These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33736524)

  • 1. Interpreting Adjuncts: Processing English
    Frazier L; Clifton C
    Lang Speech; 2022 Mar; 65(1):193-215. PubMed ID: 33736524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Negative clauses imply affirmative topics and affirmative antecedents.
    Clifton C; Frazier L; Kaup B
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2021 Dec; 50(6):1261-1282. PubMed ID: 34363177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Highs and Lows in English Attachment.
    Grillo N; Costa J; Fernandes B; Santi A
    Cognition; 2015 Nov; 144():116-22. PubMed ID: 26266518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effects of punctuation on the processing of syntactically ambiguous Japanese sentences with a semantic bias].
    Niikuni K; Muramoto T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2014 Jun; 85(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 25016842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prosodic boundaries, comma rules, and brain responses: the closure positive shift in ERPs as a universal marker for prosodic phrasing in listeners and readers.
    Steinhauer K; Friederici AD
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2001 May; 30(3):267-95. PubMed ID: 11523275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prosodic boundaries delay the processing of upcoming lexical information during silent sentence reading.
    Luo Y; Yan M; Zhou X
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):915-30. PubMed ID: 22774853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Context Breeds False Memories for Indeterminate Sentences.
    Riven L; de Almeida RG
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():616065. PubMed ID: 33776841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: evidence from self-paced reading.
    Swets B; Desmet T; Clifton C; Ferreira F
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jan; 36(1):201-16. PubMed ID: 18323075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Wonnacott E; Joseph HS; Adelman JS; Nation K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):855-79. PubMed ID: 25774745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: an analysis with event-related potentials.
    Mecklinger A; Schriefers H; Steinhauer K; Friederici AD
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jul; 23(4):477-94. PubMed ID: 7666761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The on-line resolution of the sentence complement/relative clause ambiguity: evidence from Spanish.
    Demestre J; García-Albea JE
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 14959507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative clause interpretation preferences in Spanish and English.
    Carreiras M; Clifton C
    Lang Speech; 1993; 36 ( Pt 4)():353-72. PubMed ID: 8072346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sentence processing in the visual and auditory modality: do comma and prosodic break have parallel functions?
    Kerkhofs R; Vonk W; Schriefers H; Chwilla DJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1224():102-18. PubMed ID: 18614156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of age, speed of processing, and working memory on comprehension of sentences with relative clauses.
    Caplan D; Dede G; Waters G; Michaud J; Tripodis Y
    Psychol Aging; 2011 Jun; 26(2):439-50. PubMed ID: 21480714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Searching High and Low: Prosodic Breaks Disambiguate Relative Clauses.
    Fromont LA; Soto-Faraco S; Biau E
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():96. PubMed ID: 28203214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The role of punctuation in implicit phonological processing during reading].
    Niikuni K; Muramoto T; Fukaya Y
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2012 Aug; 83(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 23012820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deaf readers' response to syntactic complexity: evidence from self-paced reading.
    Traxler MJ; Corina DP; Morford JP; Hafer S; Hoversten LJ;
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jan; 42(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 23868696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Working memory contributions to relative clause attachment processing: a hierarchical linear modeling analysis.
    Traxler MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):1107-21. PubMed ID: 17910193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prosodic influences on the resolution of temporary ambiguity during on-line sentence processing.
    Nagel HN; Shapiro LP; Tuller B; Nawy R
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1996 Mar; 25(2):319-44. PubMed ID: 8667301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.