These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3374714)

  • 1. [Perception of vibration. Normal findings and methodologic aspects].
    Claus D; Carvalho VP; Neundörfer B; Blaise JF
    Nervenarzt; 1988 Mar; 59(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 3374714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Measuring vibration sense in childhood. Normal values and initial experiences in polyneuropathies].
    Meister C; Molinari L; Thun-Hohenstein L; Boltshauser E
    Monatsschr Kinderheilkd; 1993 May; 141(5):416-20. PubMed ID: 8326962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducibility of vibratory perception thresholds in patients with diabetic neuropathy.
    Bertelsmann FW; Heimans JJ; van Rooy JC; Heine RJ; van der Veen EA
    Diabetes Res; 1986 Nov; 3(9):463-6. PubMed ID: 3829585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of the C64 quantitative tuning fork and the effect of niceritrol in diabetic neuropathy.
    Hotta N; Sugimura K; Tsuchida I; Sano T; Koh N; Matsumae H; Sakamoto N
    Clin Ther; 1994; 16(6):1007-15. PubMed ID: 7697680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Improvement of temperature and vibration sense in chronic uremia after a single dialysis].
    Hilz MJ; Claus D; Rösl G; Hofmann E; Braun J; Neundörfer B
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 1995 Jul; 63(7):264-9. PubMed ID: 7672749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproducibility of different methods for diagnosing and monitoring diabetic neuropathy.
    Nasseri K; Strijers RL; Dekhuijzen LS; Buster M; Bertelsmann FW
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998; 38(5):295-9. PubMed ID: 9741007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between monofilament, tuning fork and vibration perception tests for screening patients at risk of foot complication.
    Gin H; Rigalleau V; Baillet L; Rabemanantsoa C
    Diabetes Metab; 2002 Dec; 28(6 Pt 1):457-61. PubMed ID: 12522325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative measurement of cutaneous perception in diabetic neuropathy.
    Vinik AI; Suwanwalaikorn S; Stansberry KB; Holland MT; McNitt PM; Colen LE
    Muscle Nerve; 1995 Jun; 18(6):574-84. PubMed ID: 7753119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of diabetic neuropathy: definition of norm and discrimination of abnormal nerve function.
    Claus D; Mustafa C; Vogel W; Herz M; Neundörfer B
    Muscle Nerve; 1993 Jul; 16(7):757-68. PubMed ID: 8505932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tuning fork (128 Hz) versus neurothesiometer: a comparison of methods of assessing vibration sensation in patients with diabetes mellitus.
    O'Neill J; McCann SM; Lagan KM
    Int J Clin Pract; 2006 Feb; 60(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 16451290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardiac autonomic involvement and peripheral nerve function in patients with diabetic neuropathy.
    Spitzer A; Lang E; Birklein F; Claus D; Neundörfer B
    Funct Neurol; 1997; 12(3-4):115-22. PubMed ID: 9218965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative measurement of vibratory perception threshold using a new vibrometer TM-31A.
    Kamon N
    J Occup Med; 1994 Sep; 36(9):989-96. PubMed ID: 7823221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensory perception threshold measurement: an evaluation of semiobjective testing devices.
    Halar EM; Hammond MC; LaCava EC; Camann C; Ward J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1987 Aug; 68(8):499-507. PubMed ID: 3619613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of clinical examination, current and vibratory perception threshold in diabetic polyneuropathy.
    Tack CJ; Netten PM; Scheepers MH; Meijer JW; Smits P; Lutterman J
    Neth J Med; 1994 Feb; 44(2):41-9. PubMed ID: 8208323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The tuning fork revisited.
    Liniger C; Albeanu A; Bloise D; Assal JP
    Diabet Med; 1990 Dec; 7(10):859-64. PubMed ID: 2149682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standardised method of determining vibratory perception thresholds for diagnosis and screening in neurological investigation.
    Goldberg JM; Lindblom U
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1979 Sep; 42(9):793-803. PubMed ID: 501379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vibratory testing with the 64 Hz Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork and its relation to the sural nerve action potential.
    Xirou S; Kokotis P; Zambelis T; Anagnostou E
    J Peripher Nerv Syst; 2020 Dec; 25(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 33107143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The assessment of vibration sense in the musculoskeletal examination: Moving towards a valid and reliable quantitative approach to vibration testing in clinical practice.
    O' Conaire E; Rushton A; Wright C
    Man Ther; 2011 Jun; 16(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 21339080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test-retest and time dependent variation and diagnostic values of vibratory sensation determined by biothesiometer and the Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork.
    Wittenberg B; Svendsen TK; Gaist LM; Itani M; Gylfadottir SS; Jensen TS; Gaist D; Sindrup SH; Krøigård T
    Brain Behav; 2021 Aug; 11(8):e2230. PubMed ID: 34087955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Choosing a Vibratory Test to Pair With Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Testing for Evaluating Lower Extremity Sensation in Patients With Diabetes: A Comparison of Three Vibratory Methodologies.
    Raymond B; Steriovski J; Gillyard K; Yang C; Wu SC; Crews RT
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 14(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 31113243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.