179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33740840)
21. Could sperm grade under high magnification condition predict IMSI clinical outcome?
Sifer C; El Khattabi L; Dupont C; Sermondade N; Herbemont C; Porcher R; Cedrin-Durnerin I; Faure C; Lévy R; Grynberg M; Poncelet C; Hugues JN
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Oct; 181():189-94. PubMed ID: 25150959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sperm content of TXNDC8 reflects sperm chromatin structure, pregnancy establishment, and incidence of multiple births after ART.
Ahlering P; Sutovsky M; Gliedt D; Branson K; Miranda Vizuete A; Sutovsky P
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2020 Oct; 66(5):311-321. PubMed ID: 32851881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multivariate analyses for determining the association of field porcine fertility with sperm motion traits analysed by computer-assisted semen analysis and with sperm morphology.
Kummer AB; Gaggini TS; Bernardi ML; McManus C; Gonçales EM; Wentz I; Bortolozzo FP
Reprod Domest Anim; 2013 Oct; 48(5):747-54. PubMed ID: 23496757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. OpenCASA: A new open-source and scalable tool for sperm quality analysis.
Alquézar-Baeta C; Gimeno-Martos S; Miguel-Jiménez S; Santolaria P; Yániz J; Palacín I; Casao A; Cebrián-Pérez JÁ; Muiño-Blanco T; Pérez-Pé R
PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Jan; 15(1):e1006691. PubMed ID: 30657753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of two staining techniques on the manual and automated canine sperm morphology analysis.
Surmacz P; Niwinska A; Kautz E; Gizinski S; Faundez R
Reprod Domest Anim; 2022 Jun; 57(6):678-684. PubMed ID: 35212033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Motility assessment of porcine spermatozoa: a comparison of methods.
Vyt P; Maes D; Rijsselaere T; Dejonckheere E; Castryck F; Van Soom A
Reprod Domest Anim; 2004 Dec; 39(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 15598237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Real-time automated tracking and trapping system for sperm.
Shi LZ; Nascimento J; Chandsawangbhuwana C; Berns MW; Botvinick EL
Microsc Res Tech; 2006 Nov; 69(11):894-902. PubMed ID: 16892192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of technical settings and semen handling upon motility characteristics of dog spermatozoa measured using computer-aided sperm analysis.
Smith SC; England GC
J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 2001; 57():151-9. PubMed ID: 11787144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of the Sperm Quality Analyzer.
Johnston RC; Clarke GN; Liu DY; Baker HW
Fertil Steril; 1995 May; 63(5):1071-6. PubMed ID: 7720920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative analysis of in vitro characteristics of fresh and frozen-thawed urethral and epididymal spermatozoa from cats (Felis domesticus).
Prochowska S; Niżański W; Partyka A
Theriogenology; 2016 Nov; 86(8):2063-72. PubMed ID: 27501869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sperm with large nuclear vacuoles and semen quality in the evaluation of male infertility.
Komiya A; Watanabe A; Kawauchi Y; Fuse H
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2013 Feb; 59(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 23072254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. HT-COMET: a novel automated approach for high throughput assessment of human sperm chromatin quality.
Albert O; Reintsch WE; Chan P; Robaire B
Hum Reprod; 2016 May; 31(5):938-46. PubMed ID: 26975326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dietary supplementation of antioxidants improves semen quality of IVF patients in terms of motility, sperm count, and nuclear vacuolization.
Wirleitner B; Vanderzwalmen P; Stecher A; Spitzer D; Schuff M; Schwerda D; Bach M; Schechinger B; Herbert Zech N
Int J Vitam Nutr Res; 2012 Dec; 82(6):391-8. PubMed ID: 23823924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of Two Different Methods Used for Semen Evaluation: Analysis of Semen Samples from 1,055 Men.
Dinçer M; Kucukdurmaz F; Salabas E; Ortac M; Aktan G; Kadioglu A
Urol Int; 2017; 98(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 27328116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Status of sperm morphology assessment: an evaluation of methodology and clinical value.
van den Hoven L; Hendriks JC; Verbeet JG; Westphal JR; Wetzels AM
Fertil Steril; 2015 Jan; 103(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 25450299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of sperm adenosine triphosphate content, motility and fertility of immobilized and conventionally cryopreserved Norwegian Red bull semen.
Berg HF; Kommisrud E; Bai G; Gaustad ER; Klinkenberg G; Standerholen FB; Thorkildsen LT; Waterhouse KE; Ropstad E; Heringstad B; Alm-Kristiansen AH
Theriogenology; 2018 Nov; 121():181-187. PubMed ID: 30165307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Performance evaluation of sperm concentration, motility, and morphological analysis for GSA-810 series of sperm quality analysis system.
Ge YM; Lu JC; Tang SS; Xu YH; Liang YJ
J Clin Lab Anal; 2023 Dec; 37(23-24):e24986. PubMed ID: 38009489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Machine Learning-Based Analysis of Sperm Videos and Participant Data for Male Fertility Prediction.
Hicks SA; Andersen JM; Witczak O; Thambawita V; Halvorsen P; Hammer HL; Haugen TB; Riegler MA
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16770. PubMed ID: 31727961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Computer-assisted assessment of sperm morphology: comparison with conventional techniques.
Marnet B; Vieitez G; Milhet P; Richoilley G; Lesourd F; Parinaud J
Int J Androl; 2000 Feb; 23(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 10632758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Measurement of membrane integrity in canine spermatozoa using a fluorescent computer-assisted spermatozoal quantification method and manual counting after eosin-nigrosin staining compared with manual counting after CFDA/PI staining.
Watts J
Reprod Domest Anim; 2019 Dec; 54(12):1583-1595. PubMed ID: 31545547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]