These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33733277)

  • 21. Development of genomic predictions for harvest and carcass weight in channel catfish.
    Garcia ALS; Bosworth B; Waldbieser G; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):66. PubMed ID: 30547740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genomic selection in American mink (Neovison vison) using a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction model for size and quality traits graded on live mink.
    Villumsen TM; Su G; Guldbrandtsen B; Asp T; Lund MS
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Jan; 99(1):. PubMed ID: 33515480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Changes in genomic predictions when new information is added.
    Hidalgo J; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Masuda Y; Miller S; Bermann M; Garcia ALS; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Feb; 99(2):. PubMed ID: 33544869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Core-dependent changes in genomic predictions using the Algorithm for Proven and Young in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.
    Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Pocrnic I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Dec; 98(12):. PubMed ID: 33211798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Crossbred evaluations using single-step genomic BLUP and algorithm for proven and young with different sources of data1.
    Pocrnic I; Lourenco DAL; Chen CY; Herring WO; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1513-1522. PubMed ID: 30726939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Current status of genomic evaluation.
    Misztal I; Lourenco D; Legarra A
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Apr; 98(4):. PubMed ID: 32267923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of genomic prediction using deregressed breeding values estimated from purebred and crossbred offspring phenotypes in pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Veroneze R; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26440000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor to enhance the mitigation of seasonal losses due to heat stress in pigs.
    Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Bradford HL; Gray KA; Huang Y; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Dec; 94(12):5004-5013. PubMed ID: 28046178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study1.
    Maiorano AM; Assen A; Bijma P; Chen CY; Silva JAIV; Herring WO; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Lourenco DAL
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(8):3237-3245. PubMed ID: 31240314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
    Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of genome-enabled prediction exploring purebred and crossbred pig populations.
    Veroneze R; Lopes MS; Hidalgo AM; Guimarães SE; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Lopes PS; Knol EF; M van Arendonk JA; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Oct; 93(10):4684-91. PubMed ID: 26523561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genomic prediction of reproduction traits for Merino sheep.
    Bolormaa S; Brown DJ; Swan AA; van der Werf JHJ; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
    Anim Genet; 2017 Jun; 48(3):338-348. PubMed ID: 28211150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genomic prediction ability for feed efficiency traits using different models and pseudo-phenotypes under several validation strategies in Nelore cattle.
    Brunes LC; Baldi F; Lopes FB; Narciso MG; Lobo RB; Espigolan R; Costa MFO; Magnabosco CU
    Animal; 2021 Feb; 15(2):100085. PubMed ID: 33573965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
    Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Weighted single-step genomic BLUP improves accuracy of genomic breeding values for protein content in French dairy goats: a quantitative trait influenced by a major gene.
    Teissier M; Larroque H; Robert-Granié C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Jun; 50(1):31. PubMed ID: 29907084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Crossbreed evaluations in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor using adjusted realized relationship matrices.
    Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Fragomeni BO; Chen CY; Herring WO; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):909-19. PubMed ID: 27065253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Technical note: Impact of pedigree depth on convergence of single-step genomic BLUP in a purebred swine population.
    Pocrnic I; Lourenco DAL; Bradford HL; Chen CY; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3391-3395. PubMed ID: 28805917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers.
    Heidaritabar M; Wolc A; Arango J; Zeng J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Bastiaansen JW; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):334-46. PubMed ID: 27357473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Beef trait genetic parameters based on old and recent data and its implications for genomic predictions in Italian Simmental cattle.
    Cesarani A; Hidalgo J; Garcia A; Degano L; Vicario D; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Aug; 98(8):. PubMed ID: 32730571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genomic prediction using different estimation methodology, blending and cross-validation techniques for growth traits and visual scores in Hereford and Braford cattle.
    Campos GS; Reimann FA; Cardoso LL; Ferreira CER; Junqueira VS; Schmidt PI; Braccini Neto J; Yokoo MJI; Sollero BP; Boligon AA; Cardoso FF
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Jun; 96(7):2579-2595. PubMed ID: 29741705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.