150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33730563)
1. The influence of soft tissue artifacts on multi-segment foot kinematics.
Schallig W; Streekstra GJ; Hulshof CM; Kleipool RP; Dobbe JGG; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM; van den Noort JC
J Biomech; 2021 May; 120():110359. PubMed ID: 33730563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Amsterdam Foot Model: a clinically informed multi-segment foot model developed to minimize measurement errors in foot kinematics.
Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Piening M; Streekstra GJ; Maas M; van der Krogt MM; Harlaar J
J Foot Ankle Res; 2022 Jun; 15(1):46. PubMed ID: 35668453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skin marker-based versus bone morphology-based coordinate systems of the hindfoot and forefoot.
Hulshof CM; Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Streekstra GJ; Kleipool RP; Gg Dobbe J; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM
J Biomech; 2024 Mar; 166():112001. PubMed ID: 38527409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marker placement sensitivity of the Oxford and Rizzoli foot models in adults and children.
Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM
J Biomech; 2021 Sep; 126():110629. PubMed ID: 34320419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing the kinematic output of the Oxford and Rizzoli Foot Models during normal gait and voluntary pathological gait in healthy adults.
Schallig W; van den Noort JC; McCahill J; Stebbins J; Leardini A; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM
Gait Posture; 2020 Oct; 82():126-132. PubMed ID: 32920448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between the Rizzoli and Oxford foot models with independent and clustered tracking markers.
Teixeira BG; Araújo VL; Santos TRT; Magalhães FA; Resende RA; Schallig W; van der Krogt MM; Fonseca ST; Souza TR
Gait Posture; 2022 Jan; 91():48-51. PubMed ID: 34649170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The modified Shriners Hospitals for Children Greenville (mSHCG) multi-segment foot model provides clinically acceptable measurements of ankle and midfoot angles: A dual fluoroscopy study.
Roach KE; Foreman KB; MacWilliams BA; Karpos K; Nichols J; Anderson AE
Gait Posture; 2021 Mar; 85():258-265. PubMed ID: 33626450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantifying skin motion artifact error of the hindfoot and forefoot marker clusters with the optical tracking of a multi-segment foot model using single-plane fluoroscopy.
Shultz R; Kedgley AE; Jenkyn TR
Gait Posture; 2011 May; 34(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 21498078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Direct Comparison of Biplanar Videoradiography and Optical Motion Capture for Foot and Ankle Kinematics.
Kessler SE; Rainbow MJ; Lichtwark GA; Cresswell AG; D'Andrea SE; Konow N; Kelly LA
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2019; 7():199. PubMed ID: 31508415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantification of three-dimensional soft tissue artifacts in the canine hindlimb during passive stifle motion.
Lin CC; Chang CL; Lu M; Lu TW; Wu CH
BMC Vet Res; 2018 Dec; 14(1):389. PubMed ID: 30522489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the kinematics, repeatability, and reproducibility of five different multi-segment foot models.
Yoo HJ; Park HS; Lee DO; Kim SH; Park GY; Cho TJ; Lee DY
J Foot Ankle Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):1. PubMed ID: 34991669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ankle and midfoot kinetics during normal gait: a multi-segment approach.
Dixon PC; Böhm H; Döderlein L
J Biomech; 2012 Apr; 45(6):1011-6. PubMed ID: 22304842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. One- and multi-segment foot models lead to opposite results on ankle joint kinematics during gait: Implications for clinical assessment.
Pothrat C; Authier G; Viehweger E; Berton E; Rao G
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Jun; 30(5):493-9. PubMed ID: 25812728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of soft tissue artefacts on computed segmental and stifle kinematics in canine motion analysis.
Lu M; Lin CC; Lu TW; Wang SN; Wu CH
Vet Rec; 2020 Jan; 186(2):66. PubMed ID: 31409754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeatability of the modified Oxford foot model during gait in healthy adults.
Wright CJ; Arnold BL; Coffey TG; Pidcoe PE
Gait Posture; 2011 Jan; 33(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 21081275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lumbar segment-dependent soft tissue artifacts of skin markers during
Xi X; Ling Z; Wang C; Gu C; Zhan X; Yu H; Lu S; Tsai TY; Yu Y; Cheng L
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():960063. PubMed ID: 36061441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multisegment Kinematics of the Spinal Column: Soft Tissue Artifacts Assessment.
Mahallati S; Rouhani H; Preuss R; Masani K; Popovic MR
J Biomech Eng; 2016 Jul; 138(7):. PubMed ID: 27151927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitivity of the Oxford Foot Model to marker misplacement: A systematic single-case investigation.
Carty CP; Walsh HP; Gillett JG
Gait Posture; 2015 Sep; 42(3):398-401. PubMed ID: 26163347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Altered Range of Motion and Plantar Pressure in Anterior and Posterior Malaligned Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Cadaveric Gait Study.
McKearney DA; Stender CJ; Cook BK; Moore ES; Gunnell LM; Monier BC; Sangeorzan BJ; Ledoux WR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Sep; 101(18):e93. PubMed ID: 31567808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flatfoot deformity affected the kinematics of the foot and ankle in proportion to the severity of deformity.
Shin HS; Lee JH; Kim EJ; Kyung MG; Yoo HJ; Lee DY
Gait Posture; 2019 Jul; 72():123-128. PubMed ID: 31195311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
