BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33736333)

  • 21. Managing aquifer recharge with multi-source water to realize sustainable management of groundwater resources in Jinan, China.
    Zhang Z; Wang W
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Mar; 28(9):10872-10888. PubMed ID: 33106904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rooftop water harvesting for managed aquifer recharge and flood mitigation in tropical cities: Towards a strategy of co-benefit evaluations in João Pessoa, northeast Brazil.
    Baptista VSG; Coelho VHR; Bertrand GF; da Silva GBL; Caicedo NOL; Montenegro SMGL; Stefan C; Glass J; Heim R; Conrad A; Almeida CDN
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Sep; 342():118034. PubMed ID: 37187070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimating Groundwater Mounding in Sloping Aquifers for Managed Aquifer Recharge.
    Zlotnik VA; Kacimov A; Al-Maktoumi A
    Ground Water; 2017 Nov; 55(6):797-810. PubMed ID: 28464226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of intake interruptions on dune infiltration systems in the Netherlands, their quantification and mitigation.
    Stuyfzand PJ; van der Schans ML
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jul; 630():757-773. PubMed ID: 29499534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Nutrient Removal during Stormwater Aquifer Storage and Recovery in an Anoxic Carbonate Aquifer.
    Vanderzalm JL; Page DW; Dillon PJ; Barry KE; Gonzalez D
    J Environ Qual; 2018 Mar; 47(1):276-286. PubMed ID: 29634793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Water Conservation with Managed Aquifer Recharge under Increased Drought Risk.
    Tran DQ; Kovacs K; Wallander S
    Environ Manage; 2020 Oct; 66(4):664-682. PubMed ID: 32712764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of Potential Risks Associated with Urban Stormwater Quality for Managed Aquifer Recharge.
    Song Y; Du X; Ye X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(17):. PubMed ID: 31461969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Characteristics and origin of clogging-functional bacteria during managed aquifer recharge: A laboratory study.
    Xia L; You H; Liu J; Wu W; Lin L
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jun; 312():114880. PubMed ID: 35305358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. PFAS release from the subsurface and capillary fringe during managed aquifer recharge.
    Das TK; Han Z; Banerjee S; Raoelison OD; Adeleye AS; Mohanty SK
    Environ Pollut; 2024 Feb; 343():123166. PubMed ID: 38110050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Planning for Managed Aquifer Recharge Projects.
    McCurry G; Pyne D
    Ground Water; 2022 Sep; 60(5):583-590. PubMed ID: 35811302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Selection and evaluation of water pretreatment technologies for managed aquifer recharge (MAR) with reclaimed water.
    Yuan J; Van Dyke MI; Huck PM
    Chemosphere; 2019 Dec; 236():124886. PubMed ID: 31564425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Characterization of organic precursors in DBP formation and AOC in urban surface water and their fate during managed aquifer recharge.
    Kim HC; Lee WM; Lee S; Choi J; Maeng SK
    Water Res; 2017 Oct; 123():75-85. PubMed ID: 28651083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Inferring trophic conditions in managed aquifer recharge systems from metagenomic data.
    Hellauer K; Michel P; Holland SI; Hübner U; Drewes JE; Lauro FM; Manefield MJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 772():145512. PubMed ID: 33571764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Challenges and Experiences of Managed Aquifer Recharge in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area.
    Palma Nava A; Parker TK; Carmona Paredes RB
    Ground Water; 2022 Sep; 60(5):675-684. PubMed ID: 35924418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A review on risk assessment in managed aquifer recharge.
    Imig A; Szabó Z; Halytsia O; Vrachioli M; Kleinert V; Rein A
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2022 Nov; 18(6):1513-1529. PubMed ID: 35075774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of pre-oxidation between O
    Kim HC; Park SH; Noh JH; Choi J; Lee S; Maeng SK
    J Hazard Mater; 2019 Sep; 377():290-298. PubMed ID: 31173978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of managed aquifer recharge structure on river flow regimes in arid and semi-arid climates.
    Yaraghi N; Ronkanen AK; Darabi H; Kløve B; Torabi Haghighi A
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jul; 675():429-438. PubMed ID: 31030149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Demonstration of Managed Aquifer Recharge in a Coastal Plain Aquifer: Lessons Learned.
    Martinez MB; Widdowson MA; Bott C; Holloway D; Heisig-Mitchell J; Wilson C
    Ground Water; 2022 Sep; 60(5):668-674. PubMed ID: 35302237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using electrical resistivity tomography to assess the effectiveness of managed aquifer recharge in a salinized coastal aquifer.
    García-Menéndez O; Ballesteros BJ; Renau-Pruñonosa A; Morell I; Mochales T; Ibarra PI; Rubio FM
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Jan; 190(2):100. PubMed ID: 29374329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A new workflow for assigning removal credits to assess overall performance of managed aquifer recharge (MAR).
    Zhiteneva V; Mosher J; Gerba CP; Rauch-Williams T; Drewes JE
    Water Res; 2023 May; 235():119836. PubMed ID: 36931188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.