137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33736590)
1. AlphaPart-R implementation of the method for partitioning genetic trends.
Obšteter J; Holl J; Hickey JM; Gorjanc G
Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Mar; 53(1):30. PubMed ID: 33736590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A method for partitioning trends in genetic mean and variance to understand breeding practices.
Oliveira TP; Obšteter J; Pocrnic I; Heslot N; Gorjanc G
Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jun; 55(1):36. PubMed ID: 37268883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of field data in pig genomic selection schemes: a simulation study.
Lillehammer M; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1025-32. PubMed ID: 26627382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic and economic evaluation of Japanese Black (Wagyu) cattle breeding schemes.
Kahi AK; Hirooka H
J Anim Sci; 2005 Sep; 83(9):2021-32. PubMed ID: 16100056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genomic selection for two traits in a maternal pig breeding scheme.
Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3079-87. PubMed ID: 23658351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Suitability of traits related to aggression and handleability for integration into pig breeding programmes: Genetic parameters and comparison between Gaussian and binary trait specifications.
König von Borstel U; Tönepöhl B; Appel AK; Voß B; Brandt H; Naderi S; Gauly M
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0204211. PubMed ID: 30592711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of breeding values for production traits in turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) using recursive models with or without genomics.
Abdalla EA; Wood BJ; Baes CF
Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Feb; 53(1):16. PubMed ID: 33593272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-benefit analysis of aquaculture breeding programs.
Janssen K; Saatkamp H; Komen H
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Jan; 50(1):2. PubMed ID: 29378517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. BWGS: A R package for genomic selection and its application to a wheat breeding programme.
Charmet G; Tran LG; Auzanneau J; Rincent R; Bouchet S
PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0222733. PubMed ID: 32240182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic parameters between slaughter pig efficiency and growth rate of different body tissues estimated by computed tomography in live boars of Landrace and Duroc.
Gjerlaug-Enger E; Kongsro J; Odegård J; Aass L; Vangen O
Animal; 2012 Jan; 6(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 22436149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of genotype x environment interaction on genetic gain in breeding programs.
Mulder HA; Bijma P
J Anim Sci; 2005 Jan; 83(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 15583042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigating the impact of preselection on subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluation of preselected animals.
Jibrila I; Ten Napel J; Vandenplas J; Veerkamp RF; Calus MPL
Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Jul; 52(1):42. PubMed ID: 32727349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of breeding strategies for polledness in dairy cattle using a newly developed simulation framework for quantitative and Mendelian traits.
Scheper C; Wensch-Dorendorf M; Yin T; Dressel H; Swalve H; König S
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):50. PubMed ID: 27357942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selective advantage of implementing optimal contributions selection and timescales for the convergence of long-term genetic contributions.
Howard DM; Pong-Wong R; Knap PW; Kremer VD; Woolliams JA
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 May; 50(1):24. PubMed ID: 29747576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian estimation of direct and correlated responses to selection on linear or ratio expressions of feed efficiency in pigs.
Shirali M; Varley PF; Jensen J
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Jun; 50(1):33. PubMed ID: 29925306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Moving from QTL experimental results to the utilization of QTL in breeding programmes.
Spelman RJ; Bovenhuis H
Anim Genet; 1998 Apr; 29(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 9699266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rindsel: an R package for phenotypic and molecular selection indices used in plant breeding.
Perez-Elizalde S; Cerón-Rojas JJ; Crossa J; Fleury D; Alvarado G
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1145():87-96. PubMed ID: 24816662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Most of the long-term genetic gain from optimum-contribution selection can be realised with restrictions imposed during optimisation.
Henryon M; Ostersen T; Ask B; Sørensen AC; Berg P
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):21. PubMed ID: 25887703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MATICCE: mapping transitions in continuous character evolution.
Hipp AL; Escudero M
Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 26(1):132-3. PubMed ID: 19880368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genetic and economic analyses of female replacement rates in the dam-daughter pathway of a hierarchical swine breeding structure.
Faust MA; Robison OW; Tess MW
J Anim Sci; 1992 Jul; 70(7):2053-64. PubMed ID: 1644678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
