These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33736862)

  • 21. Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 2 articulator.
    Walker F; Ayoub AF; Moos KF; Barbenel J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 46(7):573-8. PubMed ID: 18462853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative study between 2 methods of mounting models in semiadjustable articulator for orthognathic surgery.
    Mayrink G; Sawazaki R; Asprino L; de Moraes M; Fernandes Moreira RW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):2879-82. PubMed ID: 21496992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 1 face bow.
    Walker F; Ayoub AF; Moos KF; Barbenel J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 46(7):567-72. PubMed ID: 18462852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of accuracy of transfer of the maxillary occlusal cant of two articulators using two facebow/semi-adjustable articulator systems: An in vivo study.
    Shetty S; Shenoy KK; Sabu A
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 27621543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of Two Facebow/Semi-adjustable Articulator Systems for Orienting Maxillary Cast on Articulators: A Pilot Study.
    Anusha CV; Singh AA; Sam G; Sangwan B; Shilpa M; Kamath AG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Apr; 17(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 27340168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of arbitrary and mean transfer of dental casts to the articulator on centric occlusal errors.
    Morneburg TR; Pröschel PA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Jun; 15(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 20336474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of the inclination of maxillary occlusal plane on mounted casts using a fixed value and customized nasion indicator in artex articulator: Facebow system - An in-vivo comparative study.
    Ramasamy M; Karthigeyan S; Giri TC; Rajendran V; Shetty A; Deivanai M
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2013 Jun; 5(Suppl 1):S54-9. PubMed ID: 23946578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is there a benefit of using an arbitrary facebow for the fabrication of a stabilization appliance?
    Shodadai SP; Türp JC; Gerds T; Strub JR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):517-22. PubMed ID: 12066697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison reproducibility between the facebow and a new technique based on a spirit level device.
    Almeida MG; Nassar MSP; Bataglion CAN; De Mello Filho FV; Terreri AL; Bataglion C
    Cranio; 2021 Jul; 39(4):344-350. PubMed ID: 31433268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cast articulation accuracy using rigid cast stabilization.
    Gunderson RB; Siegel SC
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 12087549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fabrication Method for a Mounting Jig and Cast Support for Mounting Complete Dentures.
    Dumbrigue HB; Dumbrigue EC; Tanaka M
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Aug; 28(7):833-836. PubMed ID: 30298537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A reevaluation of the axis-orbital plane and the use of orbitale in a facebow transfer record.
    Pitchford JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 1800732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from a clinical method and with cone beam computed tomography in dentate individuals.
    Das A; Muddugangadhar BC; Mawani DP; Mukhopadhyay A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):753-757. PubMed ID: 32423552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of eccentric tooth contact on a semi-adjustable articulator by using an occlusal analysis system.
    Jeong MY; Kim MJ; Lim YJ; Kwon HB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 35246320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Accuracy of Transferring Casts in Maximal Intercuspal Position to a Virtual Articulator.
    He M; Ding Q; Li L; Yang G; Zhao Y; Sun Y; Zhang L
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):326-332. PubMed ID: 34196456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is dynamic occlusal design necessary for anterior guidance recovery in the computer-aided design process? An in vitro study.
    Feng Y; Sun X; Li J; Liu W
    J Dent; 2024 Mar; 142():104833. PubMed ID: 38199326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of transferring analog dental casts to a virtual articulator.
    Úry E; Fornai C; Weber GW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):305-313. PubMed ID: 31227241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Determining the accuracy of articulator interchangeability and hinge axis reproducibility.
    Hatzi P; Millstein P; Maya A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):236-45. PubMed ID: 11264930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An Indirect Digital Technique to Transfer 3D Printed Casts to a Mechanical Articulator With Individual Sagittal Condylar Inclination Settings Using CBCT and Intraoral Scans.
    Yang S; Dong B; Zhang Q; Li J; Yuan Q; Yue L
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 31(9):822-827. PubMed ID: 35864801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Custom adaptation of an occlusal plane analyzer to a semiadjustable articulator.
    Toothaker RW; Graves AR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Feb; 81(2):240-2. PubMed ID: 9922442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.