These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33733277)

  • 1. Determining the stability of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values in future generations in commercial pig populations.
    Hollifield MK; Lourenco D; Bermann M; Howard JT; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Apr; 99(4):. PubMed ID: 33733277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.
    Fangmann A; Sharifi RA; Heinkel J; Danowski K; Schrade H; Erbe M; Simianer H
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1434-1443. PubMed ID: 28464085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating the persistence of accuracy of genomic predictions over time in broilers.
    Hidalgo J; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Masuda Y; Breen V; Hawken R; Bermann M; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Sep; 99(9):. PubMed ID: 34378776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Persistence of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values over generations in layer chickens.
    Wolc A; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Preisinger R; Habier D; Fernando R; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Jun; 43(1):23. PubMed ID: 21693035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of genotyping strategy on the accuracy of genomic prediction in simulated populations of purebred swine.
    Li X; Zhang Z; Liu X; Chen Y
    Animal; 2019 Sep; 13(9):1804-1810. PubMed ID: 30616709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
    Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Boundaries for genotype, phenotype, and pedigree truncation in genomic evaluations in pigs.
    Bussiman F; Chen CY; Holl J; Bermann M; Legarra A; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37584978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations?
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Lawlor TJ; Forni S; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3930-42. PubMed ID: 24679931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of single-step GBLUP genomic predictions from threshold models using the linear regression method: An application in chicken mortality.
    Bermann M; Legarra A; Hollifield MK; Masuda Y; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2021 Jan; 138(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 32985749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic prediction using pooled data in a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction framework.
    Baller JL; Kachman SD; Kuehn LA; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32497209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic selection models double the accuracy of predicted breeding values for bacterial cold water disease resistance compared to a traditional pedigree-based model in rainbow trout aquaculture.
    Vallejo RL; Leeds TD; Gao G; Parsons JE; Martin KE; Evenhuis JP; Fragomeni BO; Wiens GD; Palti Y
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):17. PubMed ID: 28148220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of breeding values in small genotyped populations using different sources of external information-A simulation study.
    Andonov S; Lourenco DAL; Fragomeni BO; Masuda Y; Pocrnic I; Tsuruta S; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jan; 100(1):395-401. PubMed ID: 28341049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficient large-scale single-step evaluations and indirect genomic prediction of genotyped selection candidates.
    Vandenplas J; Ten Napel J; Darbaghshahi SN; Evans R; Calus MPL; Veerkamp R; Cromie A; Mäntysaari EA; Strandén I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jun; 55(1):37. PubMed ID: 37291510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
    Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact and utility of shallow pedigree using single-step genomic BLUP for prediction of unbiased genomic breeding values.
    Gowane GR; Alex R; Mukherjee A; Vohra V
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2022 Oct; 54(6):339. PubMed ID: 36210357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of conventional BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP evaluations for yearling weight and carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle using single trait and multi-trait models.
    Mehrban H; Lee DH; Naserkheil M; Moradi MH; Ibáñez-Escriche N
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223352. PubMed ID: 31609979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Derivation of indirect predictions using genomic recursions across generations in a broiler population.
    Hidalgo J; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Bermann M; Breen V; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37837636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.