BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33733888)

  • 1. Outcome of Ti/PEEK Versus PEEK Cages in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Yao YC; Chou PH; Lin HH; Wang ST; Chang MC
    Global Spine J; 2023 Mar; 13(2):472-478. PubMed ID: 33733888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative Analysis of Radiologic Outcomes Between Polyetheretherketone and Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Cages After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Sultana T; Hossain M; Jeong JH; Im S
    World Neurosurg; 2023 Nov; 179():e241-e255. PubMed ID: 37611804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparison of Polyetheretherketone and Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Singhatanadgige W; Tangchitcharoen N; Kerr SJ; Tanasansomboon T; Yingsakmongkol W; Kotheeranurak V; Limthongkul W
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Dec; 168():e471-e479. PubMed ID: 36216250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduced Subsidence With PEEK-Titanium Composite Versus 3D Titanium Cages in a Retrospective, Self-Controlled Study in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Chahlavi A
    Global Spine J; 2024 May; ():21925682241253168. PubMed ID: 38780086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgical Treatment for Posterior Migration of Polyetheretherketone Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage: Case Series.
    Telfeian AE; Oyelese A; Fridley J; Gokaslan ZL
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Mar; 147():e437-e443. PubMed ID: 33359521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes between the n-HA/PA66 Cage and the PEEK Cage Used in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Matched-Pair Case Control Study.
    Zhang Z; Hu BW; Wang L; Yang HL; Li T; Liu LM; Yang X; Song YM
    Orthop Surg; 2023 Jan; 15(1):152-161. PubMed ID: 36398388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium and PEEK Cages for Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial.
    Deng Z; Zou Q; Wang L; Wang L; Xiu P; Feng G; Song Y; Yang X
    Orthop Surg; 2023 Nov; 15(11):2889-2900. PubMed ID: 37771127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Promotion of higher rates of early fusion using activated titanium versus polyetheretherketone cages in adults undergoing 1- and 2-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures: a randomized controlled trial.
    Toop N; Dhaliwal J; Gifford CS; Gibbs D; Keister A; Miracle S; Forghani R; Grossbach AJ; Farhadi HF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Nov; 39(5):709-718. PubMed ID: 37542447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Titanium interlayer-mediated hydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
    Zhu C; He M; Mao L; Yang H; Hu B; Zhang L; Feng G; Liu L; Song Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Nov; 22(1):918. PubMed ID: 34724952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Long-term Follow-Up of n-HA PA66 Cage and PEEK Cage of Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multi-level Degenerative Lumbar Diseases: A Stepwise Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
    Li Q; Gao Q; Wang L; Liu L; Yang H; Song Y
    Orthop Surg; 2024 Jan; 16(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 37953456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk factors for polyetheretherketone cage subsidence following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Singhatanadgige W; Sukthuayat A; Tanaviriyachai T; Kongtharvonskul J; Tanasansomboon T; Kerr SJ; Limthongkul W
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2021 Sep; 163(9):2557-2565. PubMed ID: 34297205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of polyetheretherketone cages with femoral cortical bone allograft as a single-piece interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Cutler AR; Siddiqui S; Mohan AL; Hillard VH; Cerabona F; Das K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Dec; 5(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 17176018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation.
    Nemoto O; Asazuma T; Yato Y; Imabayashi H; Yasuoka H; Fujikawa A
    Eur Spine J; 2014 Oct; 23(10):2150-5. PubMed ID: 25015180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature.
    Massaad E; Fatima N; Kiapour A; Hadzipasic M; Shankar GM; Shin JH
    Neurospine; 2020 Mar; 17(1):125-135. PubMed ID: 32252163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Titanium‑coated polyetheretherketone cages vs. polyetheretherketone cages in lumbar interbody fusion: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.
    Li S; Li X; Bai X; Wang Y; Han P; Li H
    Exp Ther Med; 2023 Jun; 25(6):305. PubMed ID: 37229321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized Controlled Trial of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Ti- and CaP-Nanocoated Polyetheretherketone Cages: Comparative Study of the 1-Year Radiological and Clinical Outcome.
    Willems K; Lauweryns P; Verleye G; VAN Goethem J
    Int J Spine Surg; 2019 Dec; 13(6):575-587. PubMed ID: 31970054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison Between 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium and Polyetheretherketone Cages: 1-Year Outcome After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.
    Kim DY; Kwon OH; Park JY
    Neurospine; 2022 Sep; 19(3):524-532. PubMed ID: 36203279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
    Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk Factors of Cage Subsidence in Patients Received Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Yao YC; Chou PH; Lin HH; Wang ST; Liu CL; Chang MC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Oct; 45(19):E1279-E1285. PubMed ID: 32472823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.