181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33734488)
41. CA19-9 as the most significant prognostic indicator of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Wang WS; Lin JK; Chiou TJ; Liu JH; Fan FS; Yen CC; Lin TC; Jiang JK; Yang SH; Wang HS; Chen PM
Hepatogastroenterology; 2002; 49(43):160-4. PubMed ID: 11941943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Evaluation of preoperative prognostic factors in patients with resectable invasive intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma.
Izumo W; Higuchi R; Furukawa T; Yazawa T; Uemura S; Shiihara M; Yamamoto M
Surgery; 2020 Dec; 168(6):994-1002. PubMed ID: 32139141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio is a Better Prognostic Serum Biomarker than Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients Undergoing Resection for Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Choi WJ; Cleghorn MC; Jiang H; Jackson TD; Okrainec A; Quereshy FA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S603-13. PubMed ID: 25900206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. NARFIB: A Novel Prognostic Score Based on the Neutrophil-to-Albumin Ratio and Fibrinogen Can Predict the Prognosis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.
Li R; Sun Z; Song S; He X; Shi X; Li Z; Song J
Cancer Manag Res; 2020; 12():11183-11190. PubMed ID: 33177869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Naples Prognostic Score Is a Useful Prognostic Marker in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Miyamoto Y; Hiyoshi Y; Daitoku N; Okadome K; Sakamoto Y; Yamashita K; Kuroda D; Sawayama H; Iwatsuki M; Baba Y; Yoshida N; Baba H
Dis Colon Rectum; 2019 Dec; 62(12):1485-1493. PubMed ID: 31567920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Preoperative plasma fibrinogen, but not D-dimer might represent a prognostic factor in non-metastatic colorectal cancer: A prospective cohort study.
Hong T; Shen D; Chen X; Wu X; Hua D
Cancer Biomark; 2017; 19(1):103-111. PubMed ID: 28269756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluation of cumulative prognostic score based on pretreatment plasma fibrinogen and serum albumin levels in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas.
He ZQ; Duan H; Ke C; Zhang XH; Guo CC; Al-Nahari F; Zhang J; Chen ZH; Chen YS; Liu ZG; Wang J; Chen ZP; Jiang XB; Mou YG
Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(30):49605-49614. PubMed ID: 28548947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Prognostic significance of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in patients with gallbladder carcinoma.
Liu F; Hu HJ; Ma WJ; Yang Q; Wang JK; Li FY
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Feb; 98(8):e14550. PubMed ID: 30813165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Significance of serum concentrations of E-selectin and CA19-9 in the prognosis of colorectal cancer.
Sato H; Usuda N; Kuroda M; Hashimoto S; Maruta M; Maeda K
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2010 Nov; 40(11):1073-80. PubMed ID: 20576794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Usefulness of Preoperative Plasma Fibrinogen Versus Other Prognostic Markers for Predicting Gastric Cancer Recurrence.
Yamamoto M; Kurokawa Y; Miyazaki Y; Makino T; Takahashi T; Yamasaki M; Nakajima K; Takiguchi S; Mori M; Doki Y
World J Surg; 2016 Aug; 40(8):1904-9. PubMed ID: 26969673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Research Progress of Preoperative FPR, FAR or AFR in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.
Chen C; Liu Y; Han P; Cui B
Cancer Manag Res; 2021; 13():1791-1801. PubMed ID: 33654428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The prognostic value of preoperative inflammation-based prognostic scores and nutritional status for overall survival in resected patients with nonmetastatic Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction.
Zhang L; Su Y; Chen Z; Wei Z; Han W; Xu A
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jul; 96(30):e7647. PubMed ID: 28746229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Mucinous and Signet Ring Cell Differentiation Affect Patterns of Metastasis in Colorectal Carcinoma and Influence Survival.
Kermanshahi TR; Magge D; Choudry H; Ramalingam L; Zhu B; Pingpank J; Ahrendt S; Holtzman M; Zeh H; Bartlett D; Zureikat A; Pai RK
Int J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 25(2):108-117. PubMed ID: 27571790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Prognostic Value of Hematologic Prealbumin/Fibrinogen Ratio in Patients with Glioma.
Hou S; Jin C; Yang M; Chu H; Shi B; Xie R; Chen Y; Lin N
World Neurosurg; 2022 Apr; 160():e442-e453. PubMed ID: 35051638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Post-chemotherapeutic CEA and CA19-9 are prognostic factors in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with hepatic resection after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.
Sakamoto Y; Miyamoto Y; Beppu T; Nitta H; Imai K; Hayashi H; Baba Y; Yoshida N; Chikamoto A; Baba H
Anticancer Res; 2015 Apr; 35(4):2359-68. PubMed ID: 25862901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is a superior indicator of prognosis compared with other inflammatory biomarkers in resectable colorectal cancer.
Song Y; Yang Y; Gao P; Chen X; Yu D; Xu Y; Zhao J; Wang Z
BMC Cancer; 2017 Nov; 17(1):744. PubMed ID: 29126400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Prognosis and value of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III mucinous colorectal carcinoma.
Hugen N; Verhoeven RH; Radema SA; de Hingh IH; Pruijt JF; Nagtegaal ID; Lemmens VE; de Wilt JH
Ann Oncol; 2013 Nov; 24(11):2819-24. PubMed ID: 24057984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Fibrinogen-Albumin Ratio Index (FARI): A More Promising Inflammation-Based Prognostic Marker for Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases.
Wang YY; Liu ZZ; Xu D; Liu M; Wang K; Xing BC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(11):3682-3692. PubMed ID: 31264117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Impact of cytoreductive surgery on outcomes of metastatic appendiceal carcinoma: a real-world, population-based study.
Abdel-Rahman O
J Comp Eff Res; 2020 Apr; 9(6):431-439. PubMed ID: 32253936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Prognostic value of a novel FPR biomarker in patients with surgical stage II and III gastric cancer.
Zhang J; Li SQ; Liao ZH; Jiang YH; Chen QG; Huang B; Liu J; Xu YM; Lin J; Ying HQ; Wang XZ
Oncotarget; 2017 Sep; 8(43):75195-75205. PubMed ID: 29088857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
