274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33740253)
1. Development and validation of the Dynamic Collimation Monte Carlo simulation package for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Nelson NP; Culberson WS; Hyer DE; Geoghegan TJ; Patwardhan KA; Smith BR; Flynn RT; Yu J; Rana S; Gutiérrez AN; Hill PM
Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):3172-3185. PubMed ID: 33740253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Design of a focused collimator for proton therapy spot scanning using Monte Carlo methods.
Geoghegan TJ; Nelson NP; Flynn RT; Hill PM; Rana S; Hyer DE
Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):2725-2734. PubMed ID: 32170750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental and Monte Carlo characterization of a dynamic collimation system prototype for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Smith BR; Pankuch M; Hyer DE; Culberson WS
Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):5343-5356. PubMed ID: 33411329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PETRA: A pencil beam trimming algorithm for analytical proton therapy dose calculations with the dynamic collimation system.
Bennett LC; Hyer DE; Erhart K; Nelson NP; Culberson WS; Smith BR; Hill PM; Flynn RT
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):7263-7280. PubMed ID: 37370239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The dosimetric enhancement of GRID profiles using an external collimator in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Smith BR; Nelson NP; Geoghegan TJ; Patwardhan KA; Hill PM; Yu J; Gutiérrez AN; Allen BG; Hyer DE
Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2684-2698. PubMed ID: 35120278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigating aperture-based approximations to model a focused dynamic collimation system for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Nelson NP; Culberson WS; Hyer DE; Smith BR; Flynn RT; Hill PM
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2022 Feb; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 35130520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric delivery validation of dynamically collimated pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Nelson NP; Culberson WS; Hyer DE; Geoghegan TJ; Patwardhan KA; Smith BR; Flynn RT; Yu J; Gutiérrez AN; Hill PM
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Feb; 68(5):. PubMed ID: 36706460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental validation of the TOPAS Monte Carlo system for passive scattering proton therapy.
Testa M; Schümann J; Lu HM; Shin J; Faddegon B; Perl J; Paganetti H
Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121719. PubMed ID: 24320505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy with multi-leaf collimator calculated by a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine.
Tominaga Y; Sakurai Y; Miyata J; Harada S; Akagi T; Oita M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 23(12):e13817. PubMed ID: 36420959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integration and dosimetric validation of a dynamic collimation system for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Nelson NP; Culberson WS; Hyer DE; Geoghegan TJ; Patwardhan KA; Smith BR; Flynn RT; Gutiérrez AN; Boland T; Hill PM
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Oct; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 37832529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A Monte Carlo study on the collimation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy beams.
Charlwood FC; Aitkenhead AH; Mackay RI
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1462-72. PubMed ID: 26936730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of a Monte Carlo model for multi leaf collimator based electron delivery.
Kaluarachchi MM; Saleh ZH; Schwer ML; Klein EE
Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3586-3599. PubMed ID: 32324289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimization of proton pencil beam positioning in collimated fields.
Behrends C; Bäumer C; Verbeek NG; Wulff J; Timmermann B
Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2540-2551. PubMed ID: 36609847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation and clinical implementation of an accurate Monte Carlo code for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Huang S; Kang M; Souris K; Ainsley C; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Simone CB; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):558-572. PubMed ID: 30058170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An MCNPX Monte Carlo model of a discrete spot scanning proton beam therapy nozzle.
Sawakuchi GO; Mirkovic D; Perles LA; Sahoo N; Zhu XR; Ciangaru G; Suzuki K; Gillin MT; Mohan R; Titt U
Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4960-70. PubMed ID: 20964215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Design and commissioning of the non-dedicated scanning proton beamline for ocular treatment at the synchrotron-based CNAO facility.
Ciocca M; Magro G; Mastella E; Mairani A; Mirandola A; Molinelli S; Russo S; Vai A; Fiore MR; Mosci C; Valvo F; Via R; Baroni G; Orecchia R
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1852-1862. PubMed ID: 30659616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extended in-field and out-of-field validation of a compact Monte Carlo model of an IBA PROTEUS
Colson D; Blommaert J; Poels K; De Saint-Hubert M; Reniers B; Depuydt T
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Oct; 68(21):. PubMed ID: 37844576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Producing a Beam Model of the Varian ProBeam Proton Therapy System using TOPAS Monte Carlo Toolkit.
Rahman M; Bruza P; Lin Y; Gladstone DJ; Pogue BW; Zhang R
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6500-6508. PubMed ID: 33030241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields.
Padilla-Cabal F; Alejandro Fragoso J; Franz Resch A; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 31661559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single pencil beam benchmark of a module for Monte Carlo simulation of proton transport in the PENELOPE code.
Verbeek N; Wulff J; Bäumer C; Smyczek S; Timmermann B; Brualla L
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):456-476. PubMed ID: 33217026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
