does not induce optimism bias in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), but leads to behaviour indicative of competition.
    Adriaense JEC; Šlipogor V; Hintze S; Marshall L; Lamm C; Bugnyar T
    Anim Cogn; 2021 Sep; 24(5):1039-1056. PubMed ID: 33725202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Negative emotional contagion and cognitive bias in common ravens (
    Adriaense JEC; Martin JS; Schiestl M; Lamm C; Bugnyar T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Jun; 116(23):11547-11552. PubMed ID: 31110007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognitive bias in rats evoked by ultrasonic vocalizations suggests emotional contagion.
    Saito Y; Yuki S; Seki Y; Kagawa H; Okanoya K
    Behav Processes; 2016 Nov; 132():5-11. PubMed ID: 27591850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of infrared thermography to investigate emotions in common marmosets.
    Ermatinger FA; Brügger RK; Burkart JM
    Physiol Behav; 2019 Nov; 211():112672. PubMed ID: 31487492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of cognitive bias as a welfare tool in poultry.
    Košťál Ľ; Skalná Z; Pichová K
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Aug; 98(Supplement_1):S63-S79. PubMed ID: 32016360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. True imitation in marmosets.
    Voelkl B; Huber L
    Anim Behav; 2000 Aug; 60(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 10973721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High emotional reactivity toward an experimenter affects participation, but not performance, in cognitive tests with common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).
    Schubiger MN; Wüstholz FL; Wunder A; Burkart JM
    Anim Cogn; 2015 May; 18(3):701-12. PubMed ID: 25636914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimism, pessimism and judgement bias in animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lagisz M; Zidar J; Nakagawa S; Neville V; Sorato E; Paul ES; Bateson M; Mendl M; Løvlie H
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2020 Nov; 118():3-17. PubMed ID: 32682742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early evidence for emotional play contagion in juvenile ravens.
    Wenig K; Boucherie PH; Bugnyar T
    Anim Cogn; 2021 Jul; 24(4):717-729. PubMed ID: 33420859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of acute dopaminergic and serotonergic manipulations in the ACI paradigm depend on the basal valence of cognitive judgement bias in rats.
    Golebiowska J; Rygula R
    Behav Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 327():133-143. PubMed ID: 28212943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the emotional states of dairy cows housed with or without their calves.
    Neave HW; Rault JL; Bateson M; Hvidtfeldt Jensen E; Bak Jensen M
    J Dairy Sci; 2024 Feb; 107(2):1085-1101. PubMed ID: 37709022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring Cognitive Judgement Bias in Rats Using the Ambiguous-Cue Interpretation Test.
    Papciak J; Rygula R
    Curr Protoc Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 78():9.57.1-9.57.22. PubMed ID: 28046201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Canine sense and sensibility: tipping points and response latency variability as an optimism index in a canine judgement bias assessment.
    Starling MJ; Branson N; Cody D; Starling TR; McGreevy PD
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e107794. PubMed ID: 25229458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emotional contagion in mice: the role of familiarity.
    Gonzalez-Liencres C; Juckel G; Tas C; Friebe A; Brüne M
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 263():16-21. PubMed ID: 24480421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) do not utilize social information in three simultaneous social foraging tasks.
    Voelkl B; Huber L
    Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 16969636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring emotional contagion in zebrafish: A virtual-demonstrator study of positive and negative emotions.
    Burbano D; Senthilkumar S; Manzini MC
    Behav Processes; 2023 Nov; 213():104961. PubMed ID: 37897852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gaze patterns and brain activations in humans and marmosets in the Frith-Happé theory-of-mind animation task.
    Dureux A; Zanini A; Selvanayagam J; Menon RS; Everling S
    Elife; 2023 Jul; 12():. PubMed ID: 37449983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technology or ecology? New tools to assess cognitive judgement bias in mice.
    Krakenberg V; Woigk I; Garcia Rodriguez L; Kästner N; Kaiser S; Sachser N; Richter SH
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 362():279-287. PubMed ID: 30654122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Making Decisions under Ambiguity: Judgment Bias Tasks for Assessing Emotional State in Animals.
    Roelofs S; Boleij H; Nordquist RE; van der Staay FJ
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2016; 10():119. PubMed ID: 27375454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.