These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33736590)

  • 21. Benefits of testing in both bio-secure and production environments in genomic selection breeding programs for commercial broiler chicken.
    Chu TT; Alemu SW; Norberg E; Sørensen AC; Henshall J; Hawken R; Jensen J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Nov; 50(1):52. PubMed ID: 30390619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The selection index--then, now, and for the future.
    Hazel LN; Dickerson GE; Freeman AE
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Oct; 77(10):3236-51. PubMed ID: 7836610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improvement of non-key traits in radiata pine breeding programme when long-term economic importance is uncertain.
    Li Y; Dungey H; Yanchuk A; Apiolaza LA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177806. PubMed ID: 28542558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The use of marker-assisted selection in animal breeding and biotechnology.
    Williams JL
    Rev Sci Tech; 2005 Apr; 24(1):379-91. PubMed ID: 16110903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Efficiency of genomic selection in a purebred pig male line.
    Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4164-76. PubMed ID: 22859761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Random forest methodology for model-based recursive partitioning: the mobForest package for R.
    Garge NR; Bobashev G; Eggleston B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Apr; 14():125. PubMed ID: 23577585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of breeding objectives for purebred and crossbred selection schemes for adoption in indigenous chicken breeding programmes.
    Okeno TO; Kahi AK; Peters KJ
    Br Poult Sci; 2013; 54(1):62-75. PubMed ID: 23444855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. SIMplyBee: an R package to simulate honeybee populations and breeding programs.
    Obšteter J; Strachan LK; Bubnič J; Prešern J; Gorjanc G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 May; 55(1):31. PubMed ID: 37161307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genetic parameters and predicted selection results for maternal traits related to lactation efficiency in sows.
    Bergsma R; Kanis E; Verstegen MW; Knol EF
    J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1067-80. PubMed ID: 18192550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Animal breeding strategies can improve meat quality attributes within entire populations.
    Berry DP; Conroy S; Pabiou T; Cromie AR
    Meat Sci; 2017 Oct; 132():6-18. PubMed ID: 28515004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of training on data from genetically-related lines on the accuracy of genomic predictions for feed efficiency traits in pigs.
    Aliakbari A; Delpuech E; Labrune Y; Riquet J; Gilbert H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Oct; 52(1):57. PubMed ID: 33028194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of genomic prediction using deregressed breeding values estimated from purebred and crossbred offspring phenotypes in pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Veroneze R; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26440000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
    Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genetic control of complex traits, with a focus on reproduction in pigs.
    Zak LJ; Gaustad AH; Bolarin A; Broekhuijse MLWJ; Walling GA; Knol EF
    Mol Reprod Dev; 2017 Sep; 84(9):1004-1011. PubMed ID: 28792084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hot topic: Effect of breeding strategies using genomic information on fitness and health.
    Egger-Danner C; Willam A; Fuerst C; Schwarzenbacher H; Fuerst-Waltl B
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4600-9. PubMed ID: 22818475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optimization of alternative breeding schemes for the genetic improvement of common Tigray highland sheep in northern Ethiopia.
    Haileselassie KW; Kebede SA; Letta MU; GebreMichael SG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Sep; 54(1):63. PubMed ID: 36114447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Appropriate selection indices for functional traits in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Chegini A; Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N; Hosseini Moghaddam SH; Shadparvar AA
    J Dairy Res; 2019 Feb; 86(1):13-18. PubMed ID: 30520398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Maximizing selection efficiency for categorical traits.
    Meuwissen TH; Engel B; van der Werf JH
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Jul; 73(7):1933-9. PubMed ID: 7592076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Partition of genetic trends by origin in Landrace and Large-White pigs.
    Škorput D; Gorjanc G; Kasap A; Luković Z
    Animal; 2015 Oct; 9(10):1605-9. PubMed ID: 26152894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.