These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33740748)

  • 21. Downgrading, downsizing, degazettement, and reclassification of protected areas in Brazil.
    Bernard E; Penna LA; Araújo E
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):939-50. PubMed ID: 24724978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Formulating win-win management plans in Protected Areas (PAs) based on Key Ecosystem services (KESs): An application in the Shennongjia National Park, China.
    Zhang B; Min Q; Jiao W
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Oct; 320():115831. PubMed ID: 35944324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Top-down and bottom-up processes to implement biological monitoring in protected areas.
    Cowell C; Bissett C; Ferreira SM
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Mar; 257():109998. PubMed ID: 31868648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluating economic impacts of protected areas in contexts with limited data; the case of three national parks in Iceland.
    Siltanen J; Petursson JG; Cook D; Davidsdottir B
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Sep; 342():118085. PubMed ID: 37229934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A quantitative analysis of biodiversity and the recreational value of potential national parks in Denmark.
    Larsen FW; Petersen AH; Strange N; Lund MP; Rahbek C
    Environ Manage; 2008 May; 41(5):685-95. PubMed ID: 18299919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An evaluation of contemporary savanna fire regimes in the Canastra National Park, Brazil: Outcomes of fire suppression policies.
    Batista EKL; Russell-Smith J; França H; Figueira JEC
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jan; 205():40-49. PubMed ID: 28964973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cross-scale and social-ecological changes constitute main threats to private land conservation in South Africa.
    Clements HS; Biggs R; Cumming GS
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Nov; 274():111235. PubMed ID: 32823084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Brazilian national parks at risk.
    Ruaro R; Laurance W; Mormul RP
    Science; 2020 Feb; 367(6481):990. PubMed ID: 32108106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Disputed Territories in Southeastern Brazil: Effects of the Serra da Bocaina National Park on Nearby Coastal Communities.
    de Freitas RR; de Araujo LG
    Environ Manage; 2020 Dec; 66(6):1012-1023. PubMed ID: 33037896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Economic valuation of the ecosystem services provided by a protected area in the Brazilian Cerrado: application of the contingent valuation method.
    Resende FM; Fernandes GW; Andrade DC; Néder HD
    Braz J Biol; 2017 Nov; 77(4):762-773. PubMed ID: 28562788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reprint of: COVID-19 messaging in U.S. state parks: Extensions of the outdoor recreation strategies and practices framework unmasked by the pandemic.
    Perry EE; Coleman KJ; Iretskaia TA; Baer JM; Magnus LF; Pettengill PR
    J Outdoor Recreat Tour; 2023 Mar; 41():100627. PubMed ID: 37521269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. COVID-19 messaging in U.S. state parks: Extensions of the outdoor recreation strategies and practices framework unmasked by the pandemic.
    Perry EE; Coleman KJ; Iretskaia TA; Baer JM; Magnus LF; Pettengill PR
    J Outdoor Recreat Tour; 2021 Dec; 36():100449. PubMed ID: 38620957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Defining the balance point between conservation and development.
    Tian D; Xie Y; Barnosky AD; Wei F
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):231-238. PubMed ID: 30225849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Creating Conditions for Policy Change in National Parks: Contrasting Cases in Yellowstone and Yosemite.
    Yochim MJ; Lowry WR
    Environ Manage; 2016 May; 57(5):1041-53. PubMed ID: 26884141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Resilience assessment framework for critical infrastructure in a multi-hazard environment: Case study on transport assets.
    Argyroudis SA; Mitoulis SA; Hofer L; Zanini MA; Tubaldi E; Frangopol DM
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Apr; 714():136854. PubMed ID: 32018987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Change in landscape and ecosystems services as the basis of monitoring natural protected areas: a case study in the Picos de Europa National Park (Spain).
    De Pablo CL; Peñalver-Alcázar M; De Agar PM
    Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Mar; 192(4):220. PubMed ID: 32146535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A method to identify drivers of societal change likely to affect natural assets in the future, illustrated with Australia's native biodiversity.
    Pepper DA; Lada H; Thomson JR; Bakar KS; Lake PS; Mac Nally R
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Mar; 581-582():80-86. PubMed ID: 27979625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measuring benefits of protected area management: trends across realms and research gaps for freshwater systems.
    Adams VM; Setterfield SA; Douglas MM; Kennard MJ; Ferdinands K
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Nov; 370(1681):. PubMed ID: 26460127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Socioeconomic differences among resident, users and neighbour populations of a protected area in the Brazilian dry forest.
    Specht MJ; Santos BA; Marshall N; Melo FPL; Leal IR; Tabarelli M; Baldauf C
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():607-614. PubMed ID: 30522067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Land use dynamics and future scenarios of the Rio Doce State Park buffer zone, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
    De Oliveira BR; Da Costa EL; Carvalho-Ribeiro SM; Maia-Barbosa PM
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Dec; 192(1):39. PubMed ID: 31832791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.