277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33738574)
1. Efficiency of retrograde intrarenal surgery in lower pole stones: disposable flexible ureterorenoscope or reusable flexible ureterorenoscope?
Göger YE; Özkent MS; Kılınç MT; Taşkapu HH; Göger E; Aydın A; Sönmez MG; Karalezli G
World J Urol; 2021 Sep; 39(9):3643-3650. PubMed ID: 33738574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Use and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes for Renal Stone Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Jun DY; Cho KS; Jeong JY; Moon YJ; Kang DH; Jung HD; Lee JY
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Oct; 58(10):. PubMed ID: 36295549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative.
Ozimek T; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Cordes J; Chlosta PL; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1226-1230. PubMed ID: 29073769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultra-Mini PCNL, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy on the Treatment of 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi.
Zhang H; Hong TY; Li G; Jiang N; Hu C; Cui X; Chu C; Zhao JL
Urol Int; 2019; 102(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 30352443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes as a Safe and Effective Choice for the Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized-Controlled Trial.
Yang E; Jing S; Niu Y; Qi S; Yadav PK; Yang L; Bao J; Tian J; Wang J; Li N; Ou T; Wang Z
J Endourol; 2021 Dec; 35(12):1773-1778. PubMed ID: 34375127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Flexible ureteroscopy for lower pole calculus: is it still a challenge?
Shrestha A; Adhikari B; Panthier F; Baidya S; Gauhar V; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2023 Nov; 41(11):3345-3353. PubMed ID: 37728745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial experience with slimmest single-use flexible ureteroscope Uscope PU3033A (PUSEN™) in retrograde intrarenal surgery and its comparison with Uscope PU3022a: a single-center prospective study.
Agrawal S; Patil A; Sabnis RB; Singh AG; Ganpule AP; Desai MR
World J Urol; 2021 Oct; 39(10):3957-3962. PubMed ID: 33970313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Clinical experience with reusable and single use flexible ureterorenoscopes].
Kutluev MM; Grigiriev NA; Safiullin RI
Urologiia; 2023 Sep; (4):19-22. PubMed ID: 37850276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a new choice for intrarenal stone patients.
Xu C; Song RJ; Jiang MJ; Qin C; Wang XL; Zhang W
Urol Int; 2015; 94(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 25074621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laser fibre, rather than the stone, may harm the scope: retrospective monocentric analysis of 26 pre- and intraoperative factors of flexible ureteroscope (fURS) damage.
Ozimek T; Cordes J; Gilbert N; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Schneider MH; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):2035-2040. PubMed ID: 31659464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Prospective Case-Control Study Comparing LithoVue, a Single-Use, Flexible Disposable Ureteroscope, with Flexible, Reusable Fiber-Optic Ureteroscopes.
Usawachintachit M; Isaacson DS; Taguchi K; Tzou DT; Hsi RS; Sherer BA; Stoller ML; Chi T
J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):468-475. PubMed ID: 28287823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pelvicalyceal anatomy on the accessibility of reusable flexible ureteroscopy to lower pole calyx during retrograde intrarenal surgery.
Inoue T; Hamamoto S; Okada S; Imai S; Yamamichi F; Fujita M; Tominaga K; Fujisawa M
Int J Urol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):220-225. PubMed ID: 36305835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of intermediate proximal ureteral and renal stones in the elderly.
Hu H; Lu Y; He D; Cui L; Zhang J; Zhao Z; Qin B; Wang Y; Lin F; Wang S
Urolithiasis; 2016 Oct; 44(5):427-34. PubMed ID: 26705003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a new disposable flexible ureterorenoscope and comparison to an established disposable flexible ureterorenoscope: a prospective, observational study.
Patterson K; Yap LC; Elamin M; Maccraith E; Muheilan M; Sharif A; McGuinness G; Darcy F; Brady C; Hennessey D
Int Urol Nephrol; 2021 May; 53(5):875-881. PubMed ID: 33386582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser fragmentation for renal stones: comparison between digital and conventional ureteroscope.
Somani BK; Al-Qahtani SM; de Medina SD; Traxer O
Urology; 2013 Nov; 82(5):1017-9. PubMed ID: 24001703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Steep Infundibulopelvic Angle as a New Risk Factor for Flexible Ureteroscope Damage and Complicated Postoperative Course.
Ozimek T; Cordes J; Wiessmeyer JR; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Gilbert N; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
J Endourol; 2018 Jul; 32(7):597-602. PubMed ID: 29737199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of suctioning and traditional ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal stones.
Zhu Z; Cui Y; Zeng F; Li Y; Chen Z; Hequn C
World J Urol; 2019 May; 37(5):921-929. PubMed ID: 30120500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-use flexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review.
Davis NF; Quinlan MR; Browne C; Bhatt NR; Manecksha RP; D'Arcy FT; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM
World J Urol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):529-536. PubMed ID: 29177820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with a reusable ureteroscope for the management of paediatric urolithiasis.
Mille E; El-Khoury E; Haddad M; Pinol J; Charbonnier M; Gastaldi P; Dariel A; Merrot T; Faure A
J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Jun; 19(3):248.e1-248.e6. PubMed ID: 36746718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Management of complex renal stones by a novel ureterorenoscope with vacuum suctioning system combined with flexible ureteroscope].
Chen ZH; Liu C; Li KW; Lai C; Wu ZY; Zhu JM; Zhou JH; Xu KW
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Oct; 101(38):3127-3133. PubMed ID: 34674422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
