160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33736862)
1. Comparison of two arbitrary cast transfer systems with a kinematic facebow for mounting a maxillary cast on a semiadjustable articulator.
Thompson GA; Nick C; Francisco P; Lux L; Wiens JP
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):597-603. PubMed ID: 33736862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the Kois Dento-Facial Analyzer System with an earbow for mounting a maxillary cast.
Lux LH; Thompson GA; Waliszewski KJ; Ziebert GJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):432-9. PubMed ID: 25979448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of virtually mounted dental casts from traditional facebow records, average values, and 3D facial scans.
Inoue N; Scialabba R; Lee JD; Lee SJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 35382941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro comparison of the maxillary occlusal plane orientation obtained with five facebow systems.
Maveli TC; Suprono MS; Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Bahjri K
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):566-73. PubMed ID: 26139043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Occlusal errors generated at the maxillary incisal edge position related to discrepancies in the arbitrary horizontal axis location and to the thickness of the interocclusal record.
Kois JC; Kois DE; Chaiyabutr Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):414-9. PubMed ID: 23998625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of sagittal inclination of the occlusal plane with Frankfort horizontal plane in facebow transfers to semiadjustable and fully adjustable articulators.
Palaskar JN; Joshi N; Gullapalli P; Shah P
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 31227235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of facebow and dentofacial analyzer mountings.
Galanis A; Ali M; Belles D; Koeppen RG
Tex Dent J; 2013 Oct; 130(10):1047-53. PubMed ID: 24354168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the performance of various virtual articulator mounting procedures: a self-controlled clinical study.
Lin H; Pan Y; Wei X; Wang Y; Yu H; Cheng H
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):4017-4028. PubMed ID: 37247089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the accuracy of a cone beam computed tomography-based virtual mounting technique with that of the conventional mounting technique using a facebow.
Kim SJ; Kang YJ; Kim JH
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37957064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro evaluation of the maxillary occlusal plane orientation obtained with an electronic application: A preliminary investigation.
Maveli TC; Suprono M; Kattadiyil MT; Bahjri K
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):146-151. PubMed ID: 28478988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy comparison of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator between an analog facebow record and a digital photography technique.
Revilla-León M; Zeitler JM; Strommer S; Barmak AB; Kois JC
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38609764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital to Analog Facially Generated Interchangeable Facebow Transfer: Capturing a Standardized Reference Position.
Kois JC; Kois DE; Zeitler JM; Martin J
J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(S1):13-22. PubMed ID: 34605582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the accuracy of a 3-dimensional virtual method and the conventional method for transferring the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator.
Solaberrieta E; Mínguez R; Barrenetxea L; Otegi JR; Szentpétery A
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 25557006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of three-dimensional position of maxillary dentition model treated with two digital transfer methods].
Peng TW; Ma T; Yang ZK; Zhang MD; Ren GH
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2024 Jan; 59(1):80-84. PubMed ID: 38172065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator by using analog and digital facebow record methods.
Revilla-León M; Zeitler JM; Barmak AB; Kois JC
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38641478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Geometric analysis of occlusal plane orientation using simulated ear-rod facebow transfer.
dos Santos Júnior J; Nelson SJ; Nummikoski P
J Prosthodont; 1996 Sep; 5(3):172-81. PubMed ID: 9028221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mounting casts on a mechanical articulator by using digital multisource data: A dental technique.
Kim JE; Kim SJ; Kwon DH; Shim JS; Kim JH
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 32033790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recording condylar movement with two facebow systems.
Hicks ST; Wood DP
Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 8863965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Face-bow record without a third point of reference: theoretical considerations and an alternative technique.
Ercoli C; Graser GN; Tallents RH; Galindo D
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 10424992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
