These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33734748)

  • 1. The paradox of conviction probability: Mock defendants want better deals as risk of conviction increases.
    Bartlett JM; Zottoli TM
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Feb; 45(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 33734748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From whose perspective? Differences between actors and observers in determining the voluntariness of guilty pleas.
    Fessinger MB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Oct; 46(5):353-371. PubMed ID: 36227320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Homelessness and pretrial detention predict unfavorable outcomes in the plea bargaining process.
    Davis RW
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Jun; 46(3):201-213. PubMed ID: 35604706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The trial tax and the intersection of race/ethnicity, gender, and age in criminal court sentencing.
    Lehmann PS
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):201-216. PubMed ID: 36931858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The psychology of defendant plea decision making.
    Redlich AD; Bibas S; Edkins VA; Madon S
    Am Psychol; 2017; 72(4):339-352. PubMed ID: 28481581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. COVID-19 exacerbates existing system factors that disadvantage defendants: Findings from a national survey of defense attorneys.
    Daftary-Kapur T; Henderson KS; Zottoli TM
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):81-96. PubMed ID: 34110871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Plea bargaining recommendations by criminal defense attorneys: evidence strength, potential sentence, and defendant preference.
    Kramer GM; Wolbransky M; Heilbrun K
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):573-85. PubMed ID: 17486632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Content and comprehensibility of juvenile and adult tender-of-plea forms: implications for knowing, intelligent, and voluntary guilty pleas.
    Redlich AD; Bonventre CL
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Apr; 39(2):162-76. PubMed ID: 25528381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Innocence in the shadow of COVID-19: Plea decision making during a pandemic.
    Wilford MM; Zimmerman DM; Yan S; Sutherland KT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Dec; 27(4):739-750. PubMed ID: 34138621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does evidence really matter? An exploratory analysis of the role of evidence in plea bargaining in felony drug cases.
    Kutateladze BL; Lawson VZ; Andiloro NR
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Oct; 39(5):431-42. PubMed ID: 26052630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guilty plea hearings in juvenile and criminal court.
    Redlich AD; Domagalski K; Woestehoff SA; Dezember A; Quas JA
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Oct; 46(5):337-352. PubMed ID: 36227319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Negotiating with parents: Attorney practices in the juvenile plea bargain process.
    Fountain EN; Woolard J
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):112-123. PubMed ID: 34110873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptions of plea bargaining in cases of elder financial abuse.
    Riederer AM; Golding JM
    J Elder Abuse Negl; 2020 Jun; 32(3):217-234. PubMed ID: 32160818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Guilty pleas of youths and adults: Differences in legal knowledge and decision making.
    Zottoli TM; Daftary-Kapur T
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Apr; 43(2):166-179. PubMed ID: 30570279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rate of false conviction of criminal defendants who are sentenced to death.
    Gross SR; O'Brien B; Hu C; Kennedy EH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 May; 111(20):7230-5. PubMed ID: 24778209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of pretrial publicity on male and female jurors and judges in a mock rape trial.
    Riedel RG
    Psychol Rep; 1993 Dec; 73(3 Pt 1):819-32. PubMed ID: 8302986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Defense attorney plea recommendations and client race: does zealous representation apply equally to all?
    Edkins VA
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Oct; 35(5):413-25. PubMed ID: 21103915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Insanity defense pleas in Baltimore City: an analysis of outcome.
    Janofsky JS; Dunn MH; Roskes EJ; Briskin JK; Rudolph MS
    Am J Psychiatry; 1996 Nov; 153(11):1464-8. PubMed ID: 8890682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Limitations on the Ability to Negotiate Justice: Attorney Perspectives on Guilt, Innocence, and Legal Advice in the Current Plea System.
    Helm RK; Reyna VF; Franz AA; Novick RZ; Dincin S; Cort AE
    Psychol Crime Law; 2018; 24(9):915-934. PubMed ID: 30745792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Male Defendants' Attractiveness and Trustworthiness on Simulated Judicial Decisions in Two Different Swindles.
    Yang Q; Zhu B; Zhang Q; Wang Y; Hu R; Liu S; Sun D
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2160. PubMed ID: 31616349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.