160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33738800)
1. Robust estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects using electronic health record data.
Li R; Wang H; Tu W
Stat Med; 2021 May; 40(11):2713-2752. PubMed ID: 33738800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
Linden A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
Waernbaum I
Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of the average treatment effect with variable selection and measurement error simultaneously addressed for potential confounders.
Yi GY; Chen LP
Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Apr; 32(4):691-711. PubMed ID: 36694932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Machine learning outcome regression improves doubly robust estimation of average causal effects.
Choi BY; Wang CP; Gelfond J
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Sep; 29(9):1120-1133. PubMed ID: 32716126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Targeted estimation of nuisance parameters to obtain valid statistical inference.
van der Laan MJ
Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(1):29-57. PubMed ID: 24516006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subclassification estimation of the weighted average treatment effect.
Choi BY
Biom J; 2021 Dec; 63(8):1706-1728. PubMed ID: 34270815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-step estimation in ratio-of-mediator-probability weighted causal mediation analysis.
Bein E; Deutsch J; Hong G; Porter KE; Qin X; Yang C
Stat Med; 2018 Apr; 37(8):1304-1324. PubMed ID: 29322536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.
Hattori S; Henmi M
Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24571129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiply robust estimation of causal quantile treatment effects.
Xie Y; Cotton C; Zhu Y
Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(28):4238-4251. PubMed ID: 32857876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Causal inference for recurrent event data using pseudo-observations.
Su CL; Platt RW; Plante JF
Biostatistics; 2022 Jan; 23(1):189-206. PubMed ID: 32432686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using a monotone single-index model to stabilize the propensity score in missing data problems and causal inference.
Qin J; Yu T; Li P; Liu H; Chen B
Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(8):1442-1458. PubMed ID: 30566258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An alternative robust estimator of average treatment effect in causal inference.
Liu J; Ma Y; Wang L
Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):910-923. PubMed ID: 29441521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Case Study of the Impact of Data-Adaptive Versus Model-Based Estimation of the Propensity Scores on Causal Inferences from Three Inverse Probability Weighting Estimators.
Neugebauer R; Schmittdiel JA; van der Laan MJ
Int J Biostat; 2016 May; 12(1):131-55. PubMed ID: 27227720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robust Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: An Algorithm-based Approach.
Li R; Wang H; Zhao Y; Su J; Tu W
Commun Stat Simul Comput; 2023; 52(10):4981-4998. PubMed ID: 38105918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Collaborative targeted learning using regression shrinkage.
Schnitzer ME; Cefalu M
Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(4):530-543. PubMed ID: 29094375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Doubly robust estimation and sensitivity analysis for marginal structural quantile models.
Cheng C; Hu L; Li F
Biometrics; 2024 Mar; 80(2):. PubMed ID: 38884127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An alternative empirical likelihood method in missing response problems and causal inference.
Ren K; Drummond CA; Brewster PS; Haller ST; Tian J; Cooper CJ; Zhang B
Stat Med; 2016 Nov; 35(27):5009-5028. PubMed ID: 27417265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Causal inference with noisy data: Bias analysis and estimation approaches to simultaneously addressing missingness and misclassification in binary outcomes.
Shu D; Yi GY
Stat Med; 2020 Feb; 39(4):456-468. PubMed ID: 31802532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing approaches to causal inference for longitudinal data: inverse probability weighting versus propensity scores.
Ertefaie A; Stephens DA
Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 14. PubMed ID: 21969998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
