59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33744153)
1. Aortic Stenosis Progression, Cardiac Damage, and Survival: Comparison Between Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves.
Yang LT; Boler A; Medina-Inojosa JR; Scott CG; Maurer MJ; Eleid MF; Enriquez-Sarano M; Tribouilloy C; Michelena HI
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jun; 14(6):1113-1126. PubMed ID: 33744153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed tomography calcium scoring in aortic stenosis: bicuspid versus tricuspid morphology.
Ye Z; Clavel MA; Foley TA; Pibarot P; Enriquez-Sarano M; Michelena HI
Heart; 2024 Mar; 110(8):594-602. PubMed ID: 37903555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance analysis of ventricular volumes in bicuspid and trileaflet aortic regurgitation.
Sevilla T; Rojas G; González-Bartol E; Candela J; Gil JF; Revilla A; Aristizabal-Duque C; Gomez Salvador I; San Román Calvar JA
Heart; 2023 Sep; 109(20):1558-1563. PubMed ID: 37230740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determinants of Aortic Stenosis Progression in Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves.
Shen M; Tastet L; Capoulade R; Bédard É; Arsenault M; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
CJC Pediatr Congenit Heart Dis; 2022 Aug; 1(4):184-192. PubMed ID: 37969929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of aortic stiffness and hypertension in repaired coarctation patients with a bicuspid versus a tricuspid aortic valve.
Saengsin K; Gauvreau K; Prakash A
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2023 Jun; 25(1):31. PubMed ID: 37316842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characteristics and prognosis of isolated aortic valve infective endocarditis in patients with bicuspid aortic valves: a propensity matched study.
Bohbot Y; Denev S; Benvenga RM; Philip M; Michelena HI; Citro R; Habib G; Tribouilloy C
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2023; 10():1304957. PubMed ID: 38155986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Late outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in bicuspid versus tricuspid valves: Meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data.
Sá MP; Van den Eynde J; Jacquemyn X; Tasoudis P; Erten O; Dokollari A; Torregrossa G; Sicouri S; Ramlawi B
Trends Cardiovasc Med; 2023 Oct; 33(7):458-467. PubMed ID: 35513298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Age-Stratified Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis.
Mehta CK; Liu TX; Bonnell L; Habib RH; Kaneko T; Flaherty JD; Davidson CJ; Thomas JD; Rigolin VH; Bonow RO; Pham DT; Johnston DR; McCarthy PM; Malaisrie SC
Ann Thorac Surg; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38286202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Midterm durability of valve-sparing root replacement in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves.
Tran A; Shih E; Harrington KB; Schaffer JM; Banwait JK; Wang Z; DiMaio JM; Mack MJ; Ryan WH; Brinkman WT;
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent); 2024; 37(4):569-575. PubMed ID: 38910820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Prevalence of Coronary Artery Disease in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Patients: An Overview of the Literature.
Dolmaci OB; Hilhorst TL; Malekzadeh A; Mertens BJA; Klautz RJM; Poelmann RE; Grewal N
Aorta (Stamford); 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38698623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic Performance of Cardiac CT and Transthoracic Echocardiography for Detection of Surgically Confirmed Bicuspid Aortic Valve: Effect of Calcium Extent and Valve Subtypes.
Kim J; Kim SM; Ahn J; Kim J; Choe YH
J Korean Soc Radiol; 2023 Nov; 84(6):1324-1336. PubMed ID: 38107699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of Prevalence and Clinical Features of Aortic Stenosis in Patients with and without Bicuspid Aortic Valve Using Machine Learning Methods.
Irtyuga O; Babakekhyan M; Kostareva A; Uspensky V; Gordeev M; Faggian G; Malashicheva A; Metsker O; Shlyakhto E; Kopanitsa G
J Pers Med; 2023 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 38003903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term outcome of bicuspid aortic valve disease.
Aschauer J; Zilberszac R; Gleiss A; Colizzi C; Binder T; Bruno P; Laufer G; Massetti M; Gabriel H; Rosenhek R
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Feb; 25(3):425-435. PubMed ID: 37966276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increasing baseline aortic valve peak flow velocity is associated with progression of aortic valve stenosis in osteoporosis patients-a possible link to low vitamin D status.
Tsuruda T; Funamoto T; Suzuki C; Yamamura Y; Nakai M; Chosa E; Kaikita K
Arch Osteoporos; 2023 Oct; 18(1):129. PubMed ID: 37874407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship between peak aortic jet velocity and progression of aortic stenosis in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
Kurasawa S; Imaizumi T; Kondo T; Hishida M; Okazaki M; Nishibori N; Takeda Y; Kasuga H; Maruyama S
Int J Cardiol; 2024 May; 402():131822. PubMed ID: 38301831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cardiac Damage in Early Aortic Stenosis: Is the Valve to Blame?
Dahl JS; Julakanti R; Ali M; Scott CG; Padang R; Pellikka PA
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38904570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. TAV-in-TAV and Beyond: How Far Can We Go?
Taramasso M; Tagliari AP; Fischman DL
JACC Case Rep; 2023 Sep; 22():101974. PubMed ID: 37790778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of TAV-in-TAV using SAPIEN3 Ultra RESILIA for supra-skirtal-leakage with intravascular hemolysis.
Otake R; Hachinohe D; Horita R; Armando Diaz J; Shitan H; Fujita T
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38743353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrocardiogram screening for aortic valve stenosis using artificial intelligence.
Cohen-Shelly M; Attia ZI; Friedman PA; Ito S; Essayagh BA; Ko WY; Murphree DH; Michelena HI; Enriquez-Sarano M; Carter RE; Johnson PW; Noseworthy PA; Lopez-Jimenez F; Oh JK
Eur Heart J; 2021 Aug; 42(30):2885-2896. PubMed ID: 33748852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survival after surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.
Jahangiri M
Heart; 2021 Jul; 107(14):1113-1114. PubMed ID: 33795380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
