These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33737318)

  • 21. Before and beyond trust: reliance in medical AI.
    Kerasidou CX; Kerasidou A; Buscher M; Wilkinson S
    J Med Ethics; 2022 Nov; 48(11):852-856. PubMed ID: 34426519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Trust Framework and Maturity Model: Applying an Entropy Lens to Improve Security, Privacy, and Ethical AI.
    Mylrea M; Robinson N
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Oct; 25(10):. PubMed ID: 37895550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. "Just" accuracy? Procedural fairness demands explainability in AI-based medical resource allocations.
    Rueda J; Rodríguez JD; Jounou IP; Hortal-Carmona J; Ausín T; Rodríguez-Arias D
    AI Soc; 2022 Dec; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 36573157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Challenges of artificial intelligence in medicine and dermatology.
    Grzybowski A; Jin K; Wu H
    Clin Dermatol; 2024; 42(3):210-215. PubMed ID: 38184124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Limits of trust in medical AI.
    Hatherley JJ
    J Med Ethics; 2020 Jul; 46(7):478-481. PubMed ID: 32220870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [How trustworthy is artificial intelligence? : A model for the conflict between objectivity and subjectivity].
    Schlicker N; Langer M; Hirsch MC
    Inn Med (Heidelb); 2023 Nov; 64(11):1051-1057. PubMed ID: 37737496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Trust does not need to be human: it is possible to trust medical AI.
    Ferrario A; Loi M; Viganò E
    J Med Ethics; 2020 Nov; 47(6):437-8. PubMed ID: 33239471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Opening the black box of AI-Medicine.
    Poon AIF; Sung JJY
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Mar; 36(3):581-584. PubMed ID: 33709609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. AI-driven decision support systems and epistemic reliance: a qualitative study on obstetricians' and midwives' perspectives on integrating AI-driven CTG into clinical decision making.
    Dlugatch R; Georgieva A; Kerasidou A
    BMC Med Ethics; 2024 Jan; 25(1):6. PubMed ID: 38184595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Who is responsible? US Public perceptions of AI governance through the lenses of trust and ethics.
    David P; Choung H; Seberger JS
    Public Underst Sci; 2024 Jul; 33(5):654-672. PubMed ID: 38326971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Learning to Live with Strange Error: Beyond Trustworthiness in Artificial Intelligence Ethics.
    Rathkopf C; Heinrichs B
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2023 Jan; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 36621773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Healthy Mistrust: Medical Black Box Algorithms, Epistemic Authority, and Preemptionism.
    Wolkenstein A
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2024 Jan; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 38220470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR).
    Elliott K; Price R; Shaw P; Spiliotopoulos T; Ng M; Coopamootoo K; van Moorsel A
    Society; 2021; 58(3):179-188. PubMed ID: 34149122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ethical and Legal Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Medicine.
    Currie G; Hawk KE
    Semin Nucl Med; 2021 Mar; 51(2):120-125. PubMed ID: 33509368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The integration and implications of artificial intelligence in forensic science.
    Tynan P
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38175310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Call for the responsible artificial intelligence in the healthcare.
    Upadhyay U; Gradisek A; Iqbal U; Dhar E; Li YC; Syed-Abdul S
    BMJ Health Care Inform; 2023 Dec; 30(1):. PubMed ID: 38135293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Responsibility, second opinions and peer-disagreement: ethical and epistemological challenges of using AI in clinical diagnostic contexts.
    Kempt H; Nagel SK
    J Med Ethics; 2022 Apr; 48(4):222-229. PubMed ID: 34907006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations.
    Ueda D; Kakinuma T; Fujita S; Kamagata K; Fushimi Y; Ito R; Matsui Y; Nozaki T; Nakaura T; Fujima N; Tatsugami F; Yanagawa M; Hirata K; Yamada A; Tsuboyama T; Kawamura M; Fujioka T; Naganawa S
    Jpn J Radiol; 2024 Jan; 42(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 37540463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Putting explainable AI in context: institutional explanations for medical AI.
    Theunissen M; Browning J
    Ethics Inf Technol; 2022; 24(2):23. PubMed ID: 35539962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Transparency as design publicity: explaining and justifying inscrutable algorithms.
    Loi M; Ferrario A; Viganò E
    Ethics Inf Technol; 2021; 23(3):253-263. PubMed ID: 34867077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.