205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33735491)
1. Validation of a secondary dose check tool against Monte Carlo and analytical clinical dose calculation algorithms in VMAT.
Piffer S; Casati M; Marrazzo L; Arilli C; Calusi S; Desideri I; Fusi F; Pallotta S; Talamonti C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Apr; 22(4):52-62. PubMed ID: 33735491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of 4-Hz log files and secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation as patient-specific quality assurance for VMAT prostate plans.
Szeverinski P; Kowatsch M; Künzler T; Meinschad M; Clemens P; DeVries AF
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 22(7):235-244. PubMed ID: 34151502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement comparison and Monte Carlo analysis for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery verification using the ArcCHECK dosimetry system.
Lin MH; Koren S; Veltchev I; Li J; Wang L; Price RA; Ma CM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(2):3929. PubMed ID: 23470927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility of a GATE Monte Carlo platform in a clinical pretreatment QA system for VMAT treatment plans using TrueBeam with an HD120 multileaf collimator.
Lee B; Jeong S; Chung K; Yoon M; Park HC; Han Y; Jung SH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):101-110. PubMed ID: 31544350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Commissioning and clinical implementation of the first commercial independent Monte Carlo 3D dose calculation to replace CyberKnife M6™ patient-specific QA measurements.
Milder MTW; Alber M; Söhn M; Hoogeman MS
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 21(11):304-311. PubMed ID: 33103343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative evaluation of 3D dosimetry for stereotactic volumetric-modulated arc delivery using COMPASS.
Vikraman S; Manigandan D; Karrthick KP; Sambasivaselli R; Senniandavar V; Ramu M; Rajesh T; Lutz M; Muthukumaran M; Karthikeyan N; Tejinder K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 16(1):5128. PubMed ID: 25679152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Independent absorbed-dose calculation using the Monte Carlo algorithm in volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Haga A; Magome T; Takenaka S; Imae T; Sakumi A; Nomoto A; Igaki H; Shiraishi K; Yamashita H; Ohtomo K; Nakagawa K
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Mar; 9():75. PubMed ID: 24625221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Monte Carlo tool for evaluating VMAT and DIMRT treatment deliveries including planar detectors.
Asuni G; van Beek TA; Venkataraman S; Popescu IA; McCurdy BM
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(11):3535-50. PubMed ID: 23640066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A noise correction of the γ-index method for Monte Carlo dose distribution comparison.
Cohilis M; Sterpin E; Lee JA; Souris K
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):681-692. PubMed ID: 31660623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo simulations to replace film dosimetry in IMRT verification.
Goetzfried T; Rickhey M; Treutwein M; Koelbl O; Bogner L
Z Med Phys; 2011; 21(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 20888202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Independent Monte Carlo dose calculation identifies single isocenter multi-target radiosurgery targets most likely to fail pre-treatment measurement.
Erickson B; Cui Y; Alber M; Wang C; Fang Yin F; Kirkpatrick J; Adamson J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Jun; 25(6):e14290. PubMed ID: 38289874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The commissioning and validation of Monaco treatment planning system on an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator.
Snyder JE; Hyer DE; Flynn RT; Boczkowski A; Wang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):184-193. PubMed ID: 30525308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of independent dose calculation followed by machine log file analysis against conventional measurement based IMRT QA.
Sun B; Rangaraj D; Boddu S; Goddu M; Yang D; Palaniswaamy G; Yaddanapudi S; Wooten O; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 13(5):3837. PubMed ID: 22955649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. External beam patient dose verification based on the integral quality monitor (IQM
Mahuvava C; Du Plessis FCP
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Mar; 6(3):035014. PubMed ID: 33438659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric validation of Monaco treatment planning system on an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator.
Narayanasamy G; Saenz DL; Defoor D; Papanikolaou N; Stathakis S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):123-129. PubMed ID: 28944979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated Monte-Carlo re-calculation of proton therapy plans using Geant4/Gate: implementation and comparison to plan-specific quality assurance measurements.
Aitkenhead AH; Sitch P; Richardson JC; Winterhalter C; Patel I; Mackay RI
Br J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 93(1114):20200228. PubMed ID: 32726141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of 3-dimensional dose reconstruction system between fluence-based system and dose measurement-guided system.
Nakaguchi Y; Ono T; Onitsuka R; Maruyama M; Shimohigashi Y; Kai Y
Med Dosim; 2016; 41(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 27179708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
