These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33727512)

  • 1. Impact of a longitudinal faculty development program on the quality of multiple-choice question item writing in medical education.
    Owolabi LF; Adamu B; Taura MG; Isa AI; Jibo AM; Abdul-Razek R; Alharthi MM; Alghamdi M
    Ann Afr Med; 2021; 20(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 33727512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.
    Abdulghani HM; Irshad M; Haque S; Ahmad T; Sattar K; Khalil MS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185895. PubMed ID: 29016659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Role of Faculty Development in Improving the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in Dental Education.
    Shaikh S; Kannan SK; Naqvi ZA; Pasha Z; Ahamad M
    J Dent Educ; 2020 Mar; 84(3):316-322. PubMed ID: 32176343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Faculty development on item writing substantially improves item quality.
    Naeem N; van der Vleuten C; Alfaris EA
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2012 Aug; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 21837548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Writing Multiple Choice Questions-Has the Student Become the Master?
    Pham H; Court-Kowalski S; Chan H; Devitt P
    Teach Learn Med; 2023; 35(3):356-367. PubMed ID: 35491868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Will a Short Training Session Improve Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Quality by Dental School Faculty? A Pilot Study.
    Dellinges MA; Curtis DA
    J Dent Educ; 2017 Aug; 81(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 28765439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A One-Day Dental Faculty Workshop in Writing Multiple-Choice Questions: An Impact Evaluation.
    AlFaris E; Naeem N; Irfan F; Qureshi R; Saad H; Al Sadhan R; Abdulghani HM; Van der Vleuten C
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1305-13. PubMed ID: 26522635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Faculty Training on Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions.
    Gupta P; Meena P; Khan AM; Malhotra RK; Singh T
    Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2020; 10(3):210-214. PubMed ID: 33088746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Item Analysis of Multiple Choice Questions at the Department of Paediatrics, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
    Kheyami D; Jaradat A; Al-Shibani T; Ali FA
    Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J; 2018 Feb; 18(1):e68-e74. PubMed ID: 29666684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of MCQ and distractor use in a large first year Health Faculty Foundation Program: assessing the effects of changing from five to four options.
    Fozzard N; Pearson A; du Toit E; Naug H; Wen W; Peak IR
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):252. PubMed ID: 30404624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Knowledge of dental faculty in gulf cooperation council states of multiple-choice questions' item writing flaws.
    Kowash M; Alhobeira H; Hussein I; Al Halabi M; Khan S
    Med Educ Online; 2020 Dec; 25(1):1812224. PubMed ID: 32835640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Construct-irrelevant variance and flawed test questions: Do multiple-choice item-writing principles make any difference?
    Downing SM
    Acad Med; 2002 Oct; 77(10 Suppl):S103-4. PubMed ID: 12377719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of repeated item development training on the prediction of medical faculty members' item difficulty index.
    Lee HY; Yune SJ; Lee SY; Im S; Kam BS
    BMC Med Educ; 2024 May; 24(1):599. PubMed ID: 38816855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Knierim A; Hayes SK; Ware J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2006 Dec; 26(8):662-71. PubMed ID: 17014932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Education techniques for lifelong learning: writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and self-assessment modules.
    Collins J
    Radiographics; 2006; 26(2):543-51. PubMed ID: 16549616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of a One-Day Workshop on the Quality of Framing Multiple Choice Questions in Physiology in a Medical College in India.
    Dhanvijay AKD; Dhokane N; Balgote S; Kumari A; Juhi A; Mondal H; Gupta P
    Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e44049. PubMed ID: 37746478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The optimal number of options for multiple-choice questions on high-stakes tests: application of a revised index for detecting nonfunctional distractors.
    Raymond MR; Stevens C; Bucak SD
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2019 Mar; 24(1):141-150. PubMed ID: 30362027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Item analysis: the impact of distractor efficiency on the difficulty index and discrimination power of multiple-choice items.
    Rezigalla AA; Eleragi AMESA; Elhussein AB; Alfaifi J; ALGhamdi MA; Al Ameer AY; Yahia AIO; Mohammed OA; Adam MIE
    BMC Med Educ; 2024 Apr; 24(1):445. PubMed ID: 38658912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using Automatic Item Generation to Improve the Quality of MCQ Distractors.
    Lai H; Gierl MJ; Touchie C; Pugh D; Boulais AP; De Champlain A
    Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 26849247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.