These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3373025)

  • 1. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in biopsied tissue specimens by using in situ DNA hybridization.
    Horn JE; Kappus EW; Falkow S; Quinn TC
    J Infect Dis; 1988 Jun; 157(6):1249-53. PubMed ID: 3373025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in tissue culture and cervical scrapings by in situ DNA hybridization.
    Horn JE; Hammer ML; Falkow S; Quinn TC
    J Infect Dis; 1986 Jun; 153(6):1155-9. PubMed ID: 3701121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [In situ hybridization of cells infected by Chlamydia trachomatis].
    Mortemousque B; Verin P; Bebear C; de Barbeyrac B; Gendre P
    Rev Int Trach Pathol Ocul Trop Subtrop Sante Publique; 1994; 71():47-62. PubMed ID: 8724801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The discovery of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Taylor-Robinson D
    Sex Transm Infect; 2017 Feb; 93(1):10. PubMed ID: 28100758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Chlamydia trachomatis plasmid deletion mutant--what does it mean to us?
    Schachter J
    Sex Transm Dis; 2007 May; 34(5):257. PubMed ID: 17483724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new gold standard for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis?
    Monif GR
    Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 1998; 6(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 9678147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Chlamydia trachomatis strain with a 377-bp deletion in the cryptic plasmid causing false-negative nucleic acid amplification tests.
    Ripa T; Nilsson PA
    Sex Transm Dis; 2007 May; 34(5):255-6. PubMed ID: 17483723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and the serovar determination using PCR and dot-blot hybridization].
    Saito J; Takada M
    Nihon Rinsho; 1992 Jul; 50 Suppl():412-7. PubMed ID: 1404933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple and rapid DNA extraction method for Chlamydia trachomatis detection from urogenital swabs.
    Butzler MA; Reed JL; McFall SM
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2017 Nov; 89(3):182-184. PubMed ID: 28918068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Study of Chlamydia trachomatis in chronic prostatitis].
    Maruta N
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1992 Mar; 38(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 1523985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Issues in Chlamydia trachomatis testing by nucleic acid amplification test.
    Hadgu A
    J Infect Dis; 2006 May; 193(9):1335-6; author reply 1338-9. PubMed ID: 16586375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by nucleic acid amplification testing: our evaluation suggests that CDC-recommended approaches for confirmatory testing are ill-advised.
    Schachter J; Chow JM; Howard H; Bolan G; Moncada J
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 44(7):2512-7. PubMed ID: 16825373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DNA sequencing validation of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae nucleic acid tests.
    Lee SH; Vigliotti VS; Pappu S
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Jun; 129(6):852-9. PubMed ID: 18480000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA using MagNA Pure DNA extraction and Cobas Amplicor CT/NG amplification.
    De Martino SJ; de Barbeyrac B; Piemont Y; Barthel C; Monteil H; Jaulhac B
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2006 Jun; 12(6):576-9. PubMed ID: 16700708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Diagnostic tests: Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydophila pneumoniae].
    Kishimoto T; Ando S; Ogawa M
    Nihon Rinsho; 2005 Jul; 63 Suppl 7():220-6. PubMed ID: 16111232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of penile skin swab with intra-urethral swab and first void urine for polymerase chain reaction-based diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis in male patients.
    Pittaras TE; Papaparaskevas J; Houhoula DP; Legakis NJ; Frangouli E; Katsambas A; Tsakris A; Papadogeorgakis H
    Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Dec; 35(12):999-1001. PubMed ID: 18665017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective comparison of cell cultures and nucleic acid amplification tests for laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections.
    Jespersen DJ; Flatten KS; Jones MF; Smith TF
    J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 43(10):5324-6. PubMed ID: 16208009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of lymphogranuloma venereum-associated Chlamydia trachomatis serovars by fluorescence in situ hybridisation--a proof-of-principle analysis.
    Frickmann H; Essig A; Poppert S
    Trop Med Int Health; 2014 Apr; 19(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 24720755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in the prostate by in-situ hybridization and by transmission electron microscopy.
    Corradi G; Bucsek M; Pánovics J; Verebélyi A; Kardos M; Kádár A; Frang D
    Int J Androl; 1996 Apr; 19(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 8737042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by in situ hybridization with sulphonated total DNA.
    Dutilh B; Bébéar C; Taylor-Robinson D; Grimont PA
    Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol; 1988; 139(1):115-27. PubMed ID: 2838062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.