133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33730097)
1. Reevaluating pragmatic reasoning in language games.
Sikos L; Venhuizen NJ; Drenhaus H; Crocker MW
PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0248388. PubMed ID: 33730097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting pragmatic reasoning in language games.
Frank MC; Goodman ND
Science; 2012 May; 336(6084):998. PubMed ID: 22628647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of Disfluency in Online Interpretation of Deception.
Loy JE; Rohde H; Corley M
Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6():1434-1456. PubMed ID: 27246116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Logic, Probability, and Pragmatics in Syllogistic Reasoning.
Tessler MH; Tenenbaum JB; Goodman ND
Top Cogn Sci; 2022 Jul; 14(3):574-601. PubMed ID: 35005842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. She adapts to her student: An expert pragmatic speaker tailoring her referring expressions to the Layman listener.
Greco C; Bagade D; Le DT; Bernardi R
Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1017204. PubMed ID: 36967832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Auditory-Articulatory Neural Alignment between Listener and Speaker during Verbal Communication.
Liu L; Zhang Y; Zhou Q; Garrett DD; Lu C; Chen A; Qiu J; Ding G
Cereb Cortex; 2020 Mar; 30(3):942-951. PubMed ID: 31318013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners.
Walshe M; Miller N; Leahy M; Murray A
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(6):633-48. PubMed ID: 18608608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Limits to the Rational Production of Discourse Connectives.
Yung F; Jungbluth J; Demberg V
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():660730. PubMed ID: 34122244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference.
Goodman ND; Frank MC
Trends Cogn Sci; 2016 Nov; 20(11):818-829. PubMed ID: 27692852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neural mechanisms for selectively tuning in to the target speaker in a naturalistic noisy situation.
Dai B; Chen C; Long Y; Zheng L; Zhao H; Bai X; Liu W; Zhang Y; Liu L; Guo T; Ding G; Lu C
Nat Commun; 2018 Jun; 9(1):2405. PubMed ID: 29921937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speaker-Listener Neural Coupling Reveals an Adaptive Mechanism for Speech Comprehension in a Noisy Environment.
Li Z; Li J; Hong B; Nolte G; Engel AK; Zhang D
Cereb Cortex; 2021 Aug; 31(10):4719-4729. PubMed ID: 33969389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony.
Regel S; Coulson S; Gunter TC
Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1311():121-35. PubMed ID: 19900421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication.
Stephens GJ; Silbert LJ; Hasson U
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Aug; 107(32):14425-30. PubMed ID: 20660768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. I know what you're probably going to say: Listener adaptation to variable use of uncertainty expressions.
Schuster S; Degen J
Cognition; 2020 Oct; 203():104285. PubMed ID: 32535344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SPEAKERS' AND LISTENERS' PROCESSES IN A WORD-COMMUNICATION TASK.
ROSENBERG S; COHEN BD
Science; 1964 Sep; 145(3637):1201-3. PubMed ID: 14173413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using statistical decision theory to predict speech intelligibility. I. Model structure.
Müsch H; Buus S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jun; 109(6):2896-909. PubMed ID: 11425132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
Peng ZE; Wang LM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speakers and listeners exploit word order for communicative efficiency: A cross-linguistic investigation.
Rubio-Fernandez P; Mollica F; Jara-Ettinger J
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Mar; 150(3):583-594. PubMed ID: 32969681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Online pragmatic interpretations of scalar adjectives are affected by perceived speaker reliability.
Gardner B; Dix S; Lawrence R; Morgan C; Sullivan A; Kurumada C
PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245130. PubMed ID: 33606683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.
Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):370-395. PubMed ID: 30969910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
