These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33727459)

  • 21. Validation and reproducibility of the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter in the detection of glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Cui QN; Gogt P; Lam JM; Siraj S; Hark LA; Myers JS; Katz LJ; Waisbourd M
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2019; 12(4):577-581. PubMed ID: 31024809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Introducing the 24-2C Visual Field Test in Neuro-Ophthalmology.
    Yamane MLM; Odel JG
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2021 Dec; 41(4):e606-e611. PubMed ID: 33417411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between Octopus 900 and Goldmann kinetic visual fields.
    Rowe FJ; Rowlands A
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():214829. PubMed ID: 24587983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of static automated perimetry and semi-automated kinetic perimetry in patients with bilateral visible optic nerve head drusen.
    Nowomiejska K; Rejdak R; Zagorski Z; Zarnowski T
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Nov; 87(7):801-5. PubMed ID: 18721249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative Analysis of Visual Field Plotting by Octopus Interzeag 1-2-3, Humphrey Field Analyser II and Frequency Doubling Perimetry in Glaucoma Patients in South Indian Population.
    Rajalakshmi AR; Suma E; Prabhu DR
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Jul; 9(7):NC01-3. PubMed ID: 26393152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Entoptic perimetry screening for central diabetic scotomas and macular edema.
    Brown JC; Kylstra JA; Mah ML
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Apr; 107(4):755-9. PubMed ID: 10768339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multifocal objective perimetry compared with Humphrey full-threshold perimetry in patients with optic neuritis.
    Pakrou N; Casson R; Kaines A; Selva D
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 34(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 16925704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Automated perimetry and neuro-ophthalmology. Topographic correlation].
    Muñoz Negrete FJ; Rebolleda G
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2002 Aug; 77(8):413-28. PubMed ID: 12185617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Uniocular and binocular fields of rotation measures: Octopus versus Goldmann.
    Rowe FJ; Hanif S
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Jun; 249(6):909-19. PubMed ID: 21243371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Peristat: a computer-based perimetry self-test for cost-effective population screening of glaucoma.
    Ianchulev T; Pham P; Makarov V; Francis B; Minckler D
    Curr Eye Res; 2005 Jan; 30(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15875358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Visual field defects in 169 cases of pituitary adenomas].
    Shen MQ; Ye W; Zhang YY; Chen J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 45(12):1074-9. PubMed ID: 20193428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Automatic (Octopus) and manual (Goldmann) perimetry in glaucoma.
    Schmied U
    Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1980; 213(4):239-44. PubMed ID: 6906155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Spatial agreement between Goldmann visual field defects and fundus autofluorescence in patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy.
    Jack LS; Agarwal A; Sepah YJ; Nguyen QD
    J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect; 2016 Dec; 6(1):18. PubMed ID: 27246316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Role of frequency doubling perimetry in detecting neuro-ophthalmic visual field defects.
    Thomas D; Thomas R; Muliyil JP; George R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 131(6):734-41. PubMed ID: 11384569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fluctuations on the Humphrey and Octopus perimeters.
    Brenton RS; Argus WA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1987 May; 28(5):767-71. PubMed ID: 3570687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Correlation of macular structure and function in a boy with primary foveomacular retinitis and sequence of changes over 5 years.
    Badhani A; Padhi TR; Panda GK; Mukherjee S; Das T; Jalali S
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 28451988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Is visual field evaluation using multiple correlations and linear regressions useful? An evaluation of Delphi perimetry.
    Wishart PK; Wardrop DR; Kosmin AS
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Jul; 236(7):493-500. PubMed ID: 9672794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss.
    Goldberg I; Graham SL; Klistorner AI
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jan; 133(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11755837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Quantification and progression of the visual field defect in glaucoma without hypertension, glaucoma simplex and pigmentary glaucoma. A clinical study with the Delta Program of the 201 Octopus perimeter].
    Gramer E; Althaus G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1987 Sep; 191(3):184-98. PubMed ID: 3682683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of semiautomated versus manual Goldmann kinetic perimetry in patients with visually significant glaucoma.
    Ramirez AM; Chaya CJ; Gordon LK; Giaconi JA
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Mar; 17(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 18344756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.