These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33733281)

  • 1. Comparison of refractive outcomes using Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry or IOLMaster 700 keratometry for IOL power calculation.
    Aksoy M; Asena L; Güngör SG; Küçüködük A; Akman A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Jun; 41(6):2205-2212. PubMed ID: 33733281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lower refractive prediction accuracy of total keratometry using intraocular lens formulas loaded onto a swept-source optical biometer.
    Danjo Y; Ohji R; Maeno S
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 Jan; 261(1):137-146. PubMed ID: 35881200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of refractive outcomes using conventional keratometry or total keratometry for IOL power calculation in cataract surgery.
    Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 257(12):2677-2682. PubMed ID: 31486917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Pentacam equivalent keratometry reading and IOL Master keratometry measurement in intraocular lens power calculations.
    Karunaratne N
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 41(9):825-34. PubMed ID: 23601493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraocular lens power calculations for cataract surgery after phototherapeutic keratectomy in granular corneal dystrophy type 2.
    Jung SH; Han KE; Sgrignoli B; Kim TI; Lee HK; Kim EK
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Oct; 28(10):714-24. PubMed ID: 23062002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of intraocular lens formulas using total keratometry in eyes with previous myopic laser refractive surgery.
    Yeo TK; Heng WJ; Pek D; Wong J; Fam HB
    Eye (Lond); 2021 Jun; 35(6):1705-1711. PubMed ID: 32868880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Refractive predictability using two optical biometers and refraction types for intraocular lens power calculation in cataract surgery.
    Cheng H; Li J; Cheng B; Wu M
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jul; 40(7):1849-1856. PubMed ID: 32297050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraocular lens power calculation using the IOLMaster and various formulas in eyes with long axial length.
    Wang JK; Hu CY; Chang SW
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 18242451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The accuracy of the trifocal IOL calculation using equivalent K-readings and total corneal power in different zones.
    Shukhaev SV; Pustozerov E; Boiko EV; Kirillova OV
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2024 Feb; 262(2):495-504. PubMed ID: 37650898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry readings after corneal refractive surgery.
    Tang Q; Hoffer KJ; Olson MD; Miller KM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1198-203. PubMed ID: 19545808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of predicted refraction with multifocal intraocular lenses using two biometry measurement devices and multiple intraocular lens power calculation formulas.
    Reitblat O; Assia EI; Kleinmann G; Levy A; Barrett GD; Abulafia A
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015; 43(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 25491591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Refractive Predictability Using the IOLMaster 700 and Artificial Intelligence-Based IOL Power Formulas Compared to Standard Formulas.
    Cheng H; Kane JX; Liu L; Li J; Cheng B; Wu M
    J Refract Surg; 2020 Jul; 36(7):466-472. PubMed ID: 32644169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of ocular biometric factors on the accuracy of various IOL power calculation formulas.
    Jeong J; Song H; Lee JK; Chuck RS; Kwon JW
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 May; 17(1):62. PubMed ID: 28464806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry readings after corneal refractive surgery in the absence of clinical history.
    Bialer OY; Kaiserman I; Bahar I
    Ophthalmic Res; 2014; 52(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 25402842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraocular lens power calculation using IOLMaster and various formulas in short eyes.
    Roh YR; Lee SM; Han YK; Kim MK; Wee WR; Lee JH
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2011 Jun; 25(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 21655038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods for Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Cataract Surgery after Radial Keratotomy.
    Turnbull AMJ; Crawford GJ; Barrett GD
    Ophthalmology; 2020 Jan; 127(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 31561878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Agreement in anterior segment measurements between swept-source and Scheimpflug-based optical biometries in keratoconic eyes: a pilot study.
    Chalkiadaki E; Gartaganis PS; Ntravalias T; Giannakis I; Manousakis E; Karmiris E
    Ther Adv Ophthalmol; 2022; 14():25158414211063283. PubMed ID: 35387236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraocular Lens Power Selection after Radial Keratotomy: Topography, Manual, and IOLMaster Keratometry Results Using Haigis Formulas.
    Geggel HS
    Ophthalmology; 2015 May; 122(5):897-902. PubMed ID: 25601534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving refractive outcomes at extreme axial lengths with the IOLMaster: the optical axial length and keratometric transformation.
    Fam HB; Lim KL
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):678-83. PubMed ID: 19168467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Accuracy in Keratometries Measured by Different Camera Devices for Predicting the Intraocular Lens Power in Lens-Dislocated Patients.
    Chen TH; Song LH; Liu Y; Zhao Y; Chen ZX; Jiang YX
    Ophthalmic Res; 2023; 66(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 35785758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.