166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33744721)
1. Neuromuscular compensation strategies adopted at the shoulder following bilateral subpectoral implant breast reconstruction.
Leonardis JM; Wolff WL; Momoh AO; Lipps DB
J Biomech; 2021 May; 120():110348. PubMed ID: 33744721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional integrity of the shoulder joint and pectoralis major following subpectoral implant breast reconstruction.
Leonardis JM; Lyons DA; Giladi AM; Momoh AO; Lipps DB
J Orthop Res; 2019 Jul; 37(7):1610-1619. PubMed ID: 30816589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of reconstruction choice and inclusion of radiation therapy on functional shoulder biomechanics in women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer.
Leonardis JM; Diefenbach BJ; Lyons DA; Olinger TA; Giladi AM; Momoh AO; Lipps DB
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jan; 173(2):447-453. PubMed ID: 30328049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Posture-dependent neuromuscular contributions to three-dimensional isometric shoulder torque generation.
Leonardis JM; Alkayyali AA; Lipps DB
J Neurophysiol; 2020 Apr; 123(4):1526-1535. PubMed ID: 32101487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Choosing breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy and subpectoral implant breast reconstruction: implications for pectoralis major function.
Leonardis JM; Momoh AO; Lipps DB
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38851662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective comparison study of early functional outcomes after implant-based breast reconstruction: subpectoral versus prepectoral technique.
Lee JS; Park E; Lee JH; Lee J; Park HY; Yang JD; Jung TD
Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Mar; 10(3):2520-2529. PubMed ID: 33691448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Influence of Functional Shoulder Biomechanics as a Mediator of Patient-Reported Outcomes following Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction.
Leonardis JM; Lyons DA; Kidwell KM; Giladi AM; Lipps DB; Momoh AO
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jan; 147(1):181-192. PubMed ID: 33009332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct-to-Implant Extracellular Matrix Hammock-based Breast Reconstruction; Prepectoral or Subpectoral?
Dyrberg DL; Gunnarsson GL; Bille C; Sørensen JA; Thomsen JB
Trials; 2020 Feb; 21(1):160. PubMed ID: 32041661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Best-BRA (Is subpectoral or prepectoral implant placement best in immediate breast reconstruction?): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy.
Roberts K; Mills N; Metcalfe C; Lane A; Clement C; Hollingworth W; Taylor J; Holcombe C; Skillman J; Fairhurst K; Whisker L; Cutress R; Thrush S; Fairbrother P; Potter S
BMJ Open; 2021 Nov; 11(11):e050886. PubMed ID: 34848516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Functional return after implant-based breast reconstruction: A prospective study of objective and patient-reported outcomes.
Patel AU; Day SJ; Pencek M; Roussel LO; Christiano JG; Punekar IR; Koltz PF; Langstein HN
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 May; 73(5):850-855. PubMed ID: 31973982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-Stage Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison Between Subpectoral Versus Prepectoral Implant Placement.
Manrique OJ; Kapoor T; Banuelos J; Jacobson SR; Martinez-Jorge J; Nguyen MT; Tran NV; Harless CA; Degnim AC; Jakub JW
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Apr; 84(4):361-365. PubMed ID: 31633546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Mirhaidari SJ; Azouz V; Wagner DS
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Mar; 84(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 31663934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of subpectoral versus dual-plane implant based immediate breast reconstruction after nipple-areola sparing mastectomy.
Ozgur I; Kurul S; Bademler S; Karanlik H
Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2021 Dec; 66(6):447-458. PubMed ID: 33223365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Critical Appraisal of Late Complications of Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
King CA; Bartholomew AJ; Sosin M; Avila A; Famiglietti AL; Dekker PK; Perez-Alvarez IM; Song DH; Fan KL; Tousimis EA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 28(13):9150-9158. PubMed ID: 34386913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment of Breast Animation Deformity in Implant-Based Reconstruction with Selective Nerve Ablation.
Eck DL; Nguyen DC; Barnes LL; Jansen DA
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Dec; 42(6):1472-1475. PubMed ID: 29959495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of Life and Early Functional Evaluation in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Comparative Study Between Prepectoral Versus Dual-Plane Reconstruction.
Caputo GG; Zingaretti N; Kiprianidis I; Zanfisi C; Domenici L; Parodi PC; Governa M
Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 33308993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing shoulder muscle stretch reflexes following breast cancer treatment and postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
Lulic-Kuryllo T; Leonardis JM; Momoh AO; Lipps DB
J Neurophysiol; 2023 Apr; 129(4):914-926. PubMed ID: 36947887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Decreased postoperative pain and opioid use following prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A retrospective cohort study: Pain after pre- versus subpectoral reconstruction.
Bozzuto LM; Bartholomew AJ; Tung S; Sosin M; Tambar S; Cox S; Perez-Alvarez IM; King CA; Chan MC; Pittman TA; Tousimis EA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Aug; 74(8):1763-1769. PubMed ID: 33451949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
