173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33727451)
1. Functional evaluation of the macular area in early glaucoma using microperimetry.
Phuljhele S; Angmo D; Aalok L; Parwal S; Azad RV; Gupta V; Sihota R
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; 69(4):876-881. PubMed ID: 33727451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison between microperimetry and standard achromatic perimetry of the central visual field in eyes with glaucomatous paracentral visual-field defects.
Lima VC; Prata TS; De Moraes CG; Kim J; Seiple W; Rosen RB; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 94(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 19692366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of SLO-Microperimetry and Humphrey for evaluating macular sensitivity changes in advanced glaucoma.
Kulkarni SV; Coupland SG; Stitt DM; Hamilton J; Brownstein JJ; Damji KF
Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 48(5):406-12. PubMed ID: 24093188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Macular symmetry testing for glaucoma detection.
Bagga H; Greenfield DS; Knighton RW
J Glaucoma; 2005 Oct; 14(5):358-63. PubMed ID: 16148583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Circumpapillary optical coherence tomography angiography differences in perimetrically affected and unaffected hemispheres in primary open-angle glaucoma and the preperimetric fellow eye.
Sihota R; Shakrawal J; Azad SV; Kamble N; Dada T
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2021 May; 69(5):1120-1126. PubMed ID: 33913845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fixation behavior in advanced stage glaucoma assessed by the MicroPerimeter MP-1.
Kameda T; Tanabe T; Hangai M; Ojima T; Aikawa H; Yoshimura N
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2009 Nov; 53(6):580-587. PubMed ID: 20020235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A microperimeter that provides fixation pattern and retinal sensitivity measurement.
Sawa M; Gomi F; Toyoda A; Ikuno Y; Fujikado T; Tano Y
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2006; 50(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 16604385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Usefulness of frequency doubling technology perimetry 24-2 in glaucoma with parafoveal scotoma.
Jung KI; Kim EK; Park CK
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jun; 96(24):e6855. PubMed ID: 28614218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual rehabilitation using microperimetric acoustic biofeedback training in individuals with central scotoma.
Ratra D; Gopalakrishnan S; Dalan D; Ratra V; Damkondwar D; Laxmi G
Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Mar; 102(2):172-179. PubMed ID: 30253443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of Central Visual Field Severity in Glaucoma.
Chakravarti T; Moghimi S; Weinreb RN
J Glaucoma; 2022 Jun; 31(6):430-437. PubMed ID: 35649258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility of Microperimeter 3 (MP-3) Microperimetry in Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients.
Leisser C; Palkovits S; Hirnschall N; Georgiev S; Findl O
Ophthalmic Res; 2020; 63(3):302-308. PubMed ID: 31430750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microperimetry biofeedback training in a patient with bilateral myopic macular degeneration with central scotoma.
Raman R; Damkondwar D; Neriyanuri S; Sharma T
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 63(6):534-6. PubMed ID: 26265646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microperimetry and optical coherence tomography imaging in the fellow eye of patients with unilateral focal ischaemic glaucoma.
Yusuf IH; Jolly JK; Ratnarajan G; Salmon JF
Eye (Lond); 2018 Aug; 32(8):1372-1379. PubMed ID: 29706619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual Field Tests for Glaucoma Patients With Initial Macular Damage: Comparison Between Frequency-doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry Using 24-2 or 10-2 Visual Fields.
Park HL; Lee J; Park CK
J Glaucoma; 2018 Jul; 27(7):627-634. PubMed ID: 29750715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Central-most Visual Field Defects in Early Glaucoma.
Chakravarti T; Moghimi S; De Moraes CG; Weinreb RN
J Glaucoma; 2021 Mar; 30(3):e68-e75. PubMed ID: 33273288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microperimetry of localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects.
Orzalesi N; Miglior S; Lonati C; Rosetti L
Vision Res; 1998 Mar; 38(5):763-71. PubMed ID: 9604104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of retinal sensitivity in microperimetry with vascular density in optical coherence tomography angiography in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Zabel K; Zabel P; Kaluzna M; Lamkowski A; Jaworski D; Wietlicka-Piszcz M; Kaluzny JJ
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235571. PubMed ID: 32628706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of Functional Change in Preperimetric and Perimetric Glaucoma Using 10-2 Matrix Perimetry.
Jung KI; Park CK
Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 182():35-44. PubMed ID: 28734817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Humphrey Perimetry and Retinal Diseases].
Iijima H
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Mar; 120(3):190-208; discussion 209. PubMed ID: 27164757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Macular structure parameters as an automated indicator of paracentral scotoma in early glaucoma.
Kimura Y; Hangai M; Matsumoto A; Akagi T; Ikeda HO; Ohkubo S; Sugiyama K; Iwase A; Araie M; Yoshimura N
Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 156(5):907-917.e1. PubMed ID: 23972895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
