These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33743066)
1. The risk of conversion in minimally invasive oncological abdominal surgery. Meta-analysis of randomized evidence comparing traditional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted techniques. Guerra F; Giuliani G; Coletta D Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2021 May; 406(3):607-612. PubMed ID: 33743066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: an updated systematic review. Wang W; Fei Y; Liu J; Yu T; Tang J; Wei F ANZ J Surg; 2021 Jan; 91(1-2):42-48. PubMed ID: 32395906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short-term outcomes in robot-assisted compared to laparoscopic colon cancer resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cuk P; Kjær MD; Mogensen CB; Nielsen MF; Pedersen AK; Ellebæk MB Surg Endosc; 2022 Jan; 36(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 34724576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic versus laparoscopic approach to treat symptomatic achalasia: systematic review with meta-analysis. Milone M; Manigrasso M; Vertaldi S; Velotti N; Aprea G; Maione F; Gennarelli N; De Simone G; De Conno B; Pesce M; Sarnelli G; De Palma GD Dis Esophagus; 2019 Dec; 32(10):1-8. PubMed ID: 31274153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic major hepatectomies: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Coletta D; Levi Sandri GB; Giuliani G; Guerra F Int J Med Robot; 2021 Jun; 17(3):e2218. PubMed ID: 34196090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Prete FP; Pezzolla A; Prete F; Testini M; Marzaioli R; Patriti A; Jimenez-Rodriguez RM; Gurrado A; Strippoli GFM Ann Surg; 2018 Jun; 267(6):1034-1046. PubMed ID: 28984644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally Invasive, Laparoscopic, and Robotic-assisted Techniques Versus Open Techniques for Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review. Wagenaar S; Nederhoed JH; Hoksbergen AWJ; Bonjer HJ; Wisselink W; van Ramshorst GH Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):205-217. PubMed ID: 28262412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing pathologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic Surgery in rectal cancer resection: a propensity adjusted analysis of 7616 patients. Hopkins MB; Geiger TM; Bethurum AJ; Ford MM; Muldoon RL; Beck DE; Stewart TG; Hawkins AT Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2613-2622. PubMed ID: 31346754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short-term and long-term efficacy in robot-assisted treatment for mid and low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Wu H; Guo R; Li H Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Dec; 39(1):7. PubMed ID: 38127156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved perioperative outcomes and reduced inflammatory stress response in malignant robot-assisted colorectal resections: a retrospective cohort study of 298 patients. Cuk P; Simonsen RM; Komljen M; Nielsen MF; Helligsø P; Pedersen AK; Mogensen CB; Ellebæk MB World J Surg Oncol; 2021 May; 19(1):155. PubMed ID: 34022914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brandao LF; Autorino R; Laydner H; Haber GP; Ouzaid I; De Sio M; Perdonà S; Stein RJ; Porpiglia F; Kaouk JH Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1154-61. PubMed ID: 24079955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery]. Guo RX; Du JM; Wang PR; Li BJ; Li LX; Wang Q; Bai J Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 55(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 32146740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Urological and sexual function after robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Wee IJY; Kuo LJ; Ngu JC Int J Med Robot; 2021 Feb; 17(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 32945090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is robot-assisted laparoscopic right colectomy more effective than the conventional laparoscopic procedure? A meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. Rondelli F; Balzarotti R; Villa F; Guerra A; Avenia N; Mariani E; Bugiantella W Int J Surg; 2015 Jun; 18():75-82. PubMed ID: 25907328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic surgery for benign gynaecological disease. Liu H; Lu D; Wang L; Shi G; Song H; Clarke J Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; (2):CD008978. PubMed ID: 22336855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Open, laparoscopic, and robotic ureteroneocystotomy for benign and malignant ureteral lesions: a comparison of over 100 minimally invasive cases. Elsamra SE; Theckumparampil N; Garden B; Alom M; Waingankar N; Leavitt DA; Kreshover J; Schwartz M; Kavoussi LR; Richstone L J Endourol; 2014 Dec; 28(12):1455-9. PubMed ID: 25390972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: trends in technique and training challenges. Davis CH; Grandhi MS; Gazivoda VP; Greenbaum A; Kennedy TJ; Langan RC; Alexander HR; Pitt HA; August DA Surg Endosc; 2023 Jan; 37(1):266-273. PubMed ID: 35927351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Trastulli S; Farinella E; Cirocchi R; Cavaliere D; Avenia N; Sciannameo F; Gullà N; Noya G; Boselli C Colorectal Dis; 2012 Apr; 14(4):e134-56. PubMed ID: 22151033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Limited Evidence for Robot-assisted Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Broholm M; Onsberg Hansen I; Rosenberg J Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Apr; 26(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 26766316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Da vinci robotic surgery in gynaecological oncology: a critical interim appraisal]. Bartos P; Struppl D; Trhlík M; Czudek S; Skrovina M; Adamcík L; Soumarová R Ceska Gynekol; 2007 Oct; 72(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 18175521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]