These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33735379)

  • 1. Cephalometry without complex dedicated postprocessing in an oriented magnetic resonance imaging dataset: a pilot study.
    März K; Chepura T; Plewig B; Haddad D; Weber D; Schmid M; Hirschfelder U; Gölz L
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Dec; 43(6):614-621. PubMed ID: 33735379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo comparison of MRI- and CBCT-based 3D cephalometric analysis: beginning of a non-ionizing diagnostic era in craniomaxillofacial imaging?
    Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Weber D; Jende JME; Saleem MA; Zingler S; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 31802215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lateral cephalometric analysis for treatment planning in orthodontics based on MRI compared with radiographs: A feasibility study in children and adolescents.
    Heil A; Lazo Gonzalez E; Hilgenfeld T; Kickingereder P; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Ozga AK; Sommer A; Lux CJ; Zingler S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174524. PubMed ID: 28334054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cephalometric measurements performed on CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalograms: a cross-sectional study providing a quantitative approach of differences and bias.
    Baldini B; Cavagnetto D; Baselli G; Sforza C; Tartaglia GM
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Mar; 22(1):98. PubMed ID: 35351080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a tridimensional cephalometric analysis performed on 3T-MRI compared with CBCT: a pilot study in adults.
    Maspero C; Abate A; Bellincioni F; Cavagnetto D; Lanteri V; Costa A; Farronato M
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Oct; 20(1):40. PubMed ID: 31631241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo reliability of 3D cephalometric landmark determination on magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.
    Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Zingler S; Saleem MA; Jende JME; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1339-1349. PubMed ID: 31352517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adding Depth to Cephalometric Analysis: Comparing Two- and Three-Dimensional Angular Cephalometric Measurements.
    Jodeh DS; Kuykendall LV; Ford JM; Ruso S; Decker SJ; Rottgers SA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 30(5):1568-1571. PubMed ID: 31299770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
    Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility.
    Juerchott A; Saleem MA; Hilgenfeld T; Freudlsperger C; Zingler S; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):13029. PubMed ID: 30158656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Black Bone" MRI: a potential non-ionizing method for three-dimensional cephalometric analysis--a preliminary feasibility study.
    Eley KA; Watt-Smith SR; Golding SJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130236. PubMed ID: 24052254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.
    Oz U; Orhan K; Abe N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(8):492-500. PubMed ID: 22065798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
    Kumar V; Ludlow JB; Mol A; Cevidanes L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 17586852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultra short time to Echo (UTE) MRI for cephalometric analysis-Potential of an x-ray free fast cephalometric projection technique.
    Abkai C; Hourfar J; Glockengießer J; Ulrici J; Hell E; Rasche V; Ludwig B
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257224. PubMed ID: 34516568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modern 3D cephalometry in pediatric orthodontics-downsizing the FOV and development of a new 3D cephalometric analysis within a minimized large FOV for dose reduction.
    Kissel P; Mah JK; Bumann A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jul; 25(7):4651-4670. PubMed ID: 33492515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Maal T; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of two-dimensional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements.
    Nalçaci R; Oztürk F; Sökücü O
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Feb; 39(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 20100922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study between data obtained from conventional lateral cephalometry and reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography images.
    Oh S; Kim CY; Hong J
    J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 40(3):123-9. PubMed ID: 25045639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new methodology for automatic detection of reference points in 3D cephalometry: A pilot study.
    Ed-Dhahraouy M; Riri H; Ezzahmouly M; Bourzgui F; El Moutaoukkil A
    Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):328-337. PubMed ID: 29628421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.