170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33747965)
1. A Lymph Node Count-Based AJCC Staging System Facilitates a More Accurate Prediction of the Prognosis of Patients With Endometrial Cancer.
Huo X; Wang S
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():641962. PubMed ID: 33747965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inclusion of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes in the Staging System for Medullary Thyroid Cancer: Validating a Modified American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging System.
Wang Z; Tang C; Wang Y; Yin Z; Rixiati Y
Thyroid; 2022 May; 32(5):536-543. PubMed ID: 35350868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Modification of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gallbladder carcinoma to improve prognostic precision.
Jiang W; Zhao B; Li Y; Qi D; Wang D
BMC Cancer; 2020 Nov; 20(1):1129. PubMed ID: 33225924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lymph Node Ratio-Based Staging System for Gallbladder Cancer With Fewer Than Six Lymph Nodes Examined.
Li J; Sun Y; Zhao B; Tang C; Fan D; Jiang W; Rixiati Y
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():542005. PubMed ID: 33102214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What is the most accurate lymph node staging method for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma? Comparison of UICC/AJCC pN stage, number of metastatic lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes.
Conci S; Ruzzenente A; Sandri M; Bertuzzo F; Campagnaro T; Bagante F; Capelli P; D'Onofrio M; Piccino M; Dorna AE; Pedrazzani C; Iacono C; Guglielmi A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):743-750. PubMed ID: 28094085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer.
Greenstein AJ; Litle VR; Swanson SJ; Divino CM; Packer S; Wisnivesky JP
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(6):1239-46. PubMed ID: 18224663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic Implications of Lymph Node Status for Patients With Gallbladder Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study.
Amini N; Kim Y; Wilson A; Margonis GA; Ethun CG; Poultsides G; Tran T; Idrees K; Isom CA; Fields RC; Krasnick B; Weber SM; Salem A; Martin RC; Scoggins C; Shen P; Mogal HD; Schmidt C; Beal E; Hatzaras I; Shenoy R; Maithel SK; Pawlik TM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):3016-23. PubMed ID: 27150440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of Quantitative Metastatic Lymph Node Burden With Survival in Hypopharyngeal and Laryngeal Cancer.
Ho AS; Kim S; Tighiouart M; Gudino C; Mita A; Scher KS; Laury A; Prasad R; Shiao SL; Ali N; Patio C; Mallen-St Clair J; Van Eyk JE; Zumsteg ZS
JAMA Oncol; 2018 Jul; 4(7):985-989. PubMed ID: 29192305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of four lymph node staging systems for predicting prognosis for stage IV rectum cancer.
Han L; Mo S; Xiang W; Li Q; Wang R; Xu Y; Dai W; Cai G
Ann Transl Med; 2020 Feb; 8(4):111. PubMed ID: 32175404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth staging system for gallbladder cancer and its lymphadenectomy guidelines.
Lee AJ; Chiang YJ; Lee JE; Conrad C; Chun YS; Aloia TA; Vauthey JN; Tzeng CD
J Surg Res; 2018 Oct; 230():148-154. PubMed ID: 30100032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The prognostic significance of aortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer: Potential implications for selective aortic lymph node assessment.
Cosgrove CM; Cohn DE; Rhoades J; Felix AS
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Jun; 153(3):505-510. PubMed ID: 30935714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Different Lymph Node Staging Schemes for Predicting Survival Outcomes in Node-Positive Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer Patients.
Yang XL; Huang N; Wang MM; Lai H; Wu DJ
Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():688535. PubMed ID: 34307415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma.
Kılıç MÖ; Gündoğdu SB; Özden S; Saylam B; Tez M
Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Feb; 118(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 28669280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Number and ratio of metastatic lymph nodes impacts the prognosis of submandibular gland cancer.
Fang Q; Dai L; Zhang X; Luo R; Yuan J
PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0296040. PubMed ID: 38157336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical lymph node metastasis classified as regional nodal staging in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical esophagectomy and three-field lymph node dissection.
Chen J; Wu S; Zheng X; Pan J; Zhu K; Chen Y; Li J; Liao L; Lin Y; Liao Z
BMC Surg; 2014 Dec; 14():110. PubMed ID: 25527100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anatomical location-based nodal staging system is superior to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system among patients with surgically resected, histologically low-grade gastric cancer: A single institutional experience.
Chen MW; Chan CP; Lin YJ; Yen HH
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211836. PubMed ID: 30721261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Proposed Modified Staging System for Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A SEER Analysis With Multicenter Validation.
Wang Z; Fan X; Zha X; Xu Y; Yin Z; Rixiati Y; Yu F
Oncologist; 2024 Jan; 29(1):e59-e67. PubMed ID: 37311049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term survival of patients with stage II and III gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with inadequate nodal assessment.
Desiderio J; Sagnotta A; Terrenato I; Garofoli E; Mosillo C; Trastulli S; Arteritano F; Tozzi F; D'Andrea V; Fong Y; Woo Y; Bracarda S; Parisi A
World J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Nov; 13(11):1463-1483. PubMed ID: 34950434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lymph node ratio-based staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Chen SB; Weng HR; Wang G; Zou XF; Liu DT; Chen YP; Zhang H
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jun; 21(24):7514-21. PubMed ID: 26139998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of five competing lymph node staging schemes in a cohort of resectable gastric cancer patients.
Smith DD; Nelson RA; Schwarz RE
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):875-82. PubMed ID: 24242677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
