These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33725522)

  • 1. Development of axial compression and combined axial compression and torque loading configurations to reproduce strain in the implanted femur during activities of daily living.
    Chen X; Myers CA; Clary CW; DeWall RJ; Fritz B; Blauth M; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2021 May; 120():110363. PubMed ID: 33725522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simplified Mechanical Tests Can Simulate Physiological Mechanics of a Fixation Construct for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures.
    Chen X; Myers CA; Clary CW; DeWall RJ; Fritz B; Blauth M; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2022 Mar; 144(3):. PubMed ID: 34505126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A biomechanical study on the laminate stacking sequence in composite bone plates for vancouver femur B1 fracture fixation.
    Dhason R; Roy S; Datta S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Nov; 196():105680. PubMed ID: 32763643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A fatigue loading model for investigation of iatrogenic subtrochanteric fractures of the femur.
    Tsai AG; Reich MS; Bensusan J; Ashworth T; Marcus RE; Akkus O
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013; 28(9-10):981-7. PubMed ID: 24125692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of muscle forces on femoral strain distribution.
    Duda GN; Heller M; Albinger J; Schulz O; Schneider E; Claes L
    J Biomech; 1998 Sep; 31(9):841-6. PubMed ID: 9802785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of femur strain under different loading scenarios: Experimental testing.
    Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Zhang Y; Gu Y
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Jan; 235(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 32811293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of loading configurations on numerical evaluation of failure mechanisms in an uncemented femoral prosthesis.
    Mathai B; Gupta S
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Aug; 36(8):e3353. PubMed ID: 32436357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation implants for femoral neck fractures: A comparative finite element analysis.
    Zeng W; Liu Y; Hou X
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Nov; 196():105714. PubMed ID: 32858283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finite element analysis of double-plate fixation using reversed locking compression-distal femoral plates for Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures.
    Takahashi D; Noyama Y; Asano T; Shimizu T; Irie T; Terkawi MA; Iwasaki N
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Mar; 22(1):276. PubMed ID: 33714273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femoral bone mineral density distribution is dominantly regulated by strain energy density in remodeling.
    Zhang Y; Luo Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2020; 31(3):179-190. PubMed ID: 32597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The biomechanics of plate repair of periprosthetic femur fractures near the tip of a total hip implant: the effect of cable-screw position.
    Dubov A; Kim SY; Shah S; Schemitsch EH; Zdero R; Bougherara H
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Sep; 225(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 22070023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of two metaphyseal-fitting (short) femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty: study protocol for a prospective randomized clinical trial with additional biomechanical testing and finite element analysis.
    Tatani I; Panagopoulos A; Diamantakos I; Sakellaropoulos G; Pantelakis S; Megas P
    Trials; 2019 Jun; 20(1):359. PubMed ID: 31208433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of micromotion initiation of an implanted femur under physiological loads and constraints using the finite element method.
    Andreaus U; Colloca M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Jul; 223(5):589-605. PubMed ID: 19623912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of damage formation in hip arthroplasties by finite element analysis using computed tomography images.
    Abdullah AH; Todo M; Nakashima Y
    Med Eng Phys; 2017 Jun; 44():8-15. PubMed ID: 28373012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strain distribution within the human femur due to physiological and simplified loading: finite element analysis using the muscle standardized femur model.
    Polgár K; Gill HS; Viceconti M; Murray DW; O'Connor JJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(3):173-89. PubMed ID: 12807158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
    O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of muscle loading on the simulation of bone remodelling in the proximal femur.
    Bitsakos C; Kerner J; Fisher I; Amis AA
    J Biomech; 2005 Jan; 38(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 15519348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Full-field in vitro measurements and in silico predictions of strain shielding in the implanted femur after total hip arthroplasty.
    Chanda S; Dickinson A; Gupta S; Browne M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2015 Aug; 229(8):549-59. PubMed ID: 26112349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The biomechanics of the T2 femoral nailing system: a comparison of synthetic femurs withfinite element analysis.
    Bougherara H; Zdero R; Miric M; Shah S; Hardisty M; Zalzal P; Schemitsch EH
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Apr; 223(3):303-14. PubMed ID: 19405436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.