These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33726623)

  • 1. Guess what? Different source-guessing strategies for old versus new information.
    Wulff L; Bell R; Mieth L; Kuhlmann BG
    Memory; 2021 Mar; 29(3):416-426. PubMed ID: 33726623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Source attributions for detected new items: Persistent evidence for schematic guessing.
    Bell R; Mieth L; Buchner A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Sep; 73(9):1407-1422. PubMed ID: 32075493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hierarchical modeling of contingency-based source monitoring: a test of the probability-matching account.
    Arnold NR; Bayen UJ; Kuhlmann BG; Vaterrodt B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Apr; 20(2):326-33. PubMed ID: 23224987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influences of Source - Item Contingency and Schematic Knowledge on Source Monitoring: Tests of the Probability-Matching Account.
    Bayen UJ; Kuhlmann BG
    J Mem Lang; 2011 Jan; 64(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 21603251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metamemory expectancy illusion and schema-consistent guessing in source monitoring.
    Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):470-496. PubMed ID: 30024249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Schema bias in source monitoring varies with encoding conditions: support for a probability-matching account.
    Kuhlmann BG; Vaterrodt B; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1365-76. PubMed ID: 22545608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When is schematic knowledge used in source monitoring?
    Spaniol J; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):631-51. PubMed ID: 12109758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring.
    Bayen UJ; Nakamura GV; Dupuis SE; Yang CL
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):480-500. PubMed ID: 10881564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is knowledge reliance in source guessing a cognitive trait? Examining stability across time and domain.
    Wulff L; Kuhlmann BG
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):256-276. PubMed ID: 31912426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inconsistency effects in source memory and compensatory schema-consistent guessing.
    Küppers V; Bayen UJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):2042-59. PubMed ID: 24628718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age-related schema reliance of judgments of learning in predicting source memory.
    Shi LZ; Tang WH; Liu XP
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2012; 19(1-2):301-18. PubMed ID: 22168505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When is guessing incorrectly better than studying for enhancing memory?
    Vaughn KE; Rawson KA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Oct; 19(5):899-905. PubMed ID: 22688538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliance on schemas in source memory: age differences and similarity of schemas.
    Besken M; Gülgöz S
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2009; 16(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 18629673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An age-related attentuation of selectivity of choice in a modified guessing task.
    Sanford AJ; Jack E; Maule AJ
    Gerontology; 1977; 23(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 830256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influences of Age and Emotion on Source Guessing: Are Older Adults More Likely to Show Fear-Relevant Illusory Correlations?
    Meyer MM; Buchner A; Bell R
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2016 Sep; 71(5):831-40. PubMed ID: 25796083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "Informed guessing in change detection": Correction to Rhodes et al. (2018).
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):2120. PubMed ID: 31657601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utilization of covariation knowledge in source monitoring: no evidence for implicit processes.
    Bröder A; Noethen D; Schütz J; Bay P
    Psychol Res; 2007 Sep; 71(5):524-38. PubMed ID: 16639615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the contributions of task expectancy in the testing and guessing benefits on recognition memory.
    Huff MJ; Yates TJ; Balota DA
    Memory; 2018 Sep; 26(8):1065-1083. PubMed ID: 29723114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metacognitive inferences in source memory judgements: the role of perceived differences in item recognition.
    Meiser T; Sattler C; Von Hecker U
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jul; 60(7):1015-40. PubMed ID: 17616917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lucky Guess? Applying Rasch Measurement Theory to Grade 5 South African Mathematics Achievement Data.
    Bansilal S; Long C; Juan A
    J Appl Meas; 2019; 20(2):206-220. PubMed ID: 31120436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.