These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33740105)

  • 1. Partial repetition between action plans delays responses to ideomotor compatible stimuli.
    Fournier LR; Richardson BP
    Psychol Res; 2022 Mar; 86(2):627-641. PubMed ID: 33740105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Partial Repetition Costs are Reduced but not Eliminated with Practice.
    Fournier LR; Richardson BP; Logan GD
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):37. PubMed ID: 36072096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Action plans can interact to hinder or facilitate reach performance.
    Fournier LR; Wiediger MD; Taddese EF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2755-67. PubMed ID: 26163065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the importance of being first: serial order effects in the interaction between action plans and ongoing actions.
    Fournier LR; Gallimore JM; Feiszli KR; Logan GD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Feb; 21(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 23896745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Action plan interrupted: resolution of proactive interference while coordinating execution of multiple action plans during sleep deprivation.
    Fournier LR; Hansen DA; Stubblefield AM; Van Dongen HPA
    Psychol Res; 2020 Mar; 84(2):454-467. PubMed ID: 30006887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mirror neuron activation as a function of explicit learning: changes in mu-event-related power after learning novel responses to ideomotor compatible, partially compatible, and non-compatible stimuli.
    Behmer LP; Fournier LR
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 44(10):2774-2785. PubMed ID: 27608438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interference due to shared features between action plans is influenced by working memory span.
    Fournier LR; Behmer LP; Stubblefield AM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1524-9. PubMed ID: 24715506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Free-choice and forced-choice actions: Shared representations and conservation of cognitive effort.
    Richardson B; Pfister R; Fournier LR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2516-2530. PubMed ID: 32080805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A review of contemporary ideomotor theory.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW; Capaldi EJ
    Psychol Bull; 2010 Nov; 136(6):943-74. PubMed ID: 20822210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relation of perception and motor action: ideomotor compatibility and interference in divided attention.
    Klapp ST; Porter-Graham KA; Hoifjeld AR
    J Mot Behav; 1991 Sep; 23(3):155-62. PubMed ID: 14766513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bypassing the central bottleneck with easy tasks: Beyond ideomotor compatibility.
    Lyphout-Spitz M; Maquestiaux F; Ruthruff E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):501-511. PubMed ID: 34755320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What makes an event: temporal integration of stimuli or actions?
    Fournier LR; Gallimore JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1293-305. PubMed ID: 23661159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strong evidence for ideomotor theory: Unwilled manifestation of the conceptual attribute in movement control.
    Shin YK; Choe S; Kwon OS
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1066839. PubMed ID: 37082575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The functional role of working memory in the (re-)planning and execution of grasping movements.
    Spiegel MA; Koester D; Schack T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1326-39. PubMed ID: 23339349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Encoding, storage, and response preparation-Distinct EEG correlates of stimulus and action representations in working memory.
    Schneider D; Zickerick B; Thönes S; Wascher E
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Jun; 57(6):e13577. PubMed ID: 32259293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 18845280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intervening response events between identification targets do not always turn repetition benefits into repetition costs.
    Hilchey MD; Rajsic J; Huffman G; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Apr; 79(3):807-819. PubMed ID: 28063136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing boundary conditions of the ideomotor hypothesis using a delayed response task.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Nov; 141(3):360-72. PubMed ID: 23089044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation of noise stimuli.
    Mattson PS; Fournier LR
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1236-47. PubMed ID: 18927040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ideomotor-compatible tasks partially escape dual-task interference in both young and elderly adults.
    Hartley AA; Seaman B; Maquestiaux F
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Mar; 30(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 25689613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.