224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33734466)
1. Machine learning prediction models in orthopedic surgery: A systematic review in transparent reporting.
Groot OQ; Ogink PT; Lans A; Twining PK; Kapoor ND; DiGiovanni W; Bindels BJJ; Bongers MER; Oosterhoff JHF; Karhade AV; Oner FC; Verlaan JJ; Schwab JH
J Orthop Res; 2022 Feb; 40(2):475-483. PubMed ID: 33734466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality assessment of machine learning models for diagnostic imaging in orthopaedics: A systematic review.
Lans A; Pierik RJB; Bales JR; Fourman MS; Shin D; Kanbier LN; Rifkin J; DiGiovanni WH; Chopra RR; Moeinzad R; Verlaan JJ; Schwab JH
Artif Intell Med; 2022 Oct; 132():102396. PubMed ID: 36207080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Availability and reporting quality of external validations of machine-learning prediction models with orthopedic surgical outcomes: a systematic review.
Groot OQ; Bindels BJJ; Ogink PT; Kapoor ND; Twining PK; Collins AK; Bongers MER; Lans A; Oosterhoff JHF; Karhade AV; Verlaan JJ; Schwab JH
Acta Orthop; 2021 Aug; 92(4):385-393. PubMed ID: 33870837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting and risk of bias of prediction models based on machine learning methods in preterm birth: A systematic review.
Yang Q; Fan X; Cao X; Hao W; Lu J; Wei J; Tian J; Yin M; Ge L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Jan; 102(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 36397723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic review of machine-learning models in orthopaedic trauma.
Dijkstra H; van de Kuit A; de Groot T; Canta O; Groot OQ; Oosterhoff JH; Doornberg JN; ; ; van den Bekerom M; Calderon SL; Colaris J; Duis KT; Esfahani SA; DiGiovanni C; Gordon M; Guss D; IJpma F; Jaarsma R; Janssen M; Jayakumar P; Kerkhoffs GM; Leighton R; van Munster B; Poolman R; Ring D; Schemtisch E; Stirler V; Tornetta P; Wijffels M
Bone Jt Open; 2024 Jan; 5(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 38226447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence.
Collins GS; Dhiman P; Andaur Navarro CL; Ma J; Hooft L; Reitsma JB; Logullo P; Beam AL; Peng L; Van Calster B; van Smeden M; Riley RD; Moons KG
BMJ Open; 2021 Jul; 11(7):e048008. PubMed ID: 34244270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques.
Andaur Navarro CL; Damen JAAG; Takada T; Nijman SWJ; Dhiman P; Ma J; Collins GS; Bajpai R; Riley RD; Moons KG; Hooft L
BMJ Open; 2020 Nov; 10(11):e038832. PubMed ID: 33177137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review.
Andaur Navarro CL; Damen JAA; Takada T; Nijman SWJ; Dhiman P; Ma J; Collins GS; Bajpai R; Riley RD; Moons KGM; Hooft L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jan; 22(1):12. PubMed ID: 35026997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review.
Dhiman P; Ma J; Andaur Navarro CL; Speich B; Bullock G; Damen JAA; Hooft L; Kirtley S; Riley RD; Van Calster B; Moons KGM; Collins GS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):101. PubMed ID: 35395724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Current state and completeness of reporting clinical prediction models using machine learning in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review.
Munguía-Realpozo P; Etchegaray-Morales I; Mendoza-Pinto C; Méndez-Martínez S; Osorio-Peña ÁD; Ayón-Aguilar J; García-Carrasco M
Autoimmun Rev; 2023 May; 22(5):103294. PubMed ID: 36791873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved.
Dhiman P; Ma J; Navarro CA; Speich B; Bullock G; Damen JA; Kirtley S; Hooft L; Riley RD; Van Calster B; Moons KGM; Collins GS
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():60-72. PubMed ID: 34214626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Machine Learning in Differentiating Gliomas from Primary CNS Lymphomas: A Systematic Review, Reporting Quality, and Risk of Bias Assessment.
Cassinelli Petersen GI; Shatalov J; Verma T; Brim WR; Subramanian H; Brackett A; Bahar RC; Merkaj S; Zeevi T; Staib LH; Cui J; Omuro A; Bronen RA; Malhotra A; Aboian MS
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2022 Apr; 43(4):526-533. PubMed ID: 35361577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wide range of applications for machine-learning prediction models in orthopedic surgical outcome: a systematic review.
Ogink PT; Groot OQ; Karhade AV; Bongers MER; Oner FC; Verlaan JJ; Schwab JH
Acta Orthop; 2021 Oct; 92(5):526-531. PubMed ID: 34109892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement.
Collins GS; Reitsma JB; Altman DG; Moons KGM;
Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1142-1151. PubMed ID: 25572824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multivariable prediction models for health care spending using machine learning: a protocol of a systematic review.
Huang AW; Haslberger M; Coulibaly N; Galárraga O; Oganisian A; Belbasis L; Panagiotou OA
Diagn Progn Res; 2022 Mar; 6(1):4. PubMed ID: 35321760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of radiomics for predicting microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review.
Yuan E; Chen Y; Song B
Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3467-3477. PubMed ID: 36749371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Machine learning predictive models in neurosurgery: an appraisal based on the TRIPOD guidelines. Systematic review.
Warman A; Kalluri AL; Azad TD
Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jun; 54(6):E8. PubMed ID: 37283325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction models in gynaecology: Transparent reporting needed for clinical application.
Gelderblom ME; Stevens KYR; Houterman S; Weyers S; Schoot BC
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Oct; 265():190-202. PubMed ID: 34509878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Examining Bias and Reporting in Oral Health Prediction Modeling Studies.
Du M; Haag D; Song Y; Lynch J; Mittinty M
J Dent Res; 2020 Apr; 99(4):374-387. PubMed ID: 32028825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review.
Andaur Navarro CL; Damen JAA; Takada T; Nijman SWJ; Dhiman P; Ma J; Collins GS; Bajpai R; Riley RD; Moons KGM; Hooft L
BMJ; 2021 Oct; 375():n2281. PubMed ID: 34670780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
