141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33741854)
21. [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) in Suspected Recurrent Breast Cancer: A Prospective Comparative Study of Dual-Time-Point FDG-PET/CT, Contrast-Enhanced CT, and Bone Scintigraphy.
Hildebrandt MG; Gerke O; Baun C; Falch K; Hansen JA; Farahani ZA; Petersen H; Larsen LB; Duvnjak S; Buskevica I; Bektas S; Søe K; Jylling AM; Ewertz M; Alavi A; Høilund-Carlsen PF
J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 34(16):1889-97. PubMed ID: 27001573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) on management of patients with carcinoma invading bladder muscle.
Mertens LS; Fioole-Bruining A; Vegt E; Vogel WV; van Rhijn BW; Horenblas S
BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 23790129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Restaging [
Mahajan S; Barker CA; Mauguen A; Singh B; Pandit-Taskar N
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2020 Apr; 82(4):878-886. PubMed ID: 31562942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prospective study on diagnostic and prognostic significance of postoperative FDG PET/CT in recurrent colorectal carcinoma patients: comparison with MRI and tumor markers.
Odalovic S; Stojiljkovic M; Sobic-Saranovic D; Pandurevic S; Brajkovic L; Milosevic I; Grozdic-Milojevic I; Artiko V
Neoplasma; 2017; 64(6):954-961. PubMed ID: 28895416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Overview of the clinical effectiveness of positron emission tomography imaging in selected cancers.
Facey K; Bradbury I; Laking G; Payne E
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Oct; 11(44):iii-iv, xi-267. PubMed ID: 17999839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predictive value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Seol HY; Kim YS; Kim SJ
Thorac Cancer; 2020 Nov; 11(11):3260-3268. PubMed ID: 32951338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Is (18)F-FDG-PET/CT prognostic factor for survival in patients with small cell lung cancer? Single center experience.
Inal A; Kucukoner M; Kaplan MA; Urakci Z; Nas N; Guven M; Dostbil Z; Altindag S; Isikdogan A
Rev Port Pneumol; 2013; 19(6):260-5. PubMed ID: 23993406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prognostic significance of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and correlation with PET-CT metabolic parameters in small cell lung cancer (SCLC).
Mirili C; Guney IB; Paydas S; Seydaoglu G; Kapukaya TK; Ogul A; Gokcay S; Buyuksimsek M; Yetisir AE; Karaalioglu B; Tohumcuoglu M
Int J Clin Oncol; 2019 Feb; 24(2):168-178. PubMed ID: 30109543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. 18F-FDG PET/CT in Restaging and Evaluation of Response to Therapy in Lung Cancer: State of the Art.
Castello A; Rossi S; Lopci E
Curr Radiopharm; 2020; 13(3):228-237. PubMed ID: 31886757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Imaging features and prognostic value of
Xu T; Zhang X; Zhang S; Liu C; Fu W; Zeng C; Chen Y
BMC Cancer; 2020 Jun; 20(1):596. PubMed ID: 32586285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic and prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in recurrent germinal tumor carcinoma.
Alongi P; Evangelista L; Caobelli F; Spallino M; Gianolli L; Midiri M; Picchio M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Jan; 45(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 28828589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prognostic value of the maximum standardized uptake value of pre-treatment primary lesions in small-cell lung cancer on 18F-FDG PET/CT: a meta-analysis.
Zhu D; Wang Y; Wang L; Chen J; Byanju S; Zhang H; Liao M
Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1082-1090. PubMed ID: 29256260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the primary staging of rectal cancer.
Ozis SE; Soydal C; Akyol C; Can N; Kucuk ON; Yagcı C; Erkek AB; Kuzu MA
World J Surg Oncol; 2014 Feb; 12():26. PubMed ID: 24484935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in comparison with CECT for whole-body assessment of patients with esophageal cancer.].
Altini C; Niccoli Asabella A; Lavelli V; Bianco G; Ungaro A; Pisani A; Merenda N; Ferrari C; Rubini G
Recenti Prog Med; 2019 Mar; 110(3):144-150. PubMed ID: 30968855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Recurrent bladder carcinoma: clinical and prognostic role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT.
Alongi P; Caobelli F; Gentile R; Stefano A; Russo G; Albano D; Baldari S; Gilardi MC; Midiri M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Feb; 44(2):224-233. PubMed ID: 27565154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prognostic significance of metabolic parameters measured by
Chang H; Lee SJ; Lim J; Lee JS; Kim YJ; Lee WW
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2019 May; 145(5):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 30900157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT as a post-treatment tool in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: comparison with FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT.
Suenaga Y; Kitajima K; Ishihara T; Sasaki R; Otsuki N; Nibu K; Minamikawa T; Kiyota N; Sugimura K
Eur Radiol; 2016 Apr; 26(4):1018-30. PubMed ID: 26188656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. 15-Year Experience of 18F-FDG PET Imaging in Response Assessment and Restaging After Definitive Treatment of Merkel Cell Carcinoma.
Byrne K; Siva S; Chait L; Callahan J; Bressel M; Seel M; MacManus MP; Hicks RJ
J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1328-33. PubMed ID: 26159592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of head and neck cancer with 18F-FDG PET: a comparison with conventional methods.
Kresnik E; Mikosch P; Gallowitsch HJ; Kogler D; Wiesser S; Heinisch M; Unterweger O; Raunik W; Kumnig G; Gomez I; Grünbacher G; Lind P
Eur J Nucl Med; 2001 Jul; 28(7):816-21. PubMed ID: 11504077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is combined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography superior to positron emission tomography or computed tomography alone for diagnosis, staging and restaging of pancreatic lesions?
Casneuf V; Delrue L; Kelles A; Van Damme N; Van Huysse J; Berrevoet F; De Vos M; Duyck P; Peeters M
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2007; 70(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 18330088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
