174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33733888)
1. Outcome of Ti/PEEK Versus PEEK Cages in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Yao YC; Chou PH; Lin HH; Wang ST; Chang MC
Global Spine J; 2023 Mar; 13(2):472-478. PubMed ID: 33733888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative Analysis of Radiologic Outcomes Between Polyetheretherketone and Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Cages After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Sultana T; Hossain M; Jeong JH; Im S
World Neurosurg; 2023 Nov; 179():e241-e255. PubMed ID: 37611804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparison of Polyetheretherketone and Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Singhatanadgige W; Tangchitcharoen N; Kerr SJ; Tanasansomboon T; Yingsakmongkol W; Kotheeranurak V; Limthongkul W
World Neurosurg; 2022 Dec; 168():e471-e479. PubMed ID: 36216250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reduced Subsidence With PEEK-Titanium Composite Versus 3D Titanium Cages in a Retrospective, Self-Controlled Study in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Chahlavi A
Global Spine J; 2024 May; ():21925682241253168. PubMed ID: 38780086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgical Treatment for Posterior Migration of Polyetheretherketone Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage: Case Series.
Telfeian AE; Oyelese A; Fridley J; Gokaslan ZL
World Neurosurg; 2021 Mar; 147():e437-e443. PubMed ID: 33359521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes between the n-HA/PA66 Cage and the PEEK Cage Used in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Matched-Pair Case Control Study.
Zhang Z; Hu BW; Wang L; Yang HL; Li T; Liu LM; Yang X; Song YM
Orthop Surg; 2023 Jan; 15(1):152-161. PubMed ID: 36398388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium and PEEK Cages for Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial.
Deng Z; Zou Q; Wang L; Wang L; Xiu P; Feng G; Song Y; Yang X
Orthop Surg; 2023 Nov; 15(11):2889-2900. PubMed ID: 37771127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Promotion of higher rates of early fusion using activated titanium versus polyetheretherketone cages in adults undergoing 1- and 2-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures: a randomized controlled trial.
Toop N; Dhaliwal J; Gifford CS; Gibbs D; Keister A; Miracle S; Forghani R; Grossbach AJ; Farhadi HF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Nov; 39(5):709-718. PubMed ID: 37542447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Titanium interlayer-mediated hydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
Zhu C; He M; Mao L; Yang H; Hu B; Zhang L; Feng G; Liu L; Song Y
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Nov; 22(1):918. PubMed ID: 34724952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Long-term Follow-Up of n-HA PA66 Cage and PEEK Cage of Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multi-level Degenerative Lumbar Diseases: A Stepwise Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Li Q; Gao Q; Wang L; Liu L; Yang H; Song Y
Orthop Surg; 2024 Jan; 16(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 37953456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk factors for polyetheretherketone cage subsidence following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Singhatanadgige W; Sukthuayat A; Tanaviriyachai T; Kongtharvonskul J; Tanasansomboon T; Kerr SJ; Limthongkul W
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2021 Sep; 163(9):2557-2565. PubMed ID: 34297205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of polyetheretherketone cages with femoral cortical bone allograft as a single-piece interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Cutler AR; Siddiqui S; Mohan AL; Hillard VH; Cerabona F; Das K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Dec; 5(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 17176018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation.
Nemoto O; Asazuma T; Yato Y; Imabayashi H; Yasuoka H; Fujikawa A
Eur Spine J; 2014 Oct; 23(10):2150-5. PubMed ID: 25015180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature.
Massaad E; Fatima N; Kiapour A; Hadzipasic M; Shankar GM; Shin JH
Neurospine; 2020 Mar; 17(1):125-135. PubMed ID: 32252163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Titanium‑coated polyetheretherketone cages vs. polyetheretherketone cages in lumbar interbody fusion: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.
Li S; Li X; Bai X; Wang Y; Han P; Li H
Exp Ther Med; 2023 Jun; 25(6):305. PubMed ID: 37229321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized Controlled Trial of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Ti- and CaP-Nanocoated Polyetheretherketone Cages: Comparative Study of the 1-Year Radiological and Clinical Outcome.
Willems K; Lauweryns P; Verleye G; VAN Goethem J
Int J Spine Surg; 2019 Dec; 13(6):575-587. PubMed ID: 31970054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison Between 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium and Polyetheretherketone Cages: 1-Year Outcome After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.
Kim DY; Kwon OH; Park JY
Neurospine; 2022 Sep; 19(3):524-532. PubMed ID: 36203279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk Factors of Cage Subsidence in Patients Received Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Yao YC; Chou PH; Lin HH; Wang ST; Liu CL; Chang MC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Oct; 45(19):E1279-E1285. PubMed ID: 32472823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]