392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33744885)
1. Case Report: Evaluating Biomechanical Risk Factors in Carotid Stenosis by Patient-Specific Fluid-Structural Interaction Biomechanical Analysis.
Wang J; Mendieta JB; Paritala PK; Xiang Y; Raffel OC; McGahan T; Lloyd T; Li Z
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2021; 50(3):262-269. PubMed ID: 33744885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Plaque Longitudinal Heterogeneity in Morphology, Property, and Mechanobiology.
Paritala PK; Yarlagadda T; Mendieta JB; Wang J; McGahan T; Lloyd T; Yarlagadda PKDV; Li Z
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2021; 50(5):510-519. PubMed ID: 33951645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3D critical plaque wall stress is a better predictor of carotid plaque rupture sites than flow shear stress: An in vivo MRI-based 3D FSI study.
Teng Z; Canton G; Yuan C; Ferguson M; Yang C; Huang X; Zheng J; Woodard PK; Tang D
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Mar; 132(3):031007. PubMed ID: 20459195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of computational strategy on prediction of mechanical stress in carotid atherosclerotic plaques: comparison of 2D structure-only, 3D structure-only, one-way and fully coupled fluid-structure interaction analyses.
Huang Y; Teng Z; Sadat U; Graves MJ; Bennett MR; Gillard JH
J Biomech; 2014 Apr; 47(6):1465-71. PubMed ID: 24529358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the Impact of Calcification on Plaque Vulnerability from the Aspect of Mechanical Interaction Between Blood Flow and Artery Based on MRI.
Benitez J; Fontanarosa D; Wang J; Paritala PK; McGahan T; Lloyd T; Li Z
Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Apr; 49(4):1169-1182. PubMed ID: 33079320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI-based biomechanical parameters for carotid artery plaque vulnerability assessment.
Speelman L; Teng Z; Nederveen AJ; van der Lugt A; Gillard JH
Thromb Haemost; 2016 Mar; 115(3):493-500. PubMed ID: 26791734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fluid-structure interaction study of hemodynamics and its biomechanical influence on carotid artery atherosclerotic plaque deposits.
Oyejide AJ; Awonusi AA; Ige EO
Med Eng Phys; 2023 Jul; 117():103998. PubMed ID: 37331752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contribution of atherosclerotic plaque location and severity to the near-wall hemodynamics of the carotid bifurcation: an experimental study and FSI modeling.
Ahmadpour-B M; Nooraeen A; Tafazzoli-Shadpour M; Taghizadeh H
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2021 Jun; 20(3):1069-1085. PubMed ID: 33609192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sites of rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaques are associated with high structural stresses: an in vivo MRI-based 3D fluid-structure interaction study.
Tang D; Teng Z; Canton G; Yang C; Ferguson M; Huang X; Zheng J; Woodard PK; Yuan C
Stroke; 2009 Oct; 40(10):3258-63. PubMed ID: 19628799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of morphological and rheological conditions between conventional and eversion carotid endarterectomy using computational fluid dynamics--a pilot study.
Demirel S; Chen D; Mei Y; Partovi S; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Dadrich M; Böckler D; Kauczor HU; Müller-Eschner M
Vascular; 2015 Oct; 23(5):474-82. PubMed ID: 25298137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intracranial collateralization determines hemodynamic forces for carotid plaque disruption.
Lal BK; Beach KW; Sumner DS
J Vasc Surg; 2011 Nov; 54(5):1461-71. PubMed ID: 21820834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Study of carotid arterial plaque stress for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
Gao H; Long Q; Kumar Das S; Halls J; Graves M; Gillard JH; Li ZY
J Biomech; 2011 Sep; 44(14):2551-7. PubMed ID: 21824619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Structural analysis and magnetic resonance imaging predict plaque vulnerability: a study comparing symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.
Li ZY; Howarth SP; Tang T; Graves MJ; U-King-Im J; Trivedi RA; Kirkpatrick PJ; Gillard JH
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Apr; 45(4):768-75. PubMed ID: 17349771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computational Fluid-Dynamic Analysis after Carotid Endarterectomy: Patch Graft versus Direct Suture Closure.
Domanin M; Buora A; Scardulla F; Guerciotti B; Forzenigo L; Biondetti P; Vergara C
Ann Vasc Surg; 2017 Oct; 44():325-335. PubMed ID: 28479438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Blood Flow Pattern Analysis for Carotid Plaque Evaluation.
Shimonaga K; Matsushige T; Sakamoto S; Takahashi H; Hashimoto Y; Mizoue T; Ono C; Kurisu K
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2020 Feb; 29(2):104539. PubMed ID: 31810722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Personalized brain revascularization: computer modeling of the reconstruction zone for carotid endarterectomy].
Kazantsev AN; Burkov NN; Zakharov YN; Borisov VG; Lider RY; Bayandin MS; Anufriev AI
Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2020; (6):71-75. PubMed ID: 32573535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relation between B-mode gray-scale median and clinical features of carotid stenosis vulnerability.
Kolkert JL; Meerwaldt R; Loonstra J; Schenk M; van der Palen J; van den Dungen JJ; Zeebregts CJ
Ann Vasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 28(2):404-10. PubMed ID: 24360629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morphometric and hemodynamic analysis of atherosclerotic progression in human carotid artery bifurcations.
Huang X; Yin X; Xu Y; Jia X; Li J; Niu P; Shen W; Kassab GS; Tan W; Huo Y
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2016 Mar; 310(5):H639-47. PubMed ID: 26747497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical stresses in carotid plaques using MRI-based fluid-structure interaction models.
Kock SA; Nygaard JV; Eldrup N; Fründ ET; Klaerke A; Paaske WP; Falk E; Yong Kim W
J Biomech; 2008; 41(8):1651-8. PubMed ID: 18485351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite element model of the patched human carotid.
Kamenskiy AV; Pipinos II; Desyatova AS; Salkovskiy YE; Yu Kossovich L; Kirillova IV; Bockeria LA; Morozov KM; Polyaev VO; Lynch TG; Dzenis YA
Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2009 Dec; 43(6):533-41. PubMed ID: 19828588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
