These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33730097)

  • 21. A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):370-395. PubMed ID: 30969910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Listener-speaker perceived distance predicts the degree of motor contribution to speech perception.
    Bartoli E; D'Ausilio A; Berry J; Badino L; Bever T; Fadiga L
    Cereb Cortex; 2015 Feb; 25(2):281-8. PubMed ID: 24046079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. What do you know? ERP evidence for immediate use of common ground during online reference resolution.
    Sikos L; Tomlinson SB; Heins C; Grodner DJ
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():275-285. PubMed ID: 30388433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The impact of foreign accent on irony interpretation.
    Caffarra S; Michell E; Martin CD
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0200939. PubMed ID: 30089171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Warm (for Winter): Inferring Comparison Classes in Communication.
    Tessler MH; Goodman ND
    Cogn Sci; 2022 Mar; 46(3):e13095. PubMed ID: 35297089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Exhaustivity and Anti-Exhaustivity in the RSA Framework: Testing the Effect of Prior Beliefs.
    Cremers A; Wilcox EG; Spector B
    Cogn Sci; 2023 May; 47(5):e13286. PubMed ID: 37170678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of speaker and listener variables on intelligibility of dysarthric speech.
    Patel R; Usher N; Kember H; Russell S; Laures-Gore J
    J Commun Disord; 2014; 51():13-8. PubMed ID: 25113966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Are Narrow Focus Exhaustivity Inferences Bayesian Inferences?
    Schreiber A; Onea E
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():677223. PubMed ID: 34421732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Embodied communication: speakers' gestures affect listeners' actions.
    Cook SW; Tanenhaus MK
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 19682672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speaker-listener neural coupling correlates with semantic and acoustic features of naturalistic speech.
    Li Z; Hong B; Nolte G; Engel AK; Zhang D
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39012092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling.
    Franke M; Degen J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154854. PubMed ID: 27149675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of speaker gaze on listener comprehension: contrasting visual versus intentional accounts.
    Staudte M; Crocker MW; Heloir A; Kipp M
    Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):317-28. PubMed ID: 25079951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pragmatics aid referent disambiguation and word learning in young children and adults.
    Bleijlevens N; Contier F; Behne T
    Dev Sci; 2023 Jul; 26(4):e13363. PubMed ID: 36598874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Effects of the Literal Meaning of Emotional Phrases on the Identification of Vocal Emotions.
    Shigeno S
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Feb; 47(1):195-213. PubMed ID: 29080117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inferring word meanings by assuming that speakers are informative.
    Frank MC; Goodman ND
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Dec; 75():80-96. PubMed ID: 25238461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Pragmatic Account of the Weak Evidence Effect.
    Barnett SA; Griffiths TL; Hawkins RD
    Open Mind (Camb); 2022; 6():169-182. PubMed ID: 36439072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Listener effort for highly intelligible tracheoesophageal speech.
    Nagle KF; Eadie TL
    J Commun Disord; 2012; 45(3):235-45. PubMed ID: 22305772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of control samples and listener attributes on speech naturalness ratings of people who stutter.
    Carey B; Erickson S; Block S
    J Fluency Disord; 2018 Sep; 57():59-64. PubMed ID: 29223687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: talker-, listener-, and item-related factors.
    Bradlow AR; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):2074-85. PubMed ID: 10530030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of speaker gender on listener judgments of tracheoesophageal speech.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC; Hansen K; Beaudin PG
    J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 17055223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.