These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33733106)

  • 1. Descriptor Free QSAR Modeling Using Deep Learning With Long Short-Term Memory Neural Networks.
    Chakravarti SK; Alla SRM
    Front Artif Intell; 2019; 2():17. PubMed ID: 33733106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time series forecasting of new cases and new deaths rate for COVID-19 using deep learning methods.
    Ayoobi N; Sharifrazi D; Alizadehsani R; Shoeibi A; Gorriz JM; Moosaei H; Khosravi A; Nahavandi S; Gholamzadeh Chofreh A; Goni FA; Klemeš JJ; Mosavi A
    Results Phys; 2021 Aug; 27():104495. PubMed ID: 34221854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Descriptor-free QSAR: effectiveness in screening for putative inhibitors of FGFR1.
    Joel IY; Sulaimon LA; Idris MO; Adigun TO; Adisa RA; Ademoye TA; Ogunleye MO; Olaniyi TO
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2023 Mar; 41(5):2016-2032. PubMed ID: 35073829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a read-across-derived classification model for the predictions of mutagenicity data and its comparison with traditional QSAR models and expert systems.
    Pandey SK; Roy K
    Toxicology; 2023 Dec; 500():153676. PubMed ID: 37993082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combinatorial QSAR of ambergris fragrance compounds.
    Kovatcheva A; Golbraikh A; Oloff S; Xiao YD; Zheng W; Wolschann P; Buchbauer G; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(2):582-95. PubMed ID: 15032539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Multiple Linear Regressions and Neural Networks based QSAR models for the design of new antitubercular compounds.
    Ventura C; Latino DA; Martins F
    Eur J Med Chem; 2013; 70():831-45. PubMed ID: 24246731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. QSAR--how good is it in practice? Comparison of descriptor sets on an unbiased cross section of corporate data sets.
    Gedeck P; Rohde B; Bartels C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(5):1924-36. PubMed ID: 16995723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Could deep learning in neural networks improve the QSAR models?
    Gini G; Zanoli F; Gamba A; Raitano G; Benfenati E
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2019 Sep; 30(9):617-642. PubMed ID: 31460798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. QSAR modeling without descriptors using graph convolutional neural networks: the case of mutagenicity prediction.
    Hung C; Gini G
    Mol Divers; 2021 Aug; 25(3):1283-1299. PubMed ID: 34146224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Descriptor-Free Deep Learning QSAR Model for the Fraction Unbound in Human Plasma.
    Riedl M; Mukherjee S; Gauthier M
    Mol Pharm; 2023 Oct; 20(10):4984-4993. PubMed ID: 37656906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction on the mutagenicity of nitroaromatic compounds using quantum chemistry descriptors based QSAR and machine learning derived classification methods.
    Hao Y; Sun G; Fan T; Sun X; Liu Y; Zhang N; Zhao L; Zhong R; Peng Y
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Dec; 186():109822. PubMed ID: 31634658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ChemModLab: a web-based cheminformatics modeling laboratory.
    Hughes-Oliver JM; Brooks AD; Welch WJ; Khaledi MG; Hawkins D; Young SS; Patil K; Howell GW; Ng RT; Chu MT
    In Silico Biol; 2011-2012; 11(1-2):61-81. PubMed ID: 22475752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. LSTM Model for Prediction of Heart Failure in Big Data.
    Maragatham G; Devi S
    J Med Syst; 2019 Mar; 43(5):111. PubMed ID: 30888519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A large comparison of integrated SAR/QSAR models of the Ames test for mutagenicity
    Benfenati E; Golbamaki A; Raitano G; Roncaglioni A; Manganelli S; Lemke F; Norinder U; Lo Piparo E; Honma M; Manganaro A; Gini G
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2018 Aug; 29(8):591-611. PubMed ID: 30052064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three new consensus QSAR models for the prediction of Ames genotoxicity.
    Votano JR; Parham M; Hall LH; Kier LB; Oloff S; Tropsha A; Xie Q; Tong W
    Mutagenesis; 2004 Sep; 19(5):365-77. PubMed ID: 15388809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Essential and desirable characteristics of ecotoxicity quantitative structure-activity relationships.
    Schultz TW; Cronin MT
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Mar; 22(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 12627648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring the QSAR's predictive truthfulness of the novel N-tuple discrete derivative indices on benchmark datasets.
    Martínez-Santiago O; Marrero-Ponce Y; Vivas-Reyes R; Rivera-Borroto OM; Hurtado E; Treto-Suarez MA; Ramos Y; Vergara-Murillo F; Orozco-Ugarriza ME; Martínez-López Y
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 May; 28(5):367-389. PubMed ID: 28590848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MABAL: a Novel Deep-Learning Architecture for Machine-Assisted Bone Age Labeling.
    Mutasa S; Chang PD; Ruzal-Shapiro C; Ayyala R
    J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):513-519. PubMed ID: 29404850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Monte Carlo technique as a tool to predict LOAEL.
    Veselinović JB; Veselinović AM; Toropova AP; Toropov AA
    Eur J Med Chem; 2016 Jun; 116():71-75. PubMed ID: 27060758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dependence of QSAR models on the selection of trial descriptor sets: a demonstration using nanotoxicity endpoints of decorated nanotubes.
    Shao CY; Chen SZ; Su BH; Tseng YJ; Esposito EX; Hopfinger AJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jan; 53(1):142-58. PubMed ID: 23252880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.