164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33734771)
1. Can you trust what you hear? Concurrent misinformation affects recall memory and judgments of guilt.
Neil GJ; Higham PA; Fox S
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Sep; 150(9):1741-1759. PubMed ID: 33734771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The quality of false memory over time: is memory for misinformation "remembered" or "known"?
Frost P
Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 11082861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of postwarning specificity on memory performance and confidence in the eyewitness misinformation paradigm.
Higham PA; Blank H; Luna K
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Dec; 23(4):417-432. PubMed ID: 28816470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Individual differences in susceptibility to misinformation effects and hindsight bias.
Calvillo DP
J Gen Psychol; 2014; 141(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 25302589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The medium and the message: Comparing the effectiveness of six methods of misinformation delivery in an eyewitness memory paradigm.
Greene CM; Bradshaw R; Huston C; Murphy G
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2022 Dec; 28(4):677-693. PubMed ID: 34110859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sound and credibility in the virtual court: Low audio quality leads to less favorable evaluations of witnesses and lower weighting of evidence.
Bild E; Redman A; Newman EJ; Muir BR; Tait D; Schwarz N
Law Hum Behav; 2021 Oct; 45(5):481-495. PubMed ID: 34871019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Eyewitness confidence malleability: Misinformation as post-identification feedback.
Greenspan RL; Loftus EF
Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 44(3):194-208. PubMed ID: 32378911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Are witnesses able to avoid highly accessible misinformation? Examining the efficacy of different warnings for high and low accessibility postevent misinformation.
Bulevich JB; Gordon LT; Hughes GI; Thomas AK
Mem Cognit; 2022 Jan; 50(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 34997479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics.
Echterhoff G; Hirst W; Hussy W
Mem Cognit; 2005 Jul; 33(5):770-82. PubMed ID: 16383166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Misinformation does not reduce trust in accurate search results, but warning banners may backfire.
Williams-Ceci S; Macy MW; Naaman M
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):10977. PubMed ID: 38744967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrieval enhances eyewitness suggestibility to misinformation in free and cued recall.
Wilford MM; Chan JC; Tuhn SJ
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Mar; 20(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 24000960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correcting statistical misinformation about scientific findings in the media: Causation versus correlation.
Irving D; Clark RWA; Lewandowsky S; Allen PJ
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2022 Mar; 28(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 35007097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of age on remembering and knowing misinformation.
Saunders J; Jess A
Memory; 2010 Jan; 18(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 20013464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reminders of Everyday Misinformation Statements Can Enhance Memory for and Beliefs in Corrections of Those Statements in the Short Term.
Wahlheim CN; Alexander TR; Peske CD
Psychol Sci; 2020 Oct; 31(10):1325-1339. PubMed ID: 32976064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Warning weakens retrieval-enhanced suggestibility only when it is given shortly after misinformation: The critical importance of timing.
Chan JCK; O'Donnell R; Manley KD
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2022 Dec; 28(4):694-716. PubMed ID: 34990152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of associative inference on individuals' susceptibility to misinformation.
Xiong A; Lee S; Seo H; Lee D
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2023 Mar; 29(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 35175090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age differences in eyewitness memory for a realistic event.
West RL; Stone KR
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2014 May; 69(3):338-47. PubMed ID: 23531920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When Misinformation Improves Memory.
Putnam AL; Sungkhasettee VW; Roediger HL
Psychol Sci; 2017 Jan; 28(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 27879321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Explaining the forgetting bias effect on value judgments: The influence of memory for a past test.
Rhodes MG; Witherby AE; Castel AD; Murayama K
Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):362-374. PubMed ID: 27873187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The continued influence of implied and explicitly stated misinformation in news reports.
Rich PR; Zaragoza MS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 26147670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
