These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33736845)

  • 1. Evaluation of alizarin and purpurin dyes for their ability to visualize latent fingermark on porous surfaces.
    Berkil Akar K
    Sci Justice; 2021 Mar; 61(2):130-141. PubMed ID: 33736845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Novel O-propyl, S-propyl, and N-propyl substituted 1,4-naphthoquinones and 1,4-anthraquinones as potential fingermark development reagents for porous surfaces.
    Berkil Akar K
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jan; 66(1):161-171. PubMed ID: 33090521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of fingermark detection sequences on paper substrates.
    Marriott C; Lee R; Wilkes Z; Comber B; Spindler X; Roux C; Lennard C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Mar; 236():30-7. PubMed ID: 24529772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Latent fingermark development on a range of porous substrates using ninhydrin analogs--a comparison with ninhydrin and 1,8-diazofluoren.
    Berdejo S; Rowe M; Bond JW
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):509-14. PubMed ID: 22103855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nile red: Alternative to physical developer for the detection of latent fingermarks on wet porous surfaces?
    Braasch K; de la Hunty M; Deppe J; Spindler X; Cantu AA; Maynard P; Lennard C; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jul; 230(1-3):74-80. PubMed ID: 23611533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An investigation into the enhancement of fingermarks in blood on paper with genipin and lawsone.
    Thomas P; Farrugia K
    Sci Justice; 2013 Sep; 53(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 23937940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thermal development of latent fingermarks on porous surfaces--further observations and refinements.
    Song DF; Sommerville D; Brown AG; Shimmon RG; Reedy BJ; Tahtouh M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jan; 204(1-3):97-110. PubMed ID: 20554406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visualising the past - An evaluation of processes and sequences for fingermark recovery from old documents.
    Bleay S; Fitzgerald L; Sears V; Kent T
    Sci Justice; 2019 Mar; 59(2):125-137. PubMed ID: 30798859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of inkjet printed amino acid fingerprint test targets for ninhydrin process monitoring - and some observations.
    Croxton R; Kent T; Littlewood A; Smith M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Apr; 321():110741. PubMed ID: 33706072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The detection of latent fingermarks on porous surfaces using amino acid sensitive reagents: a review.
    Jelly R; Patton EL; Lennard C; Lewis SW; Lim KF
    Anal Chim Acta; 2009 Oct; 652(1-2):128-42. PubMed ID: 19786173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Positive control tests for fingermark development reagents.
    Janssen-Bouwmeester R; Bremmer C; Koomen L; Siem-Gorré S; de Puit M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 May; 310():110259. PubMed ID: 32224429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visualising substrate-fingermark interactions: Solid-state NMR spectroscopy of amino acid reagent development on cellulose substrates.
    Spindler X; Shimmon R; Roux C; Lennard C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 May; 250():8-16. PubMed ID: 25766739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimisation and evaluation of 1,2-indanedione for use as a fingermark reagent and its application to real samples.
    Wallace-Kunkel C; Lennard C; Stoilovic M; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 May; 168(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 17046187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of storage conditions on fingermarks developed with 1,2-indanedione-ZnCl.
    Siem-Gorré S; Baiker-Sørensen M; Janssen-Bouwmeester R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Jul; 348():111727. PubMed ID: 37267830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigation of some of the factors influencing fingermark detection.
    Chadwick S; Moret S; Jayashanka N; Lennard C; Spindler X; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():381-389. PubMed ID: 29960948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The recovery of latent fingermarks from evidence exposed to ionizing radiation*.
    Colella M; Parkinson A; Evans T; Lennard C; Roux C
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 May; 54(3):583-90. PubMed ID: 19302380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ninhydrin thiohemiketals: basic research towards improved fingermark detection techniques employing nano-technology.
    Almog J; Glasner H
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):215-20. PubMed ID: 20002273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining the effects of routine fingermark detection techniques on the subsequent recovery and analysis of explosive residues on various substrates.
    King S; Benson S; Kelly T; Lennard C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Dec; 233(1-3):257-64. PubMed ID: 24314527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single metal deposition versus physical developer: A comparison between two advanced fingermark detection techniques.
    Moret S; Lee PLT; de la Hunty M; Spindler X; Lennard C; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jan; 294():103-112. PubMed ID: 30500490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    Olszowska-Łoś I; Ratajczyk T; Pieta IS; Siejca A; Niedziółka-Jönsson J; Leśniewski A
    Anal Chem; 2020 Dec; 92(23):15671-15678. PubMed ID: 33171042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.