These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33731315)

  • 21. Spino-cerebellar tDCS modulates N100 components of the P300 event related potential.
    Ruggiero F; Ferrucci R; Bocci T; Nigro M; Vergari M; Marceglia S; Barbieri S; Priori A
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Dec; 135():107231. PubMed ID: 31628894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Increases Bilateral Directed Brain Connectivity during Motor-Imagery Based Brain-Computer Interface Control.
    Baxter BS; Edelman BJ; Sohrabpour A; He B
    Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():691. PubMed ID: 29270110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cerebellar anodal tDCS increases implicit learning when strategic re-aiming is suppressed in sensorimotor adaptation.
    Leow LA; Marinovic W; Riek S; Carroll TJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179977. PubMed ID: 28686607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cerebellar patients do not benefit from cerebellar or M1 transcranial direct current stimulation during force-field reaching adaptation.
    Hulst T; John L; Küper M; van der Geest JN; Göricke SL; Donchin O; Timmann D
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Aug; 118(2):732-748. PubMed ID: 28469001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation interacts with BDNF Val66Met in motor learning.
    van der Vliet R; Jonker ZD; Louwen SC; Heuvelman M; de Vreede L; Ribbers GM; De Zeeuw CI; Donchin O; Selles RW; van der Geest JN; Frens MA
    Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(4):759-771. PubMed ID: 29680227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lobule-Specific Dosage Considerations for Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation During Healthy Aging: A Computational Modeling Study Using Age-Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging Templates.
    Rezaee Z; Dutta A
    Neuromodulation; 2020 Apr; 23(3):341-365. PubMed ID: 31995268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reversing motor adaptation deficits in the ageing brain using non-invasive stimulation.
    Panouillères MT; Joundi RA; Brittain JS; Jenkinson N
    J Physiol; 2015 Aug; 593(16):3645-55. PubMed ID: 25929230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS on Sequential Motor Response Selection.
    Jongkees BJ; Immink MA; Boer OD; Yavari F; Nitsche MA; Colzato LS
    Cerebellum; 2019 Aug; 18(4):738-749. PubMed ID: 31062282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cerebellar, but not Motor or Parietal, High-Density Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Facilitates Motor Adaptation.
    Doppelmayr M; Pixa NH; Steinberg F
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2016 Oct; 22(9):928-936. PubMed ID: 27152869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Effect of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on A Throwing Task Depends on Individual Level of Task Performance.
    Mizuguchi N; Katayama T; Kanosue K
    Neuroscience; 2018 Feb; 371():119-125. PubMed ID: 29223349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Enhancing Consolidation of a New Temporal Motor Skill by Cerebellar Noninvasive Stimulation.
    Wessel MJ; Zimerman M; Timmermann JE; Heise KF; Gerloff C; Hummel FC
    Cereb Cortex; 2016 Apr; 26(4):1660-7. PubMed ID: 25604611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modulation of linguistic prediction by TDCS of the right lateral cerebellum.
    Miall RC; Antony J; Goldsmith-Sumner A; Harding SR; McGovern C; Winter JL
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jun; 86():103-9. PubMed ID: 27126840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. No effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on force field and visuomotor reach adaptation in young and healthy subjects.
    Mamlins A; Hulst T; Donchin O; Timmann D; Claassen J
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Jun; 121(6):2112-2125. PubMed ID: 30943093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Targeting Primary Motor Versus Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortices: Proof-of-Concept Study Investigating Functional Connectivity of Thalamocortical Networks Specific to Sensory-Affective Information Processing.
    Sankarasubramanian V; Cunningham DA; Potter-Baker KA; Beall EB; Roelle SM; Varnerin NM; Machado AG; Jones SE; Lowe MJ; Plow EB
    Brain Connect; 2017 Apr; 7(3):182-196. PubMed ID: 28142257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cerebellar tDCS does not affect performance in the N-back task.
    van Wessel BW; Claire Verhage M; Holland P; Frens MA; van der Geest JN
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016; 38(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 26646653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neural correlates of unihemispheric and bihemispheric motor cortex stimulation in healthy young adults.
    Lindenberg R; Sieg MM; Meinzer M; Nachtigall L; Flöel A
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():141-9. PubMed ID: 26851696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Combining transcranial direct current stimulation with a motor-cognitive task: the impact on dual-task walking costs in older adults.
    Schneider N; Dagan M; Katz R; Thumm PC; Brozgol M; Giladi N; Manor B; Mirelman A; Hausdorff JM
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Feb; 18(1):23. PubMed ID: 33526043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differential effects of primary motor cortex and cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning in healthy individuals: A randomized double-blind sham-controlled study.
    Ehsani F; Bakhtiary AH; Jaberzadeh S; Talimkhani A; Hajihasani A
    Neurosci Res; 2016 Nov; 112():10-19. PubMed ID: 27349154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Enhancing decision-making and cognitive impulse control with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC): A randomized and sham-controlled exploratory study.
    Ouellet J; McGirr A; Van den Eynde F; Jollant F; Lepage M; Berlim MT
    J Psychiatr Res; 2015 Oct; 69():27-34. PubMed ID: 26343591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of tDCS stimulation of motor cortex and cerebellum on EEG classification of motor imagery and sensorimotor band power.
    Angulo-Sherman IN; Rodríguez-Ugarte M; Sciacca N; Iáñez E; Azorín JM
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Apr; 14(1):31. PubMed ID: 28420382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.