These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33738742)

  • 21. The effects of FDI and government expenditures on environmental pollution in Korea: the pollution haven hypothesis revisited.
    Bulus GC; Koc S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jul; 28(28):38238-38253. PubMed ID: 33733418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Revisiting the pollution haven hypothesis in ASEAN-5 countries: new insights from panel data analysis.
    Guzel AE; Okumus İ
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 May; 27(15):18157-18167. PubMed ID: 32172423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The roles of foreign direct investments, economic growth, and capital investments in decarbonizing the economy of Oman.
    Hamid I; Alam MS; Murshed M; Jena PK; Sha N; Alam MN
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(15):22122-22138. PubMed ID: 34782975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does technology innovation matter for environmental pollution? Testing the pollution halo/haven hypothesis for Asian countries.
    Abbass K; Song H; Mushtaq Z; Khan F
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Dec; 29(59):89753-89771. PubMed ID: 35857164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A sectoral analysis of the role of Foreign Direct Investment in pollution and energy transition in OECD countries.
    Caetano RV; Marques AC; Afonso TL; Vieira I
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jan; 302(Pt A):114018. PubMed ID: 34731712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in Asian countries.
    Abbasi MA; Nosheen M; Rahman HU
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(17):49270-49289. PubMed ID: 36764996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does the pollution halo hypothesis exist in this "better" world? The evidence from STIRPAT model.
    Nguyen-Thanh N; Chin KH; Nguyen V
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Dec; 29(58):87082-87096. PubMed ID: 35804228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Do foreign direct investment inflows affect environmental degradation in BRICS nations?
    Pradhan AK; Sachan A; Sahu UK; Mohindra V
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(1):690-701. PubMed ID: 34338985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relationship between inward FDI and environmental degradation for Pakistan: an exploration of pollution haven hypothesis through ARDL approach.
    Nadeem AM; Ali T; Khan MTI; Guo Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 May; 27(13):15407-15425. PubMed ID: 32072420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Testing pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses for Turkey: a new perspective.
    Mert M; Caglar AE
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Sep; 27(26):32933-32943. PubMed ID: 32524397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The carbon dioxide neutralizing effect of energy innovation on international tourism in EU-5 countries under the prism of the EKC hypothesis.
    Balsalobre-Lorente D; Driha OM; Leitão NC; Murshed M
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Nov; 298():113513. PubMed ID: 34403918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of hydro-biofuel-wind energy consumption on environmental cost of doing business in a panel of BRICS countries: evidence from three-stage least squares estimator.
    Zaman K
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Feb; 25(5):4479-4490. PubMed ID: 29185224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Environmental impacts of FDI: evidence from heterogeneous panel methods.
    Arif U; Arif A; Khan FN
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Apr; 29(16):23639-23649. PubMed ID: 34813013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Energy consumption, FDI, and urbanization linkage in coastal Mediterranean countries: re-assessing the pollution haven hypothesis.
    Nathaniel S; Aguegboh E; Iheonu C; Sharma G; Shah M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Oct; 27(28):35474-35487. PubMed ID: 32594434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Trade, FDI, and CO
    Mahmood H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(6):14439-14454. PubMed ID: 36152100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ecological implication of offshored economic activities in Turkey: foreign direct investment perspective.
    Udemba EN
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Oct; 27(30):38015-38028. PubMed ID: 32617824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The environmental cost of FDI and spatial implications of CO2 emissions in Sub-Saharan Africa.
    Abbas SJ; Iqbal A; Hussain MM; Anwar A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jun; 30(29):74441-74451. PubMed ID: 37209336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. EKC hypothesis testing and environmental impacts of transportation infrastructure investments in China, Turkey, India, and Japan.
    Wang W; Ali A; Wang H; Feng Y; Dai S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jul; 30(34):81600-81615. PubMed ID: 37204576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of FDI on GHG emissions in BRI countries using spatial econometric analysis strategy: the significance of biomass energy consumption.
    Abdo AB; Li B; Qahtan ASA; Abdulsalam A; Aloqab A; Obadi W
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Aug; 29(36):54571-54595. PubMed ID: 35304721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Examining foreign direct investment and environmental pollution linkage in Asia.
    Khan MA; Ozturk I
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Mar; 27(7):7244-7255. PubMed ID: 31879883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.