86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3372863)
1. Sharp mechanical tuning in a cochlear model without negative damping.
Kolston PJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Apr; 83(4):1481-7. PubMed ID: 3372863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An active cochlear model showing sharp tuning and high sensitivity.
Neely ST; Kim DO
Hear Res; 1983 Feb; 9(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 6833157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Realistic mechanical tuning in a micromechanical cochlear model.
Kolston PJ; Viergever MA; de Boer E; Diependaal RJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jul; 86(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 2754106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling the active process of the cochlea: phase relations, amplification, and spontaneous oscillation.
Markin VS; Hudspeth AJ
Biophys J; 1995 Jul; 69(1):138-47. PubMed ID: 7669891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical tuning and amplification within the apex of the guinea pig cochlea.
Recio-Spinoso A; Oghalai JS
J Physiol; 2017 Jul; 595(13):4549-4561. PubMed ID: 28382742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cochlear micromechanics--a physical model of transduction.
Allen JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Dec; 68(6):1660-70. PubMed ID: 7462465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional model calculations for guinea pig cochlea.
Steele CR; Taber LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Apr; 69(4):1107-11. PubMed ID: 7229198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A model for active elements in cochlear biomechanics.
Neely ST; Kim DO
J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 May; 79(5):1472-80. PubMed ID: 3711446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stiffness of the gerbil basilar membrane: radial and longitudinal variations.
Emadi G; Richter CP; Dallos P
J Neurophysiol; 2004 Jan; 91(1):474-88. PubMed ID: 14523077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The importance of phase data and model dimensionality to cochlear mechanics.
Kolston PJ
Hear Res; 2000 Jul; 145(1-2):25-36. PubMed ID: 10867274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What type of force does the cochlear amplifier produce?
Kolston PJ; de Boer E; Viergever MA; Smoorenburg GF
J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1794-801. PubMed ID: 2262635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mathematical modeling of cochlear mechanics.
Neely ST
J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jul; 78(1 Pt 2):345-52. PubMed ID: 4031241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reverse transduction measured in the isolated cochlea by laser Michelson interferometry.
Mammano F; Ashmore JF
Nature; 1993 Oct; 365(6449):838-41. PubMed ID: 8413667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-compartment passive frequency domain cochlea model allowing independent fluid coupling to the tectorial and basilar membranes.
Cormack J; Liu Y; Nam JH; Gracewski SM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1117-25. PubMed ID: 25786927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cochlear micromechanics--a mechanism for transforming mechanical to neural tuning within the cochlea.
Allen JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 1977 Oct; 62(4):930-9. PubMed ID: 198449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The interplay between active hair bundle motility and electromotility in the cochlea.
O Maoiléidigh D; Jülicher F
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1175-90. PubMed ID: 20815454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Toward three-dimensional analysis of cochlear structure.
Steele CR
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1999; 61(5):238-51. PubMed ID: 10529645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mapping the cochlear partition's stiffness to its cellular architecture.
Olson ES; Mountain DC
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):395-400. PubMed ID: 8120250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Active control of waves in a cochlear model with subpartitions.
Chadwick RS; Dimitriadis EK; Iwasa KH
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Mar; 93(6):2564-9. PubMed ID: 8637914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Consequences of Location-Dependent Organ of Corti Micro-Mechanics.
Liu Y; Gracewski SM; Nam JH
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133284. PubMed ID: 26317521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
