These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33727023)

  • 1. Systematic evaluation of the impact of defacing on quality and volumetric assessments on T1-weighted MR-images.
    Bhalerao GV; Parekh P; Saini J; Venkatasubramanian G; John JP;
    J Neuroradiol; 2022 May; 49(3):250-257. PubMed ID: 33727023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Segmentation stability of human head and neck cancer medical images for radiotherapy applications under de-identification conditions: Benchmarking data sharing and artificial intelligence use-cases.
    Sahlsten J; Wahid KA; Glerean E; Jaskari J; Naser MA; He R; Kann BH; Mäkitie A; Fuller CD; Kaski K
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1120392. PubMed ID: 36925936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. De-identification procedures for magnetic resonance images and the impact on structural brain measures at different ages.
    Buimer EEL; Schnack HG; Caspi Y; van Haren NEM; Milchenko M; Pas P; ; Hulshoff Pol HE; Brouwer RM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Aug; 42(11):3643-3655. PubMed ID: 33973694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facing privacy in neuroimaging: removing facial features degrades performance of image analysis methods.
    de Sitter A; Visser M; Brouwer I; Cover KS; van Schijndel RA; Eijgelaar RS; Müller DMJ; Ropele S; Kappos L; Rovira Á; Filippi M; Enzinger C; Frederiksen J; Ciccarelli O; Guttmann CRG; Wattjes MP; Witte MG; de Witt Hamer PC; Barkhof F; Vrenken H;
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1062-1074. PubMed ID: 31691120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeatability and reproducibility of FreeSurfer, FSL-SIENAX and SPM brain volumetric measurements and the effect of lesion filling in multiple sclerosis.
    Guo C; Ferreira D; Fink K; Westman E; Granberg T
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1355-1364. PubMed ID: 30242503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of a convolutional neural network to the quality control of MRI defacing.
    Delbarre DJ; Santos L; Ganjgahi H; Horner N; McCoy A; Westerberg H; Häring DA; Nichols TE; Mallon AM
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 Dec; 151(Pt A):106211. PubMed ID: 36327884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A technique for the deidentification of structural brain MR images.
    Bischoff-Grethe A; Ozyurt IB; Busa E; Quinn BT; Fennema-Notestine C; Clark CP; Morris S; Bondi MW; Jernigan TL; Dale AM; Brown GG; Fischl B
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Sep; 28(9):892-903. PubMed ID: 17295313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of defacing on automated brain atrophy estimation.
    Rubbert C; Wolf L; Turowski B; Hedderich DM; Gaser C; Dahnke R; Caspers J;
    Insights Imaging; 2022 Mar; 13(1):54. PubMed ID: 35348936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multisite Comparison of MRI Defacing Software Across Multiple Cohorts.
    Theyers AE; Zamyadi M; O'Reilly M; Bartha R; Symons S; MacQueen GM; Hassel S; Lerch JP; Anagnostou E; Lam RW; Frey BN; Milev R; Müller DJ; Kennedy SH; Scott CJM; Strother SC; Arnott SR
    Front Psychiatry; 2021; 12():617997. PubMed ID: 33716819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robustness of Automated Methods for Brain Volume Measurements across Different MRI Field Strengths.
    Heinen R; Bouvy WH; Mendrik AM; Viergever MA; Biessels GJ; de Bresser J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0165719. PubMed ID: 27798694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fast CSF MRI for brain segmentation; Cross-validation by comparison with 3D T1-based brain segmentation methods.
    van der Kleij LA; de Bresser J; Hendrikse J; Siero JCW; Petersen ET; De Vis JB
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0196119. PubMed ID: 29672584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hippocampus and amygdala volumes from magnetic resonance images in children: Assessing accuracy of FreeSurfer and FSL against manual segmentation.
    Schoemaker D; Buss C; Head K; Sandman CA; Davis EP; Chakravarty MM; Gauthier S; Pruessner JC
    Neuroimage; 2016 Apr; 129():1-14. PubMed ID: 26824403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brain volumes quantification from MRI in healthy controls: Assessing correlation, agreement and robustness of a convolutional neural network-based software against FreeSurfer, CAT12 and FSL.
    Chaves H; Dorr F; Costa ME; Serra MM; Slezak DF; Farez MF; Sevlever G; Yañez P; Cejas C
    J Neuroradiol; 2021 May; 48(3):147-156. PubMed ID: 33137334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Leveraging Clinical Imaging Archives for Radiomics: Reliability of Automated Methods for Brain Volume Measurement.
    Adduru VR; Michael AM; Helguera M; Baum SA; Moore GJ
    Radiology; 2017 Sep; 284(3):862-869. PubMed ID: 28448234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multi-atlas segmentation of the whole hippocampus and subfields using multiple automatically generated templates.
    Pipitone J; Park MT; Winterburn J; Lett TA; Lerch JP; Pruessner JC; Lepage M; Voineskos AN; Chakravarty MM;
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():494-512. PubMed ID: 24784800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical Feasibility of Synthetic MRI in Multiple Sclerosis: A Diagnostic and Volumetric Validation Study.
    Granberg T; Uppman M; Hashim F; Cananau C; Nordin LE; Shams S; Berglund J; Forslin Y; Aspelin P; Fredrikson S; Kristoffersen-Wiberg M
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Jun; 37(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 26797137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of automated brain segmentation using a brain phantom and patients with early Alzheimer's dementia or mild cognitive impairment.
    Fellhauer I; Zöllner FG; Schröder J; Degen C; Kong L; Essig M; Thomann PA; Schad LR
    Psychiatry Res; 2015 Sep; 233(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 26211622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative Evaluation of Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Methods for Structural MR Brain Images.
    Ganzetti M; Wenderoth N; Mantini D
    Neuroinformatics; 2016 Jan; 14(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 26306865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Synthetic MRI of Preterm Infants at Term-Equivalent Age: Evaluation of Diagnostic Image Quality and Automated Brain Volume Segmentation.
    Vanderhasselt T; Naeyaert M; Watté N; Allemeersch GJ; Raeymaeckers S; Dudink J; de Mey J; Raeymaekers H
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2020 May; 41(5):882-888. PubMed ID: 32299803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative analysis of MRI-guided attenuation correction techniques in time-of-flight brain PET/MRI.
    Mehranian A; Arabi H; Zaidi H
    Neuroimage; 2016 Apr; 130():123-133. PubMed ID: 26853602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.